Attention to detail: Why considering task demands is essential for single-trial analysis of BOLD correlates of the visual P1 and N1

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 529-542

  Warbrick, Tracy ^a   Arrubla, Jorge ^a   Boers, Franks ^a   Neuner, Irene ^a,b,c   Jon Shah, N ^a,b,c  

^a FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

^b RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c JARA BRAIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BOLD SIGNAL; BRAIN REGION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; OXYGEN; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84893344912     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00490     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Allen, P. J., Josephs, O., & Turner, R. (2000). A method for removing imaging artifact from continuous EEG recorded during functional MRI. Neuroimage, 12, 230-239.
2. Bagshaw, A. P., & Warbrick, T. (2007). Single trial variability of EEG and fMRI responses to visual stimuli. Neuroimage, 38, 280-292.
3. Biessmann, F., Plis, S., Meinecke, F. C., Eichele, T., & Muller, K. R. (2011). Analysis of multimodal neuroimaging data. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 4, 26-58.
4. Corbetta, M., Kincade, J. M., Ollinger, J. M., McAvoy, M. P., & Shulman, G. L. (2000). Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 292-297.
5. Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201-215.
6. Debener, S., Ullsperger, M., Siegel, M., Fiehler, K., von Cramon, D. Y., & Engel, A. K. (2005). Trial-by-trial coupling of concurrent electroencephalogram and functional magnetic resonance imaging identifies the dynamics of performance monitoring. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 11730-11737.
7. Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9-21.
8. Di Russo, F., Martinez, A., Sereno, M. I., Pitzalis, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (2002). Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Human Brain Mapping, 15, 95-111.
9. Eichele, T., Specht, K., Moosmann, M., Jongsma, M. L., Quiroga, R. Q., Nordby, H., et al. (2005). Assessing the spatiotemporal evolution of neuronal activation with single-trial event-related potentials and functional MRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 102, 17798-17803.
10. Fell, J. (2007). Cognitive neurophysiology: Beyond averaging. Neuroimage, 37, 1069-1072.
11. Forman, S. D., Cohen, J. D., Fitzgerald, M., Eddy, W. F., Mintun, M. A., & Noll, D. C. (1995). Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic-resonance-imaging (fMRI)-Use of a cluster-size threshold. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 33, 636-647.
12. Friston, K. J., Worsley, K. J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., Mazziotta, J. C., & Evans, A. C. (1993). Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent. Human Brain Mapping, 1, 210-220.
13. Fuglø, D., Pedersen, H., Rostrup, E., Hansen, A. E., & Larsson, H. B. (2012). Correlation between single-trial visual evoked potentials and the blood oxygenation level dependent response in simultaneously recorded electroencephalography-functional magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 68, 252-260.
14. Goldman, R. I., Wei, C. Y., Philiastides, M. G., Gerson, A. D., Friedman, D., Brown, T. R., et al. (2009). Single-trial discrimination for integrating simultaneous EEG and fMRI: Identifying cortical areas contributing to trial-to-trial variability in the auditory oddball task. Neuroimage, 47, 136-147.
15. Heeger, D. J., & Ress, D. (2002). What does fMRI tell us about neuronal activity? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 142-151.
16. Heekeren, H. R., Marrett, S., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2008). The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 467-479.
17. Herrmann, C. S., & Knight, R. T. (2001). Mechanisms of human attention: Event-related potentials and oscillations. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 465-476.
18. Hou, Y., & Liu, T. (2012). Neural correlates of object-based attentional selection in human cortex. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2916-2925.
19. Huettel, S. A., & McCarthy, G. (2004). What is odd in the oddball task? Prefrontal cortex is activated by dynamic changes in response strategy. Neuropsychologia, 42, 379-386.
20. Huster, R. J., Debener, S., Eichele, T., & Herrmann, C. S. (2012). Methods for simultaneous EEG-fMRI: An introductory review. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 6053-6060.
21. Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M., & Smith, S. (2002). Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage, 17, 825-841.
22. Jenkinson, M., & Smith, S. (2001). A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Medical Image Analysis, 5, 143-156.
23. Karch, S., Feuerecker, R., Leicht, G., Meindl, T., Hantschk, I., Kirsch, V., et al. (2010). Separating distinct aspects of the voluntary selection between response alternatives: N2-and P3-related BOLD responses. Neuroimage, 51, 356-364.
24. Lauritzen, M., & Gold, L. (2003). Brain function and neurophysiological correlates of signals used in functional neuroimaging. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 3972-3980.
25. Liu, T., Hospadaruk, L., Zhu, D. C., & Gardner, J. L. (2011). Feature-specific attentional priority signals in human cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 4484-4495.
26. Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Oeltermann, A. (2001). Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature, 412, 150-157.
27. Luck, S. J., Woodman, G. F., & Vogel, E. K. (2000). Event-related potential studies of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 432-440.
28. Musall, S., von Pfostl, V., Rauch, A., Logothetis, N. K., & Whittingstall, K. (2012). Effects of neural synchrony on surface EEG. Cerebral Cortex. doi:101093/cercor/bhs389.
29. Niazy, R. K., Beckmann, C. F., Iannetti, G. D., Brady, J. M., & Smith, S. M. (2005). Removal of fMRI environment artifacts from EEG data using optimal basis sets. Neuroimage, 28, 720-737.
30. Nolan, H., Whelan, R., & Reilly, R. B. (2010). FASTER: Fully automated statistical thresholding for EEG artifact rejection. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 192, 152-162.
31. Novitskiy, N., Ramautar, J. R., Vanderperren, K., De Vos, M., Mennes, M., Mijovic, B., et al. (2011). The BOLD correlates of the visual P1 and N1 in single-trial analysis of simultaneous EEG-fMRI recordings during a spatial detection task. Neuroimage, 54, 824-835.
32. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
33. Oostenveld, R., & Praamstra, P. (2001). The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 713-719.
34. Rorden, C., Karnath, H. O., & Bonilha, L. (2007). Improving lesion-symptom mapping. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1081-1088.
35. Smith, S. M. (2002). Fast robust automated brain extraction. Human Brain Mapping, 17, 143-155.
36. Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (2000). The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology, 37, 190-203.
37. Warbrick, T., Mobascher, A., Brinkmeyer, J., Musso, F., Richter, N., Stoecker, T., et al. (2009). Single-trial P3 amplitude and latency informed event-related fMRI models yield different BOLD response patterns to a target detection task. Neuroimage, 47, 1532-1544.
38. Warbrick, T., Reske, M., & Shah, J. (2013). Do EEG paradigms work in fMRI? Varying task demands in the visual oddball paradigm: Implications for task design and results interpretation. Neuroimage, 77, 177-185.
39. Weissman, D. H., Roberts, K. C., Visscher, K. M., & Woldorff, M. G. (2006). The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 971-978.
40. Woolrich, M. W., Ripley, B. D., Brady, M., & Smith, S. M. (2001). Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of fMRI data. Neuroimage, 14, 1370-1386.
41. Worsley, K. J., Evans, A. C., Marrett, S., & Neelin, P. (1992). A three-dimensional statistical analysis for CBF activation studies in human brain. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 12, 900-918.