Disgusted, Embarrassed, Annoyed: Affective Associations Relate to Uptake of Colonoscopy Screening

Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 112-119

  Kiviniemi, Marc T ^a   Jandorf, Lina ^b   Erwin, Deborah O ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Affective associations; Colonoscopy; Health decision making

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893190663     PISSN: 08836612     EISSN: 15324796     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12160-013-9580-9     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2009. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2009.
2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008; 58: 71-96.
3. Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2002; 137: 132-141.
4. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Sondergaard O. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet. 1996; 348: 1467-1471.
5. Mandel JS, Church TR, Ederer F, Bond JH. Colorectal cancer mortality: effectiveness of biennial screening for fecal occult blood. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999; 91: 434-437.
6. Muller AD, Sonnenberg A. Protection by endoscopy against death from colorectal cancer. A case–control study among veterans. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1995; 155: 1741-1748.
7. Newcomb PA, Norfleet RG, Storer BE, Surawicz TS, Marcus PM. Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1992; 84: 1572-1575.
8. Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff GS, Sauar J, et al. Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer.Telemark Polyp Study I. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 1999; 34: 414-420.
9. Walsh JME, Terdiman JP. Colorectal cancer screening: scientific review. JAMA. 2003; 289: 1288-1296.
10. Meissner HI, Breen N, Klabunde CN, Vernon SW. Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention. 2006; 15: 389-394.
11. Nadel MR, Blackman DK, Shapiro JA, Seeff LC. Are people being screened for colorectal cancer as recommended? Results from the National Health Interview Survey. Preventive Medicine. 2002; 35: 199-206.
12. Shapiro JA, Seeff LC, Thompson TD, et al. Colorectal cancer test use from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008; 17: 1623-1630.
13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Increased use of colorectal cancer tests--United States, 2002 and 2004. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2006; 55: 308-311.
14. Subramanian S, Klosterman M, Amonkar MM, Hunt TL. Adherence with colorectal cancer screening guidelines: a review. Preventive Medicine. 2004; 38: 536-550.
15. Vernon SW. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997; 89: 1406-1422.
16. Kiviniemi MT, Bennett A, Zaiter M, Marshall JR. Decision Making For Colorectal Cancer Screening: What Do We Know about Theoretical Models of Decision Making? Psycho-Oncology. 2011; 20: 1023-1033.
17. Kiviniemi MT, Hay JL, James AS, et al. Decision Making About Cancer Screening: An Assessment of the State of the Science and a Suggested Research Agenda. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 2009; 18: 3133-3137.
18. Hay JL, Ford JS, Klein D, et al. Adherence to colorectal cancer screening in mammography-adherent older women. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2003; 26: 553-576.
19. James AS, Campbell MK, Hudson MA. Perceived barriers and benefits to colon cancer screening among African Americans in North Carolina: how does perception relate to screening behavior? Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention. 2002; 11: 529-534.
20. Janz NK, Wren PA, Schottenfeld D, Guire KE. Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and behavior: A population-based study. Preventive Medicine. 2003; 37: 627-634.
21. Menon U, Champion VL, Larkin GN, et al. Beliefs associated with fecal occult blood test and colonoscopy use at a worksite colon cancer screening program. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2003; 45: 891-898.
22. Zheng Y-F, Saito T, Takahashi M, Ishibashi T, Kai I. Factors associated with intentions to adhere to colorectal cancer screening follow-up exams. BMC Public Health. 2006; 6: 272.
23. Armitage CJ, Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology. 2001; 40: 471-499.
24. Harrison JA, Mullen PD, Green LW. A meta-analysis of studies of the health belief model with adults. Health Education Research. 1992; 7: 107-116.
25. Sheeran P, Taylor S. Predicting intentions to use condoms: A meta-analysis and comparison of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1999; 29: 1624-1675.
26. Kiviniemi MT, Voss-Humke AM, Seifert AL. How Do I Feel About the Behavior? The Interplay of Affective Associations With Behaviors and Cognitive Beliefs as Influences on Physical Activity Behavior. Health Psychology. 2007; 26: 152-158.
