-
1
-
-
84876583405
-
Criticism of peer review and ways to improve it
-
Ahmed SH, Gasparyan AY. Criticism of peer review and ways to improve it. European Science Editing 2013;39(1):8-10.
-
(2013)
European Science Editing
, vol.39
, Issue.1
, pp. 8-10
-
-
Ahmed, S.H.1
Gasparyan, A.Y.2
-
2
-
-
84866435595
-
Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals
-
doi: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.386
-
Gasparyan AY, Kitas GD. Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals. Croatian Medical Journal 2012;53:386-389. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.386.
-
(2012)
Croatian Medical Journal
, vol.53
, pp. 386-389
-
-
Gasparyan, A.Y.1
Kitas, G.D.2
-
3
-
-
84880060939
-
Research study designs: An appraisal for peer reviewers and science editors
-
Barroga EF, Kojima T. Research study designs: an appraisal for peer reviewers and science editors. European Science Editing 2013;39(2):44-45.
-
(2013)
European Science Editing
, vol.39
, Issue.2
, pp. 44-45
-
-
Barroga, E.F.1
Kojima, T.2
-
4
-
-
84872142449
-
Open access for European science journals
-
Kahn D. Open access for European science journals. European Science Editing 2012;38(4):91-93.
-
(2012)
European Science Editing
, vol.38
, Issue.4
, pp. 91-93
-
-
Kahn, D.1
-
5
-
-
84872169569
-
Development of open access medical journals in Russia: Encountered problems and the example of the Saratov
-
Kiselev AR. Development of open access medical journals in Russia: encountered problems and the example of the Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research. European Science Editing 2012;38(4):93-94.
-
(2012)
Journal of Medical Scientific Research. European Science Editing
, vol.38
, Issue.4
, pp. 93-94
-
-
Kiselev, A.R.1
-
6
-
-
84893174943
-
-
The pros and cons of open access. Available at, accessed 8 August 2013
-
The pros and cons of open access. Available at: http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/34.html (accessed 8 August 2013).
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
84866179155
-
Predatory publishers are corrupting open access
-
doi: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.386
-
Beall J. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature 2012;489:179. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.386.
-
(2012)
Nature
, vol.489
, pp. 179
-
-
Beall, J.1
-
8
-
-
84893191932
-
-
Available at, accessed 8 August 2013
-
Davis P. Cascading peer-review - the future of open access? Available at: http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2010/10/12/cascading-peer-review-future-of-open-access/ (accessed 8 August 2013).
-
Cascading Peer-review - the Future of Open Access?
-
-
Davis, P.1
|