Integrated assessment of biological invasions

Ecological Applications

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 25-37

  Ibáñez, Inés ^a   Diez, Jeffrey M ^a,b   Miller, Luke P ^c   Olden, Julian D ^d   Sorte, Cascade J B ^e   Blumenthal, Dana M ^f   Bradley, Bethany A ^g   D'antonio, Carla M ^h   Dukes, Jeffrey S ⁱ   Early, Regan I ^j   Grosholz, Edwin D ^k   Lawler, Joshua J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

^f AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

ⁱ PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF ÉVORA   (Portugal)

^k UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Celastrus orbiculatus; Colonization phase; Demographic framework; Dispersal phase; Hierarchical Bayesian models; Invasive species management; Multiple scales; Mytilus galloprovincialis; Orconectes rusticus; Proliferation phase; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; BIVALVE; COLONIZATION; CRAYFISH; DEMOGRAPHIC SURVEY; ECONOMIC IMPACT; HABITAT TYPE; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; RISK ASSESSMENT; VINE;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELASTRUS; CRAYFISH; DEMOGRAPHY; INTRODUCED SPECIES; MYTILUS; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; ASTACOIDEA; CELASTRUS; DEMOGRAPHY; INTRODUCED SPECIES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MYTILUS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84893420442     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/13-0776.1     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Albright, T. P., D. P. Anderson, N. S. Keuler, S. M. Pearson, and M. G. Turner. 2009. The spatial legacy of introduction: Celastrus orbiculatus in the southern Appalachians, USA. Journal of Applied Ecology 46:1229-1238.
2. Besaw, L. M., G. C. Thelen, S. Sutherland, K. Metlen, and R. M. Callaway. 2011. Disturbance, resource pulses and invasion: short-term shifts in competitive effects, not growth responses, favour exotic annuals. Journal of Applied Ecology 48:998-1006.
3. Blumenthal, D., C. E. Mitchell, P. Pysek, and V. Jarosik. 2009. Synergy between pathogen release and resource availability in plant invasion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106:7899-7904.
4. Bradley, B. A., et al. 2012. Global change, global trade, and the next wave of plant invasions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10:20-28.
5. Branch, G. M., and C. N. Steffani. 2004. Can we predict the effects of alien species? A case-history of the invasion of South Africa by Mytilus galloprovincialis (Lamarck). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 300:189-215.
6. Brook, B. W., H. R. Akcakaya, D. A. Keith, G. M. Mace, R. G. Pearson, and M. B. Araujo. 2009. Integrating bioclimate with population models to improve forecasts of species extinctions under climate change. Biology Letters 23:723-725.
7. Carlton, J. T. 1992. Introduced marine and estuarine mollusks of North America: an end-of-the-20th-century perspective. Journal of Shellfish Research 11:489-505.
8. Clark, J. S. 2005. Why environmental scientists are becoming Bayesians. Ecology Letters 8:2-14.
9. Clark, J. S., et al. 2010. High-dimensional coexistence based on individual variation: a synthesis of evidence. Ecological Monographs 80:569-608.
10. Clark, J. S., and A. E. E. Gelfand. 2006. Hierarchical Modelling for the Environmental Sciences Statistical methods and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
11. Cressie, N., C. A. Calder, J. S. Clark, J. M. V. Hoef, and C. K. Wikle. 2009. Accounting for uncertainty in ecological analysis: the strengths and limitations of hierarchical statistical modeling. Ecological Applications 19:553-570.
12. Daehler, C. C. 2003. Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien plants: Implications for conservation and restoration. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34:183-211.
13. Davis, M. A., J. P. Grime, and K. Thompson. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. Journal of Ecology 88:528-536.
14. DeGasperis, B. G., and G. Motzkin. 2007. Windows of opportunity: historical and ecological controls on Berberis thunbergii invasions. Ecology 88:3115-3125.
