Internal versus external tocodynamometry during induced or augmented labour

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2013, Issue 8, 2013, Pages

  Bakker, Jannet J H ^a   Janssen, Petra F ^b   Van Halem, Karlijn ^a   Van der Goes, Birgit Y ^a   Papatsonis, Dimitri Nm ^c   Van der Post, Joris Am ^a   Mol, Ben Willem J ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c AMPHIA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OXYTOCIN; OXYTOCIC AGENT;

AMNION FLUID EMBOLISM; APGAR SCORE; CESAREAN SECTION; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; EXTERNAL TOCODYNAMOMETRY; FORCEPS DELIVERY; GYNECOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INTERNAL TOCODYNAMOMETRY; LABOR INDUCTION; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UMBILICAL ARTERY; UTERUS CONTRACTION; VACUUM EXTRACTION; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; FETUS MONITORING; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; DEVICES; PROCEDURES;

FEMALE; HUMANS; INJECTIONS, INTRAVENOUS; LABOR, INDUCED; OXYTOCICS; OXYTOCIN; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; UTERINE CONTRACTION; UTERINE MONITORING;

EID: 84893362705     PISSN: 14651858     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006947.pub3     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Bakker JJH, Verhoeven CJM, Janssen PF, Van Lith JM, Van Oudgaarden ED, Bloemenkamp KWM, et al. Outcomes after internal versus external tocodynamometry for monitoring labor. The New England Journal of Medicine 2010;362(4):306-13.
2. Van der Post JAM, Bakker JJH. Intra uterine pressure monitoring for augmentation or induction of labour with intravenous oxytocin: benefits and costs. Netherlands Trial Register (http://www.trialregister.nl) (accessed 1 November 2005).
3. Van Halem K, Bakker JJH, Verhoeven CJ, Papatsonis DN, Van Oudgaarden ED, Janssen PF, et al. Does use of an intrauterine catheter during labour increase risk of infection?. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2011 June 7 [Epub ahead of print].
4. Chia YT, Arulkumaran S, Soon SB, Norshida S, Ratnam SS. Induction of labour: does internal tocography result in better obstetric outcome than external tocography. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 1993;33:159-61.
5. Chua S, Kurup A, Arulkumaran S, Ratnam SS. Augmentation of labor: does internal tocography result in better obstetric outcome than external tocography?. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1990;76:164-7.
6. Chua S, Kurup A, Arulkumaran S, Ratnam SS. Augmentation of labour: internal tocography does not result in better obstetric outcome than external tocography. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 1991;36 Suppl:368.
7. Arulkumaran S, Yang M, Tien CY, Ratnam SS. Reliability of intrauterine pressure measurements. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1991;78(5):800-2.
8. Bsat F, Warsof S. Comparison of extraovular and intraovular uterine contraction monitoring. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1991;164:252.
9. Bsat FA, Warsof S. Extraovular and intraovular uterine contraction monitoring: a comparison. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1992;37(9):813-6.
10. Chua S, Arulkumaran S, Yang M, Ratnam SS, Steer PJ. The accuracy of catheter-tip pressure transducers for the measurement of intrauterine pressure in labour. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1992;99:186-9.
11. Chua S, Lee M, Vanaja K, Chong YS, Nordstrom L, Arulkumaran S. The reliability of catheter-tip transducers for the measurement of intrauterine pressure in the third stage of labour. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1998;105:352-6.
12. Lemus J, Balducci J, Atlas R, Klasko S. The use of intrauterine pressure catheters in active management of labor. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997;176(1 Pt 2):S142.
13. Panayotopoulos N, Salamalekis E, Vitoratos N, Loghis C, Kassanos D. Monitoring of uterine activity in cases of labor augmentation, and neonatal outcome. Prenatal and Neonatal Medicine 1998;3:464-7.
14. Sciscione A, Rhee A, Duhl A, Pollock M, Hoffman M, Colmorgen G. Intrauterine pressure catheters (IUPC) and the risk of extra-ovular placement and resultant placental separation [abstract]. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2001;185(6 Suppl):S91.
15. Sciscione A, Rhee A, Duhl A, Pollock M, Maas B, Manley J, et al. A randomized prospective trial of two types of intrauterine pressure catheters and the rate of extra-ovular placement. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000;182(1 Pt 2):S154.
