Percutaneous cholecystostomy for high-risk surgical patients with acute calculous cholecystitis

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2013, Issue 8, 2013, Pages

  Gurusamy, Kurinchi Selvan ^a   Rossi, Michele ^b   Davidson, Brian R ^a  

^a ROYAL FREE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b Careggi Academic and Regional Hospital of Florence   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

ACUTE CALCULOUS CHOLECYSTITIS; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; CHOLECYSTITIS; CHOLECYSTOSTOMY; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; GALLSTONE; HEALTH CARE COST; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECURRENT DISEASE; REVIEW; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SURGICAL PATIENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CHOLECYSTITIS, ACUTE; CHOLECYSTOLITHIASIS; COMPLICATION; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; META ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); TIME; UTILIZATION; ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS; CHOLELITHIASIS; METHODOLOGY; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; CHOLECYSTITIS, ACUTE; CHOLECYSTOLITHIASIS; CHOLECYSTOSTOMY; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84893380802     PISSN: 14651858     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007088.pub2     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Akyürek N, Salman B, Yuksel O, Tezcaner T, Irkorucu O, Yucel C, et al. Management of acute calculous cholecystitis in high-risk patients - percutaneous cholecystotomy followed by early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques 2005;15(6):315-20.
2. Hatzidakis AA, Prassopoulos P, Petinarakis I, Sanidas E, Chrysos E, Chalkiadakis G, et al. Acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients: percutaneous cholecystostomy vs conservative treatment. European Radiology 2002;12(7):1778-84.
3. Nikonov PV, Slepykh NI. Optimization of treatment of acute cholecystitis in elderly and senile patients. Vestnik Khirurgii Imeni I. I. Grekova 2008;167(5):71-5.
4. Tazawa J, Sanada K, Maekawa S, Sakai Y, Yamane M, Kusano F, et al. Gallbladder aspiration for acute cholecystitis in high-surgical-risk patients. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2003;18(4):463-5.
5. Schmidt M, Sondenaa K, Vetrhus M, Berhane T, Eide GE. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of observation versus surgery for acute cholecystitis: non-operative management is an option in some patients. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 2011;46(10):1257-62.
6. Vetrhus M, Soreide O, Nesvik I, Sondenaa K. Acute cholecystitis: delayed surgery or observation. A randomized clinical trial. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 2003;38(9):985-90.
7. Kortram K, van Ramshorst B, Bollen TL, Besselink MG, Gouma DJ, Karsten T, et al. Acute cholecystitis in high risk surgical patients: percutaneous cholecystostomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CHOCOLATE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2012;13:7.
8. Brok J, Thorlund K, Gluud C, Wetterslev J. Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008;61:763-9.
9. Brok J, Thorlund K, Wetterslev J, Gluud C. Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive - Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses. International Journal of Epidemiology 2009;38(1):287-98.
10. Buanes T, Waage A, Mjaland O, Solheim K. Bile leak after cholecystectomy significance and treatment: results from the National Norwegian Cholecystectomy Registry. International Surgery 1996;81(3):276-9.
11. Copenhagen Trial Unit. TSA - Trial Sequential Analysis. http://ctu.dk/tsa/2011 (accessed 17 June 2013).
12. Curro G, Cucinotta E. Percutaneous gall bladder aspiration as an alternative to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Child-Pugh C cirrhotic patients with acute cholecystitis. Gut 2006;55(6):898-9.
13. DeMets DL. Methods for combining randomized clinical trials: strengths and limitations. Statistics in Medicine 1987;6(3):341-50.
14. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1986;7(3):177-88.
15. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 1997;315(7109):629-34.
16. Fletcher DR, Hobbs MS, Tan P, Valinsky LJ, Hockey RL, Pikora TJ, et al. Complications of cholecystectomy: risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography: a population-based study. Annals of Surgery 1999;229(4):449-57.
17. Fullarton GM, Bell G. Prospective audit of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the west of Scotland. West of Scotland Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Audit Group. Gut 1994;35(8):1121-6.
18. Gluud C, Nikolova D, Klingenberg SL, Alexakis N, Als-Nielsen B, Colli A, et al. Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group. About The Cochrane Collaboration (Cochrane Review Groups (CRGs)). 2013, Issue 5. Art. No.: LIVER.
19. Griffin S, Claxton K, Sculpher M. Decision analysis for resource allocation in health care. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 2008;13(Suppl 3):23-30.
20. Gurusamy KS, Samraj K. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005440.pub2]
21. Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidson BR. Abdominal lift for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006574.pub2]
22. Gurusamy KS, Gluud C, Nikolova D, Davidson BR. Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery. British Journal of Surgery 2009;96(4):342-9.
23. Halldestam I, Enell EL, Kullman E, Borch K. Development of symptoms and complications in individuals with asymptomatic gallstones. British Journal of Surgery 2004;91(6):734-8.
24. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2002;21(11):1539-58.
25. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Colloboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
26. Hirota M, Takada T, Kawarada Y, Nimura Y, Miura F, Hirata K, et al. Diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2007;14(1):78-82.
