Determinants of caesarean risk factor in Northern region of Bangladesh: A multivariate analysis

Iranian Journal of Public Health

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 16-27

  Rahman, Mostafizur ^a   Shariff, Asma Ahmad ^a   Shafie, Aziz ^a   Saaid, Rahmah ^a   Md Tahir, Rohayatimah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Caesarean delivery; Multiple logistic regression; Risk factors; Stepwise regression analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893051240     PISSN: 22516085     EISSN: 22516093     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Joseph PP, Ann MM, Loise JP, Marion S, Rosemary EP (1988). Medical dictionary: A concise and up-to-date guide to medical terms, Houghton Mifflin Company, USA.
2. Gomes UA, Silva AA, Bettiol H, Barbieri MA (1999). Risk factors for the increasing caesar-ean section rate in Southeast Brazil: a compari-son of two birth cohorts, 1978-1979 and 1994. Int J Epi, 28, 687-94.
3. Leung GM, Lam TH, Thach TQ, Wan S, Ho LM (2001). Rates of caesarean birth in Hong Kong: 1987-1999. Birth, 28: 166-72.
4. Leone T, Padmadas SS, Matthews Z (2008). Community factors affecting rising caesarean section rates in developing countries: an analy-sis of six countries. Soc Sci Med, 67: 1236-1246.
5. Belizán JM, Althabe F, Barros FC, Alexander S, Showalter E, Griffin A et al. (1999). Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study. Br Medi J, 319: 1397-02.
6. Murray SF (2000). Relation between private health insurance and high rates of caesarean section in Chile: qualitative and quantitative study. Br Med J, 321: 1501-05.
7. Martin JA, Park MM, Sutton PD. (2002). Births: preliminary data for 2001. National Vital Statisti-cal Report 50, 1-20.
8. Ravindran J (2008). Rising caesarean section rates in public hospitals in Malaysia 2006. Medi J Ma-laysia, 63(5): 434-35.
9. BMMS (2010). Bangladesh maternal mortality and health care survey 2010: summary of key find-ings and implications, Dhaka, Bangladesh 1-12.
10. Savage W (2000). The caesarean section epidemic. J Obstet Gynaecol, 20: 223-5.
11. World Health Organization (1985). Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet, 2: 436-37.
12. Parrish KM, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Connell FA, LoGerfo JP (1994). Effect of changes in ma-ternal age, parity, and birth weight distribution on primary caesarean delivery rates. J Am Medi Asso, 271: 443-47.
13. Ecker JL, Chen KT, Cohen AP, Riley LE, Lieberman ES (2001). Increased risk of caesar-ean delivery with advancing maternal age: indi-cations and associated factors in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynaecol, 185: 883-87.
14. Kun H, Fangbiao T, Brian F, Joanna R, Rachel T, Shenglan T et al. (2013). A mixed-method study of factors associated with differences in caesarean section rates at community level: the case of rural China. Midwifery, 29(8): 911-920.
15. Mossialos E, Allin S, Karras K, Davaki K (2005). An investigation of caesarean section in three greek hospitals: the impact of financial incen-tives and convenience. Eur J Public Health, 15: 288-95.
16. Onwude JL, Rao S, Selo-Ojeme DO (2005). Large babies and unplanned caesarean delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol, 118(1): 36-39.
17. Stanton CK, Holtz SA (2006). Levels and trends in caesarean birth in the developing world. Studies in Family Planning, 37(1): 41-48.
18. Skalkidis Y, Petridou E, Papathoma E, Revinthi K, Tong D, Trichopoulos D (1996). Are operative delivery procedures in Greece socially conditioned? Int J Qual Health Care, 8: 159-65.
19. Taffel SM (1994). Caesarean delivery in the United States, 1990. Vital Health Statistics 51, 1-24.
20. Tatar M, Gunalp S, Somunoglu S, Demirol A (2000). Women's perceptions of caesarean section: reflections from a Turkish teaching hospital. Soc Sci Med, 50: 1227-33.
