RELcat: A relation registry for isocat data categories

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 3661-3664

  Windhouwer, Menzo ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Linguistic data categories; Ontological relationships; Relation registry

Indexed keywords

LINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS; TAXONOMIES;

DATA CATEGORIES; INITIAL DESIGN; LINGUISTIC DATA; ONTOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS; RELATION REGISTRY; SEMANTIC NETWORK;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 84893242831     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Allemang, D. And J. Handler (2008). Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist: Effective Modeling in RDFS and OWL, Morgan Kaufmann.
2. Aristar-Dry, H., S. Drude, J. Gippert, I. Nevskaya and M. Windhouwer (2012). "Rendering Endangered Lexicons Interoperable through Standards Harmonization": the RELISH Project. Language Resources and Evaluation. Istanbul, ELRA.
3. Broeder, D., D. v. Uytvanck, M. Windhouwer, M. Gavrilidou and T. Trippel (2012). Standardizing a Component Metadata Infrastructure. Language Resources and Evaluation. Istanbul, ELRA.
4. Farrar, S. And D. T. Langendoen (2010). An OWL-DL implementation of GOLD: An ontology for the Semantic Web. Linguistic Modeling of Information and Markup Languages: Contributions to Language Technology. A. W. Witt and D. Metzing. Dordrecht, Springer.
5. Ide, N. And L. Romary (2004). A Registry of Standard Data Categories for Linguistic Annotation. Language Resources and Evaluation. Lisbon, Portugal.
6. ISO 12620 (2009). Terminology and other language and content resources-Specification of data categories and management of a Data Category Registry for language resources, International Organization for Standardization.
7. Kemps-Snijders, M., M. Windhouwer, P. Wittenburg and S. E. Wright (2008). A Revised Data Model for the ISO Data Category Registry. Terminology and Knowledge Engineering B. N. Madsen and H. E. Thomsen. Copenhagen, Denmark.
8. ontotext. (2011). owl-sameAs-optimization. from http://www. ontotext. com/owlim/owl-sameas-optimisation.
9. Oracle. (2005). Oracle Database Semantic Technologies Developer's Guide. 2011, from http://download. oracle. com/docs/cd/E14072-01/appdev. 112/e11828/toc. htm.
10. Patejuk, A. And A. Przepiórkowski (2010). ISOcat Definition of the National Corpus of Polish Tagset. Language Resource and Language Technology Standards workshop at LREC 2010, Malta.
11. Schuurman, I. And M. Windhouwer (2011). Explicit Semantics for Enriched Documents. What Do ISOcat, RELcat and SCHEMAcat Have To Offer? 2nd Supporting Digital Humanities conference. Copenhagen, Denmark.
12. W3C. (2009). OWL Web Ontology Language. from http://www. w3. org/standards/techs/owl.
13. W3C (2009). SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System.
14. Windhouwer, M. And S. E. Wright (2012). Linking to linguistic data categories in ISOcat. Linked Data in Linguistics-Representing and Connecting Language Data and Language Metadata. C. Chiarcos, S. Nordhoff and S. Hellmann, Springer-Verlag: 99-107.