Linguistic simplification: A promising test accommodation for LEP students?

Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation

Volumn 8, Issue 7, 2003, Pages

  Stansfield, Charles W ^a  

^a Second Language Testing ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893485586     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15317714     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Abedi, J., Lord, C., & Hofstetter, C. (1998). Impact of Selected Background Variables on Students' NAEP Math Performance. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation/National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing.
2. Association Européene de Constructeurs de Matérial Aerospatiale (1972). AECMA Simplified English Document: A Guide for the Preparation of Aircraft Maintenance Procedures in the International Aerospace Maintenance Language. AIA Issue, Change 4.
3. Kiplinger, V.L., Haug, C.A., & Abedi, J. (2000). A Math Assessment Should Assess Math, Not Reading: One State's Approach to the Problem. Paper presented at the 30th National Conference on Large Scale Assessment, Snowbird, UT, June 25-28.
4. Ogden, C.K. (1932). Basic English, A General Introduction with Rules and Grammar. London: Paul Treber & Co.
5. Rivera, C., & Stansfield, C.W. (2001). The Effects of Linguistic Simplification of Science Test Items on Performance of Limited English Proficient and Monolingual English-Speaking Students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
6. Rivera, C., Vincent, C., Hafner, A., & LaCelle-Peterson, M. (1997). Statewide Assessment Programs: Policies and Practices for the Inclusion of Limited English Proficient Students. ERIC Digest. Washington D.C.: ERIC Clearinghouse on Language and Linguistics. ED 362 073.
7. Rivera, C., & Vincent, C. (1997). High school graduation testing: Policies and practices in the assessment of English language learners. Educational Assessment, 4 (4): 335-55.
8. Shubert, J.K., et al. (1995). "The Comprehensibility of Simplified English in Procedures." Technical Writing and Communication, 25 (4): 347-369.