What 'misguided campaign' against single embryo transfer?

Human Reproduction

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 380-381

  Gleicher, N ^a   Kushnir, V A ^a   Barad, D H ^a  

^a Center for Human Reproduction New York   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERTIZING; ELECTION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; LETTER; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE; TWIN PREGNANCY;

FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, TWIN; SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER;

EID: 84893113994     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: 14602350     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det444     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. Andersen AN, Gianaroli L, Felberbaum R, de MJ, Nygren KG. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2002. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2006;21:1680-1697.
2. De Neubourg D, Bogaerts K, Wyns C, Albert A, Camus M, Candeur M, Degueldre M, Delbaere A, Delvigne A, De Sutter P. et al.: The history of Belgian assisted reproduction technology cycle registration and control: A case study in reducing the incidence of multiple pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2013;28:2709-2719.