Accuracy of preoperative MRI in predicting pathology stage in rectal cancers: Nodefor- Node matched histopathology validation of MRI features

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 32-38

  Park, Jun Seok ^a   Jang, Yun Jin ^b   Choi, Gyu Seog ^a   Park, Soo Yeun ^a   Kim, Hye Jin ^a   Kang, Hyun ^c   Cho, Seung Hyun ^b  

^a Kyungpook National University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Kyungpook National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^c Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Accuracy; MRI; Node by node analysis; Rectal cancer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EX VIVO STUDY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECTUM CANCER; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASOUND; VALIDATION PROCESS; ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; COHORT ANALYSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; LYMPH NODE; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; PATHOLOGY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RECTUM; RECTUM TUMOR; RECTAL NEOPLASMS;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; LYMPH NODES; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RECTUM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84893488073     PISSN: 00123706     EISSN: 15300358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000004     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al.; Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:638-646.
2. Gérard A, Buyse M, Nordlinger B, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment in rectal cancer: final results of a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Ann Surg. 1988;208:606-614.
3. I mproved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:980-987.
4. Bianchi PP, Ceriani C, Rottoli M, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance in preoperative staging of rectal cancer: comparison with histologic findings. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9:1222-1227.
5. Branagan G, Chave H, Fuller C, McGee S, Finnis D. Can magnetic resonance imaging predict circumferential margins and TNM stage in rectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:1317-1322.
6. Burton S, Brown G, Daniels I, et al. MRI identified prognostic features of tumors in distal sigmoid, rectosigmoid, and upper rectum: treatment with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65:445-451.
7. Ferri M, Laghi A, Mingazzini P, et al. Pre-operative assessment of extramural invasion and sphincteral involvement in rectal cancer by magnetic resonance imaging with phased-array coil. Colorectal Dis. 2005;7:387-393.
8. Strassburg J, Lewin A, Ludwig K, et al. Optimised surgery (socalled TME surgery) and high-resolution MRI in the planning of treatment of rectal carcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2007;392:179-188.
9. Brown G, Richards CJ, Bourne MW, et al. Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial- resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison. Radiology. 2003;227:371-377.
10. Kim JH, Beets GL, Kim MJ, Kessels AG, Beets-Tan RG. High-resolution MR imaging for nodal staging in rectal cancer: are there any criteria in addition to the size? Eur J Radiol. 2004;52:78-83.
11. Park JS, Choi GS, Jun SH, Hasegawa S, Sakai Y. Laparoscopic versus open intersphincteric resection and coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: intermediate-term oncologic outcomes. Ann Surg. 2011;254:941-946.
12. Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:3195-3202.
13. Taylor FG, Quirke P, Heald RJ, et al.; MERCURY study group. Preoperative high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging can identify good prognosis stage I, II, and III rectal cancer best managed by surgery alone: a prospective, multicenter, European study. Ann Surg. 2011;253:711-719.
14. Baek SJ, Kim SH, Kwak JM, et al. Selective use of preoperative chemoradiotherapy for T3 rectal cancer can be justified: analysis of local recurrence. World J Surg. 2013;37:220-226.
15. Bipat S, Glas AS, Slors FJ, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J. Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging-a metaanalysis. Radiology. 2004;232:773-783.
16. A l-Sukhni E, Milot L, Fruitman M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2212-2223.
17. Kwok H, Bissett IP, Hill GL. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2000;15:9-20.
18. M aretto I, Pomerri F, Pucciarelli S, et al. The potential of restaging in the prediction of pathologic response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:455-461.
19. S uppiah A, Hunter IA, Cowley J, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging accuracy in assessing tumour down-staging following chemoradiation in rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11:249-253.
20. Mezzi G, Arcidiacono PG, Carrara S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for re-staging rectal cancer after radiotherapy. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:5563-5567.