Is there a difference in cognitive development between preschool singletons and twins born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection or in vitro fertilization?

Journal of Zhejiang University: Science B

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 51-57

  Xing, Lan Feng ^a   Qian, Yu Li ^a   Chen, Lu Ting ^a   Zhang, Fan Hong ^a   Xu, Xin Fen ^a   Qu, Fan ^a   Zhu, Yi Min ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Cognitive development; In vitro fertilization (IVF); Intelligence quotient (IQ); Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI); Singleton; Twins

Indexed keywords

ARITHMETIC; ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; CHILD; COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMPLOYMENT STATUS; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREGNANCY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TWINS; WECHSLER INTELLIGENCE SCALE;

CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COGNITION; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; INTELLIGENCE; INTELLIGENCE TESTS; MALE; SPERM INJECTIONS, INTRACYTOPLASMIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TWINS;

EID: 84893096674     PISSN: 16731581     EISSN: 18621783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B1300229     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Cederblad, M., Friberg, B., Ploman, F., et al., 1996. Intelligence and behaviour in children born after in-vitro fertilization treatment. Hum. Reprod., 11(9):2052-2057.
2. de Sutter, P., Gerris, J., Dhont, M., 2003a. A health-economic decision-analytic model comparing double with single embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI: a sensitivity analysis. Hum. Reprod., 18(6):1361. [doi:10.1093/humrep/ deg261]
3. de Sutter, P., van der Elst, J., Coetsier, T., et al., 2003b. Single embryo transfer and multiple pregnancy rate reduction in IVF/ICSI: a 5-year appraisal. Reprod. Biomed. Online, 6(4):464-469. [doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10) 62169-4]
4. Ericson, A., Nygren, K.G., Olausson, P.O., et al., 2002. Hospital care utilization of infants born after IVF. Hum. Reprod., 17(4):929-932. [doi:10.1093/humrep/17.4.929]
5. Gerris, J.M., 2005. Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal. Hum. Reprod. Update, 11(2): 105-121. [doi:10.1093/humupd/ dmh049]
6. Land, J.A., Evers, J.L., 2003. Risks and complications in assisted reproduction techniques: report of an ESHRE consensus meeting. Hum. Reprod., 18(2):455-457. [doi:10. 1093/humrep/deg081]
7. Leslie, G.I., Gibson, F.L., McMahon, C., et al., 2003. Children conceived using ICSI do not have an increased risk of delayed mental development at 5 years of age. Hum. Reprod., 18(10):2067-2072. [doi:10.1093/humrep/deg408]
8. Nyboe Andersen, A., Goossens, V., Bhattacharya, S., et al., 2009. Assisted reproductive technology and intrauterine inseminations in Europe, 2005: results generated from European registers by ESHRE: ESHRE. The European IVF Monitoring Programme (EIM), for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Hum. Reprod., 24(6):1267-1287. [doi:10.1093/humrep/dep035]
9. Pinborg, A., Loft, A., Schmidt, L., et al., 2003. Attitudes of IVF/ICSI-twin mothers towards twins and single embryo transfer. Hum. Reprod., 18(3):621-627. [doi:10.1093/humrep/deg145]
10. Place, I., Englert, Y., 2003. A prospective longitudinal study of the physical, psychomotor, and intellectual development of singleton children up to 5 years who were conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared with children conceived spontaneously and by in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril., 80(6):1388-1397. [doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.06.004]
11. Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, I., Bonduelle, M., Barnes, J., et al., 2005. International collaborative study of intracytoplasmic sperm injection-conceived, in vitro fertilization-conceived, and naturally conceived 5-year-old child outcomes: cognitive and motor assessments. Pediatrics, 115(3):e283-e289. [doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1445]
12. Roberts, S.A., McGowan, L., Mark Hirst, W., et al., 2011. Reducing the incidence of twins from IVF treatments: predictive modelling from a retrospective cohort. Hum. Reprod., 26(3):569-575. [doi:10.1093/humrep/deq352]
13. Stromberg, B., Dahlquist, G., Ericson, A., et al., 2002. Neurological sequelae in children born after in-vitro fertilisation: a population-based study. Lancet, 359(9305): 461-465. [doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07674-2]
14. The European IVF-Monitoring Programme (EIM), for the European Society of Human Reproduction (ESHRE), 2005. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2001. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum. Reprod., 20 (5):1158-1176. [doi:10.1093/humrep/deh755]
15. van Montfoort, A.P., Dumoulin, J.C., Land, J.A., et al., 2005. Elective single embryo transfer (ESET) policy in the first three IVF/ICSI treatment cycles. Hum. Reprod., 20 (2): 433-436. [doi:10.1093/humrep/deh619]
16. Veleva, Z., Karinen, P., Tomas, C., et al., 2009. Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI. Hum. Reprod., 24(7):1632-1639. [doi:10.1093/humrep/dep042]
17. Wolner-Hanssen, P., Rydhstroem, H., 1998. Cost-effectiveness analysis of in-vitro fertilization: estimated costs per successful pregnancy after transfer of one or two embryos. Hum. Reprod., 13(1):88-94. [doi:10.1093/humrep/13.1.88]