Cascading peer review for open-access publishing

European Science Editing

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 90-91

  Barroga, Edward F ^a  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cascading peer review; Learned society; Open access; Science editing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893207514     PISSN: 02583127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Ahmed SH, Gasparyan AY. Criticism of peer review and ways to improve it. European Science Editing 2013;39(1):8-10.
2. Gasparyan AY, Kitas GD. Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals. Croatian Medical Journal 2012;53:386-389. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.386.
3. Barroga EF, Kojima T. Research study designs: an appraisal for peer reviewers and science editors. European Science Editing 2013;39(2):44-45.
4. Kahn D. Open access for European science journals. European Science Editing 2012;38(4):91-93.
5. Kiselev AR. Development of open access medical journals in Russia: encountered problems and the example of the Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research. European Science Editing 2012;38(4):93-94.
6. The pros and cons of open access. Available at: http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/34.html (accessed 8 August 2013).
7. Beall J. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature 2012;489:179. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.386.
8. Davis P. Cascading peer-review - the future of open access? Available at: http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2010/10/12/cascading-peer-review-future-of-open-access/ (accessed 8 August 2013).
9. Davis P. Can open access journals guarantee sound methods? Available at: http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2010/10/19/oa-sound-methodology/ (accessed 8 August 2013).
10. Davis P. Should open access journals charge submission fees? Available at: http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2010/12/09/open-access-submission-fees/ (accessed 8 August 2013).