Corridors and networks in landscape: Structure, functions and ecological effects

Chinese Geographical Science

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-4

  Shen, Zehao ^a   Wang, Yanglin ^a   Fu, Bojie ^b  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b RESEARCH CENTER FOR ECO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HABITAT CORRIDOR; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE;

EID: 84893145168     PISSN: 10020063     EISSN: 1993064X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11769-014-0668-3     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Abry P, Baraniuk R, Flandrin P et al., 2002. The multiscale nature of network traffic: Discovery, analysis, and modelling. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 19(3): 28-46. doi: 10.1109/79.998080
2. Beier P, Noss R F, 1998. Do habitat corridors provide connectivity? Conservation Biology, 12(6): 1241-1252. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.98036.x
3. Bélisle M, 2005. Measuring landscape connectivity: The challenge of behavioral landscape ecology. Ecology, 86(8): 1988-1995. doi: 10.1890/04-0923
4. Bennett A F, 2003. Linkages in the Landscape: The Role of Corridors and Connectivity in Wildlife Conservation. Switzerland and Cambridge, U.K.: IUCN.
5. Bunn A G, Urban D L, Keitt T H, 2000. Landscape connectivity: A conservation application of graph theory. Journal of Environmental Management, 59: 265-278.
6. Collinge S K, 1996. Ecological consequences of habitat fragmentation: Implications for landscape architecture and planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 36(1): 59-77. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00341-6
7. Cova T J, Goodchild M F, 2002. Extending geographical representation to include fields of spatial objects. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16(6): 509-532. doi: 10.1080/13658810210137040
8. Fall A, Fortin M J, Manseau M et al., 2007. Spatial graphs: Principles and applications for habitat connectivity. Ecosystems, 10(3): 448-461. doi: 10.1007/s10021-007-9038-7
9. Fletcher J R, Acevedo M A, Reichert B E et al., 2011. Social network models predict movement and connectivity in ecological landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(48): 19282-19287. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107549108
10. Foltête J C, Clauzel C, Vuide G, 2012. A software tool dedicated to the modeling of landscape networks. Environmental Modelling & Software, 38: 316-327. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.07.002
11. Forman R T T, Gordon M, 1986. Landscape Ecology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
12. Forman R T T, Sperling D, Bissonette J A et al., 2003. Road Ecology: Science and Solutions. Washington D.C.: Island Press.
13. Galpern P, Manseau M, Fall A, 2011. Patch-based graphs of landscape connectivity: A guide to construction, analysis and application for conservation. Biological Conservation, 144(1): 44-55. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon. 2010.09.002
14. Gascuel-Odoux C, Aurousseau P, Doray T et al., 2011. Incorporating landscape features to obtain an object-oriented landscape drainage network representing the connectivity of surface flow pathways over rural catchments. Hydrological Processes, 25(23): 3625-3636. doi: 10.1002/hyp.8089
15. Haddad N M, 1999. Corridor use predicted from behaviors at habitat boundaries. American Naturalist, 153(2): 215-227. doi: 10.1086/303163
16. Hanksi I, 1998. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature, 396(6706): 41-49. doi: 10.1038/23876
17. Hulme P E, 2009. Trade, transport and trouble: Managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46(1): 10-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01600.x
18. Keitt T H, Urban D L, Milne B T, 1997. Managing fragmented landscapes: A macroscopic Approach. Conservation Ecology, 1(1): 4.
19. Kindlmann P, Burel F, 2008. Connectivity measures: A review. Landscape Ecology, 23(8): 879-890. doi: 10.1007/s10980-008-9245-4
20. Kupfer J A, 2012. Landscape ecology and biogeography: Rethinking landscape metrics in a post-FRAGSTATS landscape. Progress in Physical Geography, 36(3): 400-420. doi: 10.1177/0309133312439594
21. Landguth E L, Hand B K, Glassy J et al., 2011. UNICOR: A species connectivity and corridor network simulator. Ecography, 34: 1-6.
22. McGarigal K, Cushman S A, Neel M C et al., 2002. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Available at: www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html.
23. McGarigal K, Marks B J, 1995. Fragstats: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying structure. PNW-GTR-351, Oregon.
24. McRae B H, Shah V B, 2011. Circuitscape User Guide. The University of California, Santa Barbara. Available at: http://www.circuitscape.org.
25. Miller C, Urban D L, 2000. Connectivity of forest fuels and surface fire regimes. Landscape Ecology, 15(2): 145-154. doi: 10.1023/A:1008181313360
26. Minor E S, Lookingbill T R, 2010. A multiscale network analysis of protected-area connectivity for mammals in the United States. Conservation Biology, 24(6): 1549-1558. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01558.x
27. Pascual-Hortal L, Saura S, 2006. Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: Towards the priorization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation. Landscape Ecology, 21(7): 959-967. doi: 10.1007/s10980-006-0013-z
28. Poole G C, 2002. Fluvial landscape ecology: Addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuum. Freshwater Biology, 47(4): 641-660. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00922.x
29. Rayfield B, Fortin M-J, Fall A, 2011. Connectivity for conservation: A framework to classify network measures. Ecology, 92(4): 847-858. doi: 10.1890/09-2190.1
30. Saura S, 2010. Measuring connectivity in habitat mosaics: The equivalence of two existing network indices and progress beyond them. Community Ecology, 11(2): 217-222. doi: 10.1556/ComEc.11.2010.2.10
31. Saura S, Estreguil C, Mouton C et al., 2011. Network analysis to assess landscape connectivity trends: Application to European forests (1990-2000). Ecological Indicators, 11(2): 407-416. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.06.011
32. Saura S, Torne J, 2009. Conefor Sensinode 2.2: A software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity. Environmental Modelling & Software, 24(1): 135-139. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.05.005
33. Theobald D M, Reed S E, Fields K et al., 2012. Connecting natural landscapes using a landscape permeability model to prioritize conservation activities in the United States. Conservation Letters, 5(2): 123-133. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00218.x
34. Tischendorf L, Fahrig L, 2000. On the use and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos, 90(1): 7-19. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900102.x
35. Turner M G, Gardner R, 1991. Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology: The Analysis and Interpretation of Landscape Heterogeneity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
36. Urban D, Keitt T, 2001. Landscape connectivity: A graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology, 82(5): 1205-1218. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1205: LCAGTP]2.0.CO;2
37. Zetterberg A, Mörtberg U M, Balfors B, 2010. Making graph theory operational for landscape ecological assessments, planning, and design. Landscape and Urban Planning, 95(4): 181-191. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010. 01.002