16. Sciscione AC, Duhl A, Pollock MA, Hoffman MK, Rhee A, Colmorgen GH. Extramembranous placement of an air-coupled vs. transducer-tipped intrauterine pressure catheter. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2005;50(8):578-84.
17. Teplick F. Assessment of an alternative stabilization device for electronic fetal monitoring utilizing external ultrasound and tocodynamometer in labor and delivery patients. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing 2012;41:S140.
18. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology Committee on Practice Bulletins. Dystocia and Augmentation of Labor. ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 49. ACOG, 2009.
19. Alfirevic Z, Kelly A, Dowswell T. Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003246.pub2]
20. Bakker PC, Zikkenheimer M, Van Geijn HP. The quality of intrapartum uterine activity monitoring. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 2008;36(3):197-201.
21. Chan WH, Paul RH, Toews J. Intrapartum fetal monitoring: maternal and fetal morbidity and perinatal mortality. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1973;41:7-13.
22. Dale HH. On some physiological actions of ergot. Journal of Physiology 1906;34(3):163-206.
23. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315(7109):629-34.
24. Handwerker SM, Selick AM. Placental abruption after insertion of catheter tip intrauterine pressure transducers: a report of four cases. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1995;40(12):845-9.
25. Harbison L, Bell L. Anaphylactoid syndrome after intrauterine pressure catheter placement. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2010;115(2 Pt 2):407-8.
26. Harbord RM, Egger M, Sterne JA. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Statistics in Medicine 2006;25(20):3443-57.
27. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
28. Howarth GR, Botha DJ. Amniotomy plus intravenous oxytocin for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003250]
29. Land H, Grez M, Ruppert S, Schmale H, Rehbein M, Richter D, et al. Deduced amino acid sequence from the bovine oxytocin-neurophysin I precursor cDNA. Nature 1983;302:342-4.
30. Lind BK. The frequency of extramembranous placement of intrauterine pressure catheters. Primary Care Update for Ob/Gyns 1998;5(4):185.
31. Lind BK. Complications caused by extramembranous placement of intrauterine pressure catheters. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1999;180(4):1034-5.
32. MacKenzie IZ. Induction of labour at the start of the new millennium. Reproduction 2006;131(6):989-98.
33. Matsuo K, Lynch MA, Kopelman JN, Atlas RO. Anaphylactoid syndrome of pregnancy immediately after intrauterine pressure catheter placement. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2008;198(2):e8-e9.
34. Osterman MJ, Martin JA, Mathews TJ, Hamilton BE. Expanded data from the new birth certificate. National Vital Statistics Reports 2011;59(7):1-28. [PUBMED: 21848043]
35. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.1. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
36. Rodriquez MH, Masaki DI, Phelan JP, Diaz FG. Uterine rupture: are intrauterine pressure catheters useful in the diagnosis?. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1989;161:666-9.
37. Smith JG, Merrill DC. Oxytocin for induction of labor. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2006;49(3):594-608.
38. Soper DE, Mayhall CG, Dalton HP. Risk factors for intraamniotic infection: a prospective epidemiologic study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1989;161(3):562-6.
39. Soper DE, Mayhall CG, Froggatt JW. Characterization and control of intraamniotic infection in an urban teaching hospital. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1996;175(2):304-9.
40. Trudinger BJ, Pryse-Davies J. Fetal hazards of the intrauterine pressure catheter: five case reports. British Journal Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1978;85:573-4.
41. Van Halem K, Bakker JJH, Verhoeven CJ, Papatsonis DN, van Oudgaarden ED, Janssen PF, et al. Does use of an intrauterine catheter during labour increase risk of infection?. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2011 June 7 [Epub ahead of print].
42. Wilmink FA, Wilms FF, Heydanus R, Mol BW, Papatsonis DN. Fetal complications after placement of an intrauterine pressure catheter: a report of two cases and review of the literature. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2008;21(12):880-3.
43. Bakker JJH, Janssen PF, Van Halem K, van der Goes BY, Papatsonis DN, van der Post JAM, Mol BWJ. Internal versus external tocodynamometry during induced or augmented labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006947.pub2]