CFD shape optimization using an incomplete-gradient adjoint formulation

European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, ECCOMAS 2000

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages

  Soto, Orlando A ^a   Löhner, Rainald ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adjoint formulation; Incompressible flow; Shape optimization

Indexed keywords

ADJOINT EQUATIONS; ADJOINT FORMULATION; DESIGN METHODOLOGY; DESIGN PARAMETERS; GEOMETRY REPRESENTATION; INCOMPRESSIBLE EULER EQUATIONS; OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS; PARTIAL DERIVATIVES;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION;

DESIGN;

EID: 84893404611     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. W. Anderson and D. Bonhaus. Airfoil design on unstructured grids for turbulent flows. NASA TM 112867, 1997.
2. W. Anderson and V. Venkatakrishnan. Aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured grids with a continuous adjoint formulation. ICASE report No. 97-9, 1997.
3. O. Baysal and M. Eleshaky. Aerodynamic sensitivities analysis methods for the compressible Euler equations. J. of Fluids Engineering, 113:681-688, 1991.
4. M. Behr and T. Tezduyar. Finite element solution strategies for large-scale flow simulations. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 112:3-24, 1994.
5. J. Borggaard, J. Burns, E. Cliff, and M. Gunzburger. Sensitivity calculation for a 2-d inviscid supersonic forebody problem. Identification and Control Systems Governed by Partial Differential Equations, pages pages 14-24, 1993.
6. D. Braess. Finite elements. Theory, fast solvers, and applications in solid mechanics. Cambridge University Press, 1997.
7. G. Burgreen and O. Baysal. Aerodynamic shape optimization using preconditioned conjugate gradient methods. AIAA-93-3322, 1993.
8. R. Codina. A stabilized finite element method for generalized stationary incompressible flows. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., Accepted for publication, 1999.
9. J. Elliot and J. Peraire. Practical three-dimensional aerodynamic design and optimization using unstructured meshes. AIAA journal, 35:1479-1485, 1997.
10. L. Franca and S. Frey. Stabilized finite element methods: II. The incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 99:209-133, 1992.
11. L. Franca and T. Hughes. Two classes of mixed finite element methods. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 69:89-129, 1988.
12. L. Franca and R. Stenberg. Error analysis of some Galerkin least-squares methods for the eleasticity equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 28:1680-1697, 1991.
13. R. Glowinski and O. Pironneau. On the numerical computation of the minimum-drag profile in laminar flow. J. Fluid Mech., 72:385-389, 1975.
14. G. Hou, V. Maroju, A. Taylor, and V. Korivi. Transonic turbulent airfoil design optimization with automatic differentiation in incremental iterative forms. AIAA- 95-1692, 1995.
15. T. Hughes and L. Franca. A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: VII. The Stokes problem with various well-posed boundary conditions: symmetric formulation that converge for all velocity/pressure spaces. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 65:85-96, 1987.
16. T. Hughes, L. Franca, and M. Balestra. A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: V. circunvecting the babušca brezzi condition: A stable Petrov-Galerkin formulation for the Stokes problem accomodating equal-order interpolations. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 59:85-99, 1986.
17. T. Hughes, L. Franca, and G. Hulbert. A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: VIII. The Galerkin least-squares method for advective-diffusive equations. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 73:173-189, 1989.
18. A. Jameson. Optimum aerodynamic design using CFD and control theory. AIAA- 95-1729-CP, 1995.
19. G. Kuruvila, S. Ta'asan, and M. Salas. Airfoil design and optimization by the oneshot method. AIAA-95-0478, 1995.
20. R. Löhner and C. Yang. Improved ALE mesh velocities for moving bodies. Comm. in Numer. Meth. Engrg, 12:599-608, 1996.
21. R. Löhner, C. Yang, E. Oñate, and S. Idelsohn. An unstructured grid-based, parallel free surface solver. GMU/CSI - CIMNE, pages 1-23, 1996.
22. R. Löhner, C. Yang, E. Oñate, and S. Idelsohn. An unstructured grid-based, paralell free surface solver. AIAA-97-1830, 1997.
23. T. Matsuzawa and H. Hafez. Treatment of shock waves in design optimization via adjoint equation approach. AIAA-98-2537, 1998.
24. B. Mohammadi. Dynamical approaches and incomplete gradients for shape optimization and flow control. AIAA-99-3374, 1999.
25. R. Narducci, B. Grossman, M. Valorani, A. Dadone, and R. Haftka. Optimization methods for non-smooth or noisy objective functions in fluid design problems. AIAA- 95-1648-CP, 1995.
26. J. Newman and A. Taylor. Three-dimensional aerodynamic shape sensitivity analysis and design optimization using Euler equations on unstructured grids. AIAA-96-2464, 1996.
27. E. Nielsen. Aerodynamic design sensitivities on an unstructured mesh using the Navier-Stokes equations and a discrete adjoint formulation. PhD thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1998.
28. E. Nielsen and W. Anderson. Aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured meshes using the Navier-Stokes equations. AIAA-98-4809, 1998.
29. O. Pironneau. On optimum profiles in Stokes flow. J. Fluid Mech., 59:117-128, 1973.
30. O. Pironneau. On optimum profiles in Fluid Mechanics. J. Fluid Mech., 64:97-110, 1974.
31. R. Ramamurti and R. Löhner. A paralell implicit incompressible flow solver using unstructured meshes. Computer and Fluids, 5:119-132, 1996.
32. J. Reuter, J. Alonso, J. Martins, and S. Smith. A couple aero-structural optimization method for complete aircraft configurations. AIAA-99-0187, 1999.
33. J. Reuter, A. Jameson, J. Alonso, M. Rimlinger, and D. Saunders. Constrained multipoint aerodynamic shape optimization using and adjoint formulation and paralell computers. AIAA-97-0103, 1997.
34. J. Reuter, A. Jameson, J. Farmer, L. Martinelli, and D. Saunders. Aerodynamic shape optimization of complex aircraft configurations via an adjoint formulation. AIAA-96-0094, 1996.
35. M. Rizk. CFD optimization by sensitivity derivatives evaluated from finite-difference jacobians. AIAA-95-1691-CP, 1995.
36. L. Sherman, C. Taylor, L. Green, P. Newman, G. Hou, and V. Korivi. First and second order aerodynamic sensitivity derivatives via automatic differentiation with incremental iterative methods. AIAA-94-4262, 1994.
37. O. Soto and R. Löhner. CFD optimization using an incomplete-gradient adjoint approach. AIAA-00-0666, 2000.
38. G. Taubin. A signal processing approach to fair surface design. IBM Research Report, 1995.
39. B. van Leer. Towards the ultimate conservative scheme. II. Monotonicity and conservation combined in a second order scheme. J. Comput. Phys., 14:361-370, 1974.
40. D. Young, W. Huffman, R. Melvin, M. Bieterman, C. Hilmes, and F. Johnson. Inexactness and global convergence in design optimization. AIAA-94-4386, 1994.