The Swedish Research Council’s Definition of ‘Scientific Misconduct’: A Critique

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 115-126

  Salwén, Håkan ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Conditions of adequacy; Definition; Scientific misconduct; Swedish Research Council

Indexed keywords

CONFLICT; CONSENSUS; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LANGUAGE; ORGANIZATION; RESEARCH ETHICS; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SWEDEN;

ACADEMIES AND INSTITUTES; CONSENSUS; DISSENT AND DISPUTES; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LANGUAGE; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SWEDEN;

EID: 84893165931     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: 14715546     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-014-9523-2     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Boghossian, P. A., & Velleman, J. D. (1989). Colour as a secondary quality. Mind,98, 81–103.
2. Chalmers, A. F. (1999). What is this thing called science?. Buckingham: Open University Press.
3. Churchland, P. (1981). Eliminative materialism and propositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophy,78, 67–90.
4. Churchland, P. (1986). Neurophilosophy: Toward a unified science of the mind/brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Dorr, C., & Rosen, G. (2002). Composition as a fiction. In R. Gale (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to metaphysics (pp. 151–174). Oxford: Blackwell.
6. Fanelli, D. (2011). The black, the white and the grey areas: Towards an international and interdisciplinary definition of scientific misconduct. In T. Mayer & N. Stencke (Eds.), Promoting research integrity in a global environment (pp. 79–90). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
7. Field, H. (1980). Science without numbers: A defence of nominalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
8. Forsman, B. (2007). Begrepp om forskningsfusk. Rapport till Vetenskapsrådet.
9. Herndron, T., Ash, M., & Pollin, R. (2013). Does high public debt consistently stifle economic growth?. A Critique of Reinhart and Rogoff. Political Economy Research Institute. Amherst: University of Amherst.
10. Irons, J. & Bivens, J. (2010). Government Debt and Economic Growth. Economic Policy Institute, Briefing Paper # 271.
11. Joyce, R. (2001). The myth of morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Krugman, P. (2010). Reinhart and rogoff are confusing me. http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/11/reinhart-and-rogoff-are-confusing-me/?_r=0. Accessed November 6, 2013.
13. Krugman, P. (2013). Reinhart and Rogoff are not happy. http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/26/reinhart-and-rogoff-are-not-happy/. Accessed November 6, 2013.
14. Ladyman, J. (2002). Understanding philosophy of science. London: Routledge.
15. Mackie, J. (1977). Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
16. National Academy of Sciences. (2011). On being a scientist. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17. Newton-Smith, W. (1981). The rationality of science. London: Routledge.
18. Reinhart, C., & Rogoff, K. (2010). Growth in a time of debt. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings,100, 573–578.
19. Reinhart, C. & Rogoff, K (2013a). Responding to our critics. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/26/opinion/reinhart-and-rogoff-responding-to-our-critics.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0. Accessed November 6, 2013.
20. Reinhart, C. & Rogoff, K (2013b). Letter to Paul Krugman. http://www.carmenreinhart.com/letter-to-pk/. Accessed November 6, 2013.
21. Resnik, B. D. (2003). From Baltimore to Bell Labs: Reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct. Accountability in Research, 10, 123–135.
22. Resnik, B. D., & Stewart, S. N. (2012). Misconduct versus honest error and scientific disagreement. Accountability in Research,19, 56–63.
23. Salwén, H. (forthcoming 2014). Dålig moral eller dålig vetenskap eller varken det ena eller det andra? Historisk Tidskrift.
24. SRC (2011a). Good Research Practice. Vetenskapsrådets rapportserie 3, 2011.
25. SRC (2011b). God forskningssed. Vetenskapsrådets rapportserie 1, 2011.