Quality of patient health information on the internet: Reviewing a complex and evolving landscape

Australasian Medical Journal

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 24-28

  Fahy, Eamonn ^a   Hardikar, Rohan ^a,b   Fox, Adrian ^a   Mackay, Sean ^a,b  

^a EASTERN HEALTH   (Australia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Health; Internet; Patient information; Quality evaluation

Indexed keywords

DATA BASE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERNET; LITERATURE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PATIENT; REVIEW; SEARCH ENGINE;

EID: 84893400658     PISSN: 18361935     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4066/AMJ.2014.1900     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. International Telecommunications Union. World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database 2013 17th Ed [cited 2013 July 5]. Available from: http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/statistics/2013/ITU_Key_2005-2013_ICT_data.xls
2. Pallen M. Guide to the Internet: The world wide web. BMJ 1995;311:1552. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7019.1552
3. Impicciatore P, Pandolfini C, Casella N, Bonati M. Reliability of health information for the public on the World Wide Web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home. BMJ. 1997 Jun 28;314(7098):1875-9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1875
4. Eysenbach G. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002 May 22-29;287(20):2691-700. doi:10.1001/jama.287.20.2691.
5. Burkell J. Health Information Seals of Approval: What do they Signify? Information, Communication & Society. 2004 December; 7(4): 491-509. doi: 10.1080/1369118042000305610
6. Bernstam EV. Instruments to assess the quality of health information on the World Wide Web: what can our patients actually use? Int J Med Inform. 2005 Jan;74(1):13-9.
7. Jadad AR. Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? JAMA. 1998 Feb 25;279(8):611-4. doi:10.1001/jama.279.8.611.
8. Boyer C, Baujard V, Geissbuhler A. Evolution of health web certification through the HONcode experience. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:53-7.
9. Mousiolis A. Polycystic ovary syndrome: double click and right check. What do patients learn from the Internet about PCOS? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Jul;163(1):43-6.
10. Nason G. Scoliosis Specific Information on the Internet-has the 'Information Highway' Led to Better Information Provision? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jul 4.
11. Soobrah R. Your patient information website: How good is it? Colorectal Dis. 2012 Mar;14(3):e90-4. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02792.x
12. Meric F. Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites. BMJ. 2002 Mar 9;324(7337):577-81. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7337.577
13. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet. JAMA. 1997; 277:1244-1245. doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540390074039.
14. Barker S. Accuracy of internet recommendations for prehospital care of venomous snake bites. Wilderness Environ Med. 2010 Dec;21(4):298-302.
15. Rao NR, Mohapatra M, Mishra S, Joshi A. Evaluation of dengue-related health information on the internet. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2012;9:1c. Epub 2012 Apr 1.
16. Eysenbach G, Köhler C. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ. 2002 Mar 9;324(7337):573-7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7337.573.
17. Alexa. Top Sites - The top 500 sites on the web. [Internet]. [Cited May 2013] Available from: http://www.alexa.com/topsites
18. Brin S, Page L. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 1998;30:107-17.
19. Pérez-López FR. An evaluation of the contents and quality of menopause information on the World Wide Web. Maturitas. 2004 Dec 10;49(4):276-82.
20. Pérez-López FR, Pérez Roncero GR. Assessing the content and quality of information on the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis on the World Wide Web. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2006 Dec;22(12):669-75.
21. Heilman JM, Kemmann E, Bonert M, Chatterjee A, Ragar B, Beards GM, Iberri DJ, Harvey M, Thomas B, Stomp W, Martone MF, Lodge DJ, Vondracek A, de Wolff JF, Liber C, Grover SC, Vickers TJ, Meskó B, Laurent MR. Wikipedia: a key tool for global public health promotion. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jan 31;13(1):e14. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1589.
22. Laurent MR, Vickers TJ. Seeking health information online: does Wikipedia matter? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):471-9. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3059
23. Kint M, Hart DP. Should clinicians edit Wikipedia to engage a wider world web? [Letter] Brit Med J. 2012 Jul 3;345. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4275
24. Rajagopalan MS, Khanna VK, Leiter Y, Stott M, Showalter TN, Dicker AP, Lawrence YR. Patient-oriented cancer information on the internet: a comparison of wikipedia and a professionally maintained database. J Oncol Pract. 2011 Sep;7(5):319-23. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2010.000209
25. Leithner A, Maurer-Ertl W, Glehr M, Friesenbichler J, Leithner K, Windhager R. Wikipedia and osteosarcoma: a trustworthy patients' information? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jul-Aug;17(4):373-4. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.004507.