15. Diez, J. M., et al. 2012. Will extreme climatic events facilitate biological invasions? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10:249-257.
16. Dukes, J. S., et al. 2009. Responses of insect pests, pathogens, and invasive plant species to climate change in the forests of northeastern North America: What can we predict? Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39:231-248.
17. Early, R., and D. F. Sax. 2011. Analysis of climate paths reveals potential limitations on species range shifts. Ecology Letters 14:1125-1133.
18. Ellsworth, J. W., R. A. Harrington, and J. H. Fownes. 2004. Survival, growth and gas exchange of Celastrus orbiculatus seedlings in sun and shade. American Midland Naturalist 151:233-240.
19. Feldman, G., and C. McClain. 2012. Ocean Color Web,MODISAqua Reprocessing R2010.0. N. Kuring and S. W. Bailey, editors. http://gcmd.gsfc.nasa.gov/ KeywordSearch/Keywords. do?Portal=GCMD&KeywordPath=ParametersjOCEANSj OCEAN+CHEMISTRYjCHLOROPHYLL&MetadataType= 0&Columns=0&lbnode= mdlb6#maincontent
20. Foxcroft, L. C., S. T. A. Pickett, and M. L. Cadenasso. 2011. Expanding the conceptual frameworks of plant invasion ecology. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 13:89-100.
21. Franklin, J. 2010. Moving beyond static species distribution models in support of conservation biogeography. Diversity and Distributions 16:321-330.
22. Gelman, A., and J. Hill. 2007. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA.
23. Greenberg, C. H., L. M. Smith, and D. J. Levey. 2001. Fruit fate, seed germination and growth of an invasive vine - an experimental test of "sit and wait" strategy. Biological Invasions 3:363-372.
24. Gurevitch, J., G. A. Fox, G. M. Wardle, and T. D. Inderjit. 2011. Emergent insights from the synthesis of conceptual frameworks for biological invasions. Ecology Letters 14:407-418.
25. Hobbs, R. J., and L. F. Huenneke. 1992. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 6:324-337.
26. Huntley, B., et al. 2010. Beyond bioclimatic envelopes: dynamic species' range and abundance modelling in the context of climatic change. Ecography 33:621-626.
27. Ibáñez, I., J. A. Silander, J. M. Allen, S. A. Treanor, and A. Wilson. 2009b. Identifying hotspots for plant invasions and forecasting focal points of further spread. Journal of Applied Ecology 46:1219-1228.
28. Ibáñez, I., J. A. Silander, A. M. Wilson, N. LaFleur, N. Tanaka, and I. Tsuyama. 2009a. Multivariate forecasts of potential distributions of invasive plant species. Ecological Applications 19:359-375.
29. Keith, D. A., H. R. Akçakaya, W. Thuiller, G. F. Midgley, R. G. Pearson, S. J. Phillips, H. M. Regan, M. B. Araú jo, and T. G. Rebelo. 2008. Predicting extinction risks under climate change: coupling stochastic population models with dynamic bioclimatic habitat models. Biology Letters 4:560-563.
30. LaDeau, S. L., G. E. Glass, N. T. Hobbs, A. Latimer, and R. S. Ostfeld. 2011. Data-model fusion to better understand emerging pathogens and improve infectious disease forecasting. Ecological Applications 21:1443-1460.
31. Lafleur, N. E., M. A. Rubega, and C. S. Elphick. 2007. Invasive fruits, novel foods, and choice: an investigation of European starling and American Robin frugivory. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 119:429-438.
32. Leicht, S. A., and J. A. Silander. 2006. Differential responses of invasive Celastrus orbiculatus (Celastraceae) and native C. scandens to changes in light quality. American Journal of Botany 93:972-977.
33. Leicht-Young, S. A., J. A. Silander, and A. M. Latimer. 2007. Comparative performance of invasive and native Celastrus species across environmental gradients. Oecologia 154:273- 282.
34. Leung, B., et al. 2012. TEASIng apart alien species risk assessments: a framework for best practices. Ecology Letters 15:1475-1493.
35. Levine, J. M., and C. M. D'Antonio. 2003. Forecasting biological invasions with increasing international trade. Conservation Biology 17:322-326.
36. Lockwood, B. L., and G. N. Somero. 2011. Invasive and native blue mussels (genus Mytilus) on the California coast: the role of physiology in a biological invasion. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 400:167-174.