27. Kiviniemi MT, Duangdao KM. Affective associations mediate the influence of cost-benefit beliefs on fruit and vegetable consumption. Appetite. 2009; 52: 771-775.
28. Walsh EM, Kiviniemi MT: Changing How I Feel About the Food: Experimentally Manipulated Affective Associations With Fruits Change Fruit Choice Behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s10865-012-9490-5
29. Codori AM, Petersen GM, Miglioretti DL, Boyd P. Health beliefs and endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer: potential for cancer prevention. Preventive Medicine. 2001; 33: 128-136.
30. Janz NK, Lakhani I, Vijan S, et al. Determinants of colorectal cancer screening use, attempts, and non-use. Preventive Medicine. 2007; 44: 452-458.
31. Denberg TD, Melhado TV, Coombes JM, et al. Predictors of nonadherence to screening colonoscopy. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2005; 20: 989-995.
32. Chapple A, Ziebland S, Hewitson P, McPherson A. What affects the uptake of screening for bowel cancer using a faecal occult blood test (FOBt): a qualitative study. Social Science and Medicine. 2008; 66: 2425-2435.
33. Shapiro JA, Klabunde CN, Thompson TD, et al. Patterns of Colorectal Cancer Test Use, Including CT Colonography, in the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers and prevention: a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. 2012; 21: 895-904.
34. Klabunde CN, Lanier D, Nadel MR, et al. Colorectal Cancer Screening by Primary Care Physicians: Recommendations and Practices, 2006–2007. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2009; 37: 8-16.
35. Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Knudsen AB, et al. Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008; 149: 659-669.
36. Crites SL, Fabrigar LR, Petty RE. Measuring the affective and cognitive properties of attitudes: Conceptual and methodological issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1994; 20: 619-634.
37. Rawl SM, Champion V, Menon U, et al. Validation of scales to measure benefits of and barriers to colorectal cancer screening. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology. 2001; 19: 47-63.
38. Hayes A: PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf, 2012.
39. Korn EL, Graubard BI. Analysis of Health Surveys. New York: Wiley Interscience; 1999.
40. Powe BD, Faulkenberry R, Harmond L. A review of intervention studies that seek to increase colorectal cancer screening among african-americans. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2010; 25: 92-99.
41. Rawl SM, Menon U, Burness A, Breslau ES. Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening: An integrative review. Nursing Outlook. 2012; 60: 172-181. e113.
42. Ferrer RA, Fisher JD, Buck R, Amico KR. Pilot test of an emotional education intervention component for sexual risk reduction. Health Psychology. 2011; 30: 656-660.
43. Kiviniemi MT, Saad-Harfouche FG, Ciupak GL, et al.: Pilot Intervention Outcomes of an Educational Program for Biospecimen Research Participation. Journal of Cancer Education. 2012, 28(1):52–59
44. Sirriyeh R, Lawton R, Ward J. Physical activity and adolescents: An exploratory randomized controlled trial investigating the influence of affective and instrumental text messages. British Journal of Health Psychology. 2010; 15: 825-840.
45. Partin MR, Grill J, Noorbaloochi S, et al. Validation of self-reported colorectal cancer screening behavior from a mixed-mode survey of veterans. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008; 17: 768-776.
46. Kiviniemi MT, Orom H, Giovino GA. Psychological Distress and Smoking Behavior: The Nature of the Relation Differs By Race/Ethnicity. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2011; 13: 113-119.
47. Kiviniemi MT, Orom H, Giovino GA. Race/ethnicity, psychological distress, and fruit/vegetable consumption. The nature of the distress-behavior relation differs by race/ethnicity. Appetite. 2011; 56: 737-740.
48. Tsai JL, Knutson B, Fung HH. Cultural variation in affect valuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2006; 90: 288-307.
49. Tsai JL. Ideal affect: Cultural causes and behavioral consequences. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2007; 2: 242-259.
50. Swan J, Breen N, Graubard BI, et al. Data and trends in cancer screening in the United States: results from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer. 2010; 116: 4872-4881.
51. New York State Department of Health: Cancer Services Program - Community Programs List. Available at http://www.health.ny.gov/diseases/cancer/services/community_resources/. Access verified October 30, 2013.
52. Cancer Services Program of Western New York: Services. Available at http://www.cspwny.org/services.html, Access verified October 30, 2013.