The impact of letter grades on student effort, course selection, and major choice: A regression-discontinuity analysis

Journal of Economic Education

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-10

  Main, Joyce B ^a   Ost, Ben ^b  

^a Purdue University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Course selection; Grades; Major choice; Regression discontinuity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893059840     PISSN: 00220485     EISSN: 21524068     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220485.2014.859953     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bar, T., V. Kadiyali, and A. Zussman. 2009. Grade information and grade inflation: The Cornell experiment.Journal of Economic Perspectives23(3): 93-108.
2. Betts, J. 1997. Do grading standards affect the incentive to learn? http://www.shsu.edu/?dpg006/gincentives2.pdf (accessed September 6, 2012).
3. Grant, D., and W. Green. 2013. Grades as incentives.Empirical Economics44(3): 1563-92.
4. Grove, W. A., and T. Wasserman. 2006. Incentives and student learning: A natural experiment with economics problem sets.Research on Teaching Innovations96(2): 447-52.
5. Jensen, E. J., and A. L. Owen. 2000. Why are women such reluctant economists? Evidence from liberal arts colleges. American Economic Review90: 466-70.
6. Oettinger, G. S. 2002. The effect of nonlinear incentives on performance: Evidence from "ECON 101."Review of Economics and Statistics84(3): 509-17.
7. Ost, B. 2010. The role of peers and grades in determining major persistence in the sciences.Economics of Education Review29(6): 923-34.
8. Owen, A. L. 2010. Grades, gender, and encouragement: A regression discontinuity analysis.Journal of Economic Education41: 217-34.
9. Paredes, V. 2012. Job market paper. Grading system and student effort. http://www.econ.uchile.cl/uploads/addon/archivo/ post/5930/ jobmarketpaperParedes.pdf (accessed September 6, 2012).
10. Rask, K. N. 2010. Attrition in STEM fields at a liberal arts college: The importance of grades and pre-collegiate preferences.Economics of Education Review29: 892-900.
11. Rask, K. N., and J. M. Tiefenthaler. 2008. The role of grade sensitivity in explaining the gender imbalance in undergraduate economics.Economics of Education Review27(6): 676-87.
12. Sabot, R., and J. Wakeman-Linn. 1991. Grade inflation and course choice.Journal of Economic Perspectives5(1): 159-70.
13. WebCASPAR. 2011. https://webcaspar.nsf.gov/OlapBuilder (accessed June 6, 2013).