21. Signorelli C, Cattaruzza MS, Osborn JF (1995). Risk factors for caesarean section in Italy: results of a multicentre study. Public Health, 109: 191-9.
22. Spaans WA, Sluijs MB, Van Roosmalen J, Bleker O (2002). Risk factors at caesarean section and failure of subsequent trial of labour. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol, 100: 163-6.
23. Lynch CM, Kearney R, Turner MJ (2002). Maternal morbidity after elective repeat caesarean section after two or more previous procedures. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol, 4320: 1-4.
24. Joshua LW, Fergal DM, Danielle E, Robert HB, David AN, Christine HC et al. (2004). Obesity, obstetric complications and caesarean delivery rate-a population-based screening study. Am J Obstet Gynaecol, 190(4): 1091-1097.
25. Mould TA, Chong S, Spencer JAD, Gallivan S (1996). Women's involvement with the decision preceding their caesarean section and their degree of involvement. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 103: 1074-7.
26. Wilkinson C, McIlwaine G, Boulton-Jones C, Cole S (1998). Is a rising caesarean section rate inevitable? Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 105: 45-52.
27. Druzin ML, El-Sayed YY (2006). Caesarean de-livery on maternal request: wise use of finite resources? a view from the trenches review ar-ticle. Seminars in Perinatology, 30(5): 305-308.
28. Shearer EL (1993). Caesarean section: medical benefits and costs. Soc Sci Med, 37: 1223-31.
29. Parkhurst JO, Rahman SA (2007). Life saving or money wasting? Perceptions of caesarean sec-tions among users of services in rural Bangla-desh. Health Policy, 80: 392-401.
30. Khawaja M, Kabakian-Khasholian T, Jurdi R (2004). Determinants of caesarean section in Egypt: evidence from the demographic and health survey. Health Policy, 69: 273-281.
31. Kassak KM, Mohammad AA, Abdallah AM (2009). Opting for a caesarean: what deter-mines the decision? Public Administration and Management, 13(3): 100-122.
32. Rahman M, Shariff AA, Saaid R, Shafie A (2012). Age at marriage, maternal age and caesarean delivery of first birth in the northern region of Bangladesh: a study on curve estimation. Man in India, 92(1): 93-113.
33. Cochran WG (1977). Sampling techniques. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons 72-76.
34. Khawaja M, Jurdi R, Kabakian T (2004). Rising trends in caesarean section rates in Egypt. Birth, 31(1): 12-16.
35. Sufang G, Padmadas SS, Fengmin Z, Brown JJ Stones RW (2007). Delivery settings and cae-sarean section rates in China. Bulletin of World Health Org, Geneva 85, 10.
36. Rahman M, Shariff AA, Shafie A (2012). Caesare-an Risk Factors in Northern Region of Bang-ladesh: A Statistical Analysis. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 11 (5): 823-833.
37. Abu-Heija AT, Jallad MF, Abukteish F (1999). Obstetrics and prenatal outcome for pregnan-cies after the age of 45. J Obstet Gynaecol, 19: 486-488.
38. Padmadas S, Kumar S, Nair, S, Kumari A (2000). Caesarean section delivery in Kerala, India: ev-idence from a national family health survey. Soc Sci Med, 51: 511-21.
39. Nassar N, Sullivan E (2001). Australia's Mothers and Babies, 1999, AIHW Cat. no. PER19, Perinatal Statistics Series no. 11, AIHW National Perinatal Statistics Unit, Sydney.
40. Webster L, Daling J, Mcfarlane C, Ashley, D, Warren C (1992). Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section in Jamaica. J Bio Sci, 24: 515-25.
41. Mishra US, Ramanathan M (2002). Delivery-related complications and determinants of cae-sarean section rates in India. Health Policy Plan-ning, 17: 90-8.
42. Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, Zavaleta N, Carroli G, Velazco A et al. (2006). Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and prenatal health in