Three-dimensional preoperative design of distraction osteogenesis for hemifacial microsomia

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 184-188

  Chen, Ying ^a   Niu, Feng ^a   Yu, Bing ^a   Liu, Jianfeng ^a   Wang, Meng ^a   Gui, Lai ^a  

^a PLASTIC SURGERY HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

CT data; Distraction osteogenesis; hemifacial microsomia; three dimensional model; treatment planning

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; FEMALE; GOLDENHAR SYNDROME; HUMAN; MALE; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; FEMALE; GOLDENHAR SYNDROME; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION; SOFTWARE DESIGN; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84893345560     PISSN: 10492275     EISSN: 15363732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000391     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Gorlin RJ, Pindborg JJ. Syndromes of the Head and Neck. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964:641-646
2. McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, et al. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;89:1-9
3. Diner PA, Kollar EM, Martinez H, et al. Intraoral distraction for mandibular lengthening: a technical innovation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1996;24:92-95
4. Polley JW, Figueroa AA. Distraction osteogenesis: its application in severe mandibular deformities in hemifacial microsomia. J Craniofac Surg 1997;8:422-430
5. Costantino PD, Buchbinder D. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: types, applications, and indications. J Craniofac Surg 1996;7:404-407
6. Scolozzi P, Link DW 2nd, Schendel SA. Computer simulation of curvilinear mandibular distraction: accuracy and predictability. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:1975-1980
7. Vannier MW, Marsh JL, Warren JO. Three-dimensional CT reconstruction images for craniofacial surgical planning and evaluation. Radiology 1984;150:179-184
8. Gateno J, Teichgraeber JF, Aguilar E. Computer planning for distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105:873-882
9. Troulis MJ, Everett P, Seldin EB. Development of a three-dimensional treatment planning system based on computed tomographic data. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;31:349-357
10. Meehan M, Maurer CR Jr, Rohlfing T, et al. Virtual 3D planning and guidance of mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Int Congress Ser 2003;1256:382-388
11. d'Hauthuille C, Taha F, Devauchelle B, et al. Comparison of two computer-assisted surgery techniques to guide a mandibular distraction osteogenesis procedure. Technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;34:197-201
12. Yeshwant K, Seldin EB, Gateno J, et al. Analysis of skeletal movements in mandibular distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:335-340
13. Paeng JY, Lee JH, Lee JH, et al. Condyle as the point of rotation for 3-D planning of distraction osteogenesis for hemifacial microsomia. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2007;35:91-102
14. Karp NS, Thorne CH, McCarthy JG. Bone lengthening in the craniofacial skeleton. Ann Plast Surg 1990;24:231-237
15. Katsumata A, Fujishita M, Maeda M, et al. 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99:212-220