37. Lodge, D. M., J. W. Kershner, J. E. Aloi, and A. P. Covich. 1994. Effects of an omnivorous crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) on a freshwater littoral food web. Ecology 75:1265-1281.
38. Lodge, D. M., et al. 2006. Biological invasions: Recommendations for U.S. policy and management. Ecological Applications 16:2035-2054.
39. Luo, Y., K. Ogle, C. Tucker, S. Fei, C. Gao, S. LaDeau, J. S. Clark, and D. S. Schimel. 2011. Ecological forecasting and data assimilation in a data-rich era. Ecological Applications 21:1429-1442.
40. Mack, R. N., D. Simberloff, W. M. Lonsdale, H. Evans, M. Clout, and F. A. Bazzaz. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 10:689-710.
41. McCarthy, J. M., C. L. Hein, J. D. Olden, and M. J. Vander Zanden. 2006. Coupling long-term studies with meta-analysis to investigate impacts of non-native crayfish on zoobenthic communities. Freshwater Biology 51:224-235.
42. Mehrhoff, L. J., J. A. Silander, Jr., S. A. Leicht-Young, E. S. Mosher, and N. M. Tabak. 2003. IPANE: invasive plant atlas of New England. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA. http://www.ipane.org
43. Mosher, E. S., J. A. Silander, Jr., and A. Latimer. 2009. The role of land-use history in major invasions by woody plant species in the northeastern North American Landscape. Biological Invasions 11:2317-2328.
44. Olden, J. D., J. M. McCarthy, J. T. Maxted, W. W. Fetzer, and M. J. Vander Zanden. 2006. The rapid spread of rusty crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) with observations on native crayfish declines in Wisconsin (USA) over the past 130 years. Biological Invasions 8:1621-1628.
45. Olden, J. D., M. J. Vander Zanden, and P. T. J. Johnson. 2011. Assessing ecosystem vulnerability to invasive rusty crayfish (Orconectes rusticus). Ecological Applications 21:2587-2599.
46. Olsen, T. M., D. M. Lodge, G. M. Capelli, and R. J. Houlihan. 1991. Mechanisms of impact of an introduced crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) on littoral congeners, snails, and macrophytes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48:1853-1861.
47. Papesx, M., M. Sallstrom, T. R. Asplund, and M. J. Vander Zanden. 2011. Invasive species research to meet the needs of resource management and planning. Conservation Biology 25:867-872.
48. Pearson, R. G., and T. P. Dawson. 2003. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: Are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecology and Biogeography 12:361-371.
49. Peterson, A. T., and D. A. Vieglais. 2001. Predicting species invasions using ecological niche modeling: new approaches from bioinformatics attack a pressing problem. BioScience 51:363-371.
50. Rothlisberger, J. D., W. L. Chadderton, J. McNulty, and D. M. Lodge. 2010. Aquatic invasive species transport via trailered boats: what is being moved, who is moving it, and what can be done. Fisheries 35:121-132.
51. Sala, O., et al. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios of the year 2100. Science 287:1770-1774.
52. Shea, K., and P. Chesson. 2002. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:170-176.
53. Sher, A. A., and L. A. Hyatt. 1999. The disturbed resource-flux invasion matrix: a new framework for patterns of plant invasion. Biological Invasions 1:107-114.
54. Simberloff, D. 2009. The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40:81-102.
55. Somero, G. N. 2012. The physiology of global change: linking patterns to mechanisms. Annual Review of Marine Science 4:39-61.
56. Sorte, C. J. B., et al. 2013. Poised to prosper? A cross-system comparison of climate change effects on native and nonnative species performance. Ecology Letters 16:260-271.
57. Spiegelhalter, D. J., N. Best, B. P. Carlin, and A. V. D. Linde. 2000. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 64:583-639.
58. Vander Zanden, M. J., and J. D. Olden. 2008. A management framework for preventing the secondary spread of aquatic invasive species. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 65:1512-1522.
59. van Erkom Schurink, C., and C. L. Griffiths. Factors affecting relative rates of growth in four South African mussel species. Aquaculture International 109:257-273.
60. Vitousek, P. M., H. A. Mooney, J. Lubchenco, and J. M. Melillo. 1997. Human domination of Earth's ecosystems. Science 277:494-499.