Understanding regional differences in farm policy preferences

American Journal of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 94, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 528-534

  Barnett, Barry J ^a   Coble, Keith H ^a  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLYCINE MAX; GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM; TRITICUM AESTIVUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84893350716     PISSN: 00029092     EISSN: 14678276     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aar061     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. Anderson, J. D., A. Harri, and K. H. Coble. 2009. Techniques for Multivariate Simulation from Mixed Marginal Distributions with Application toWhole Farm Revenue Simulation. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 34: 53-67.
2. Coble, K. H. and B. J. Barnett. The Impact of Alternative Farm Bill Designs on theAggregate Distribution of Farm Program Payments. Paper presented at the S-1016 conference on Domestic andTrade Impacts of U.S. Farm Policy: Future Directions and Challenges, Washington, DC, November 15-16, 2007.
3. Browne, W. P. 1995. Cultivating Congress: Constituents, Issues, and Interests in Agricultural Policymaking. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
4. Coble, K. H. and B. J. Barnett. 2008. An Assessment of Risk Exposure in Agriculture: A Literature Review. TAD/CA/APM/WP(2008)23. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, December 16.
5. Dismukes, R., C. Arriola, and K. H. Coble. 2010. ACRE Program Payments and Risk Reduction: An Analysis Based on Simulations of Crop Revenue Variability. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service Report 101, September, USDA.