Beyond biologics: Absorbable mesh as a low-cost, low-complication sling for implant-based breast reconstruction

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 133, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

  Tessler, Oren ^a   Reish, Richard G ^a   Maman, Daniel Y ^a   Smith, Barbara L ^a   Austen, William G ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; BREAST AUGMENTATION; COST; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL MESH;

ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS; ADULT; AGED; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BREAST IMPLANTATION; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL MESH;

EID: 84893567317     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000437253.55457.63     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg. 2003;238:120-127.
2. Sacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros AC, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: Oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:704-714.
3. Pennisi VR, Capozzi A. Subcutaneous mastectomy data: A fnal statistical analysis of 1500 patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1989;13:15-21.
4. Bishop CC, Singh S, Nash AG. Mastectomy and breast reconstruction preserving the nipple. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1990;72:87-89.
5. Crowe JP Jr, Kim JA, Yetman R, Banbury J, Patrick RJ, Baynes D. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: Technique and results of 54 procedures. Arch Surg. 2004;139:148-150.
6. Palmer BV, Mannur KR, Ross WB. Subcutaneous mastectomy with immediate reconstruction as treatment for early breast cancer. Br J Surg. 1992;79:1309-1311.
7. Stanec Z, Zic R, Stanec S, Budi S, Hudson D, Skoll P. Skin-sparing mastectomy with nipple-areola conservation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:496-498; author reply 498.
8. Hayes AJ, Garner JP, Nicholas W, Laidlaw IJ. A comparative study of envelope mastectomy and immediate reconstruction (EMIR) with standard latissimus dorsi immediate breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;30:744-749.
9. Breuing KH, Warren SM. Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55:232-239.
10. Salzberg CA. Nonexpansive immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular tissue matrix graft (AlloDerm). Ann Plast Surg. 2006;57:1-5.
11. Spear SL, Parikh PM, Reisin E, Menon NG. Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008;32:418-425.
12. Salzberg CA. Focus on technique: One-stage implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130 (Suppl 2):95S-103S.
13. Vardanian AJ, Clayton JL, Roostaeian J, et al. Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:403e-410e.
14. Breuing KH, Colwell AS. Inferolateral AlloDerm hammock for implant coverage in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59:250-255.
15. Zienowicz RJ, Karacaoglu E. Implant-based breast reconstruction with allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:373-381.
16. Hanna KR, DeGeorge BR Jr, Mericli AF, Lin KY, Drake DB. Comparison study of two types of expander-based breast reconstruction: Acellular dermal matrix-assisted versus total submuscular placement. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70:10-15.
17. Collis GN, TerKonda SP, Waldorf JC, Perdikis G. Acellular dermal matrix slings in tissue expander breast reconstruction: Are there substantial benefts? Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68:425-428.
18. Macadam SA, Lennox PA. Acellular dermal matrices: Economic considerations in reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2012;39:187-216.
19. Lanier ST, Wang ED, Chen JJ, et al. The effect of acel-lular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64:674-678.
20. Liu AS, Kao HK, Reish RG, Hergrueter CA, May JW Jr, Guo L. Postoperative complications in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1755-1762.
21. Nguyen MD, Chen C, Colakoglu S, Morris DJ, Tobias AM, Lee BT. Infectious complications leading to explantation in implant-based breast reconstruction with AlloDerm. Eplasty 2010;10:e48.
22. Weichman KE, Wilson SC, Weinstein AL, et al. The use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:1049-1058.
23. Antony AK, McCarthy CM, Cordeiro PG, et al. Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: Determining the incidence and signifcant predictors of complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1606-1614.
24. Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:429-436.
25. Kim JY, Davila AA, Persing S, et al. A meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:28-41.
26. Hoppe IC, Yueh JH, Wei CH, Ahuja NK, Patel PP, Datiashvili RO. Complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction utilizing acellular dermal matrix: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eplasty 2011;11:e40.
27. Sbitany H, Serletti JM. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: A systematic and critical review of effcacy and associated morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1162-1169.
28. Nyame TT, Lemon KP, Kolter R, Liao EC. High-throughput assay for bacterial adhesion on acellular dermal matrices and synthetic surgical materials. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1061-1068.
29. Colwell AS, Damjanovic B, Zahedi B, Medford-Davis L, Hertl C, Austen WG Jr. Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acel-lular dermal matrix: Indications, complications, trends, and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1170-1178.
30. Salzberg CA, Ashikari AY, Koch RM, Chabner-Thompson E. An 8-year experience of direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:514-524.
31. Israeli R. Complications of acellular dermal matrices in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(Suppl 2):159S-172S.
32. Cunningham B. The Mentor Core Study on Silicone MemoryGel Breast Implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(Suppl 1):19S-29S; discussion 30S-32S.
33. Cunningham B. The Mentor Study on Contour Profle Gel Silicone MemoryGel Breast Implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(Suppl 1):33S-39S.
34. Cunningham B, McCue J. Safety and effectiveness of Mentor's MemoryGel implants at 6 years. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33:440-444.
35. Bengtson BP, Van Natta BW, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Maxwell GP; Style 410 U.S. Core Clinical Study Group. Style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implant core study results at 3 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(Suppl 1):40S-48S.
36. Spear SL, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Walker PS; Inamed Silicone Breast Implant U.S. Study Group. Inamed silicone breast implant core study results at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(Suppl 1):8S-16S; discussion 17S.
37. Garwood ER, Moore D, Ewing C, et al. Total skin-sparing mastectomy: Complications and local recurrence rates in 2 cohorts of patients. Ann Surg. 2009;249:26-32.
38. Wijayanayagam A, Kumar AS, Foster RD, Esserman LJ. Optimizing the total skin-sparing mastectomy. Arch Surg. 2008;143:38-45; discussion 45.
39. Salzberg CA, Ashikari AY, Koch RM, Chabner-Thompson E. An 8-year experience of direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:514-524.
40. Nahabedian MY. Acellular dermal matrices in primary breast reconstruction: Principles, concepts, and indications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(Suppl 2):44S-53S.
41. Uzunismail A, Perk C, Findik H, Beyhan G, Dincler M. Effect of a fascial tissue interface on silicone implant capsule formation: A preliminary experimental study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61:1199-1204.
42. Stump A, Holton LH III, Connor J, Harper JR, Slezak S, Silverman RP. The use of acellular dermal matrix to prevent capsule formation around implants in a primate model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:82-91.
43. Basu CB, Leong M, Hicks MJ. Acellular cadaveric dermis decreases the infammatory response in capsule formation in reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1842-1847.
44. Jansen LA, Macadam SA. The use of AlloDerm in postmas-tectomy alloplastic breast reconstruction: Part II. A cost analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:2245-2254.
45. de Blacam C, Momoh AO, Colakoglu S, Slavin SA, Tobias AM, Lee BT. Cost analysis of implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;69:516-520.
46. Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: The BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:345-353.