Organizational factors influencing health information technology adoption in long-term-care facilities

Health Care Manager

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 30-37

  Wang, Tiankai ^a   Wang, Yangmei ^b   Moczygemba, Jackie ^a  

^a TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MIDWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Health information technology; HIT index; Long term care; Organizational factors

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; CLINICAL TRIAL; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MULTICENTER STUDY; ORGANIZATION; UNITED STATES;

ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; HUMANS; LONG-TERM CARE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; TEXAS;

EID: 84893265630     PISSN: 15255794     EISSN: 1550512X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.HCM.0000440624.85255.8e     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Institute of Medicine. Improving the Quality of Longterm Care. 2001. http://www.iom.edu/-/media/Files/Report%20Files/2003/Improving-the-Quality-of- Long-Term- Care/LTC8pagerFINAL.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2013.
2. Knickman JR, Snell EK. The 2030 problem: caring for aging baby boomers. Health Serv Res. 2002;34:849-884.
3. General Accounting Office. HHS's Efforts to Promote Health Information Technology in Long-term Care (Final Report). Baltimore, MD: Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services; 2004.
4. Hamilton BA. Evaluation Design of the Business Case of Health Information Technology in Long-term Care (Final Report). Baltimore, MD: Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services; 2006.
5. Walker J, Carayon P, Leveson N, et al. EHR safety: the way forward to safe and effective systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:272-277.
6. Congressional Budget Office. Evidence on the Costs and Benefits of Health Information Technology. 2008. http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/ ftpdocs/91xx/doc9168/05-20-healthit.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2013.
7. WinterGreen Research, Inc. Nursing Home and Long-term Care Information Systems: Market Opportunities, Strategies, and Forecasts, 2006 to 2012. 2006. http://www.giiresearch.com/report/wg37692-care.html. Accessed July 15, 2013.
8. Pillemer K, Meador RH, Teresi JA, et al. Effects of electronic health information technology implementation on nursing home resident outcomes. J Aging Health. 2011;24:92-112.
9. Menachemi N, Burke B, Brooks R. Adoption factors associatedwith patient safety-related information technology. J Healthc Qual. 2004;26:39-44.
10. Kaushal R, BatesDW, Poon EG, Jha AK, BluementhalD, and the Harvard Interfaculty Program for Health Systems Improvement NHINWorking Group. Functional gaps in attaining a national health information network. What will it take to get there in five years? Health Aff. 2005;24:1281-1289.
11. Poon EG, Jha AK, Christino M, et al. Assessing the level of healthcare information technology adoption in the United States: a snapshot. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006;6:1.
12. Brandeis G, Hogan M, Murphy M, Murray S. Nursing effort and quality of care for nursing home residents. Gerontologist. 2007;47:672-682.
13. LiuD, CastleNG, Diesel J. Health information technology in nursing homes. J Appl Gerontol. 2009;28:38-58.
14. Ward M, Jaana M, Bahensky J, Vartak S, Wakefield D. Clinical information system availability and use in urban and rural hospitals. J Med Syst. 2006;30:429-438.
15. Hudak S, Sharkey S. Health Information Technology: Are Long Term Care Providers Ready? 2007. http://www.chcf.org/-/media/MEDIA%20LIBRARY%20Files/PDF/ H/PDF%20HITNursingHomeReadiness.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2013.
16. Stratis Health. Minnesota Nursing Home Health Information Technology Survey Results. 2008. http://www .stratishealth.org/documents/HIT- LTCSurveyResults.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2013.
17. Resnick HE, Manard BB, Stone RI, et al. Used of electronic information systems in nursing homes: United States, 2004. J AmMed Inform Assoc. 2009;16:179-186.
18. Kimberly J, Evanisko M. Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovation. Acad Manage J. 1981; 24:689-713.
19. Damanpour F. The adoption of technological, administrative, and ancillary innovations: impact of organizational factors. J Manag. 1987;13:675-688.
20. Burke D, Wang B, Wan T, Diana M. Exploring hospitals' adoption of information technology. J Med Syst. 2002;26:349-355.
21. Dewar R, Dutton J. The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: an empirical analysis. Manag Sci. 1986;32:1422-1433.
22. Wang B, Wan T, Burke D, Bazzoli G, Lin B. Factors influencing health information system adoption in American hospitals. Health Care Manag Rev. 2005;30:44-51.
23. Li P, Bahensky J, JaanaM, WardM. Role ofmultihospital system membership in electronic medical record adoption. Health Care Manage Rev. 2008;33:169-177.
24. HikmetN, Bhattacherjee A, Menachemi N, Kayhan V, Brooks R. The role of organizational factors in the adoption of healthcare information technology in Florida hospitals. Health Care Manage Sci. 2008;11:1-9.
25. Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. New York: Free Press; 1995.
26. Carey K. Hospital cost efficiency and system membership. Inquiry. 2003;40:25-38.
27. Robinson J. Bond-market skeptism and stock-market exuberance in the hospital industry. Health Aff. 2002; 21:104-117.
28. Corder K. Acquiring new technology: comparing non-profit and public sector agencies. Admin Soc. 2001;33:194-219.
29. Scott J. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2002.
30. Harrison MI, Koppel R, Bar-Lev S. Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care-an interactive sociotechnical analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14:542-549.
31. Lourde K. Long-term care health information technology: providers are increasingly looking to improve quality and claim earned reimbursement with HIT. Provider. 2009;35:21-32.