27. International Conference on Harmonisation Expert Working Group. International conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. ICH harmonised tripartite guideline. Guideline for good clinical practice CFR & ICH Guidelines. Vol. 1, PA 19063-2043, USA: Barnett International/PAREXEL, 1997.
28. Johansson M, Thune A, Blomqvist A, Nelvin L, Lundell L. Management of acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2003;7(5):642-5.
29. Keus F, de Jong J, Gooszen HG, Laarhoven CJHM. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006231]
30. Keus F, de Jong J, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CHJM. Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006229]
31. Keus F, de Jong J, Gooszen HG, Laarhoven CJHM. Small-incision versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004788.pub2]
32. Keus F, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJHM. Open, small-incision, or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. An overview of Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008318]
33. Kimura T, Suzuki K, Umehara Y, Kawabe A, Wada H. Features and management of bile leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2005;12(1):61-4.
34. Kjaergard LL, Villumsen J, Gluud C. Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. Annals of Internal Medicine 2001;135(11):982-9.
35. Krahenbuhl L, Sclabas G, Wente MN, Schafer M, Schlumpf R, Buchler MW. Incidence, risk factors, and prevention of biliary tract injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Switzerland. World Journal of Surgery 2001;25(10):1325-30.
36. Livingston EH, Rege RV. A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. American Journal of Surgery 2004;188(3):205-11.
37. Lundh A, Sismondo S, Lexchin J, Busuioc OA, Bero L. Industry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub2]
38. Macaskill P, Walter SD, Irwig L. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2001;20(4):641-54.
39. Macri A, Scuderi G, Saladino E, Trimarchi G, Terranova M, Versaci A, et al. Acute gallstone cholecystitis in the elderly: treatment with emergency ultrasonographic percutaneous cholecystostomy and interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical Endoscopy 2006;20(1):88-91.
40. McAlister VC, Davenport E, Renouf E. Cholecystectomy deferral in patients with endoscopic sphincterotomy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006233]
41. Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?. Lancet 1998;352(9128):609-13.
42. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2010;63(8):e1-e37.
43. Newell DJ. Intention-to-treat analysis: implications for quantitative and qualitative research. International Journal of Epidemiology 1992;21(5):837-41.
44. National Institutes of Health. NIH consensus statement on gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. consensus.nih.gov/1992/1992GallstonesLaparoscopy090html.htm 1992 (accessed 13 June 2013).
45. Ozturk E, Yilmazlar T. Factors affecting the mortality risk in elderly patients undergoing surgery. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 2007;77(3):156-9.
46. Parker MJ, Gurusamy K, Stoker M. Surgery in elderly patients. Current Orthopaedics 2004;18(5):333-44.
47. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.
48. Richardson MC, Bell G, Fullarton GM. Incidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 5913 cases. West of Scotland Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Audit Group. British Journal of Surgery 1996;83(10):1356-60.
49. Royle P, Milne R. Literature searching for randomized controlled trials used in Cochrane reviews: rapid versus exhaustive searches. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2003;19(4):591-603.
50. Savović J, Jones HE, Altman DG, Harris RJ, Jüni P, Pildal J, et al. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Health Technology Assessment 2012;16(35):1-82.
51. Savović J, Jones HE, Altman DG, Harris RJ, Jüni P, Pildal J, et al. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Annals of Internal Medicine 2012;157(6):429-38.
52. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995;273(5):408-12.
53. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2010;63(8):834-40.
54. Chan AW, TetzlaffJM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013;158:200-7.
55. Stefanidis D, Sirinek KR, Bingener J. Gallbladder perforation: risk factors and outcome. Journal of Surgical Research 2006;131(2):204-8.
56. Thorlund K, Devereaux PJ, Wetterslev J, Guyatt G, Ioannidis JP, Thabane L, et al. Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses. International Journal of Epidemiology 2009;38(1):276-86.
57. Thorlund K, Anema A, Mills E. Interpreting meta-analysis according to the adequacy of sample size. An example using isoniazid chemoprophylaxis for tuberculosis in purified protein derivative negative HIV-infected individuals. Clinical Epidemiology 2010;2:57-66.
58. Thorlund K, Engstrøm J, Wetterslev J, Brok J, Imberger G, Gluud C. User manual forTrial Sequential Analysis (TSA). http://ctu.dk/tsa/files/tsa_manual.pdf 2011 (accessed 23 April 2013).
59. Uecker J, Adams M, Skipper K, Dunn E. Cholecystitis in the octogenarian: is laparoscopic cholecystectomy the best approach?. American Surgeon 2001;67(7):637-40.
60. Wetterslev J, Thorlund K, Brok J, Gluud C. Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008;61(1):64-75.
61. Wetterslev J, Thorlund K, Brok J, Gluud C. Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in a random-effects meta-analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2009;9:86.
62. Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, Schulz KF, Jüni P, Altman GD, et al. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2008;336:601-5.
63. Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Solomkin JS, Mayumi T, Gomi H, et al. New diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholecystitis in revised Tokyo Guidelines. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences 2012;19(5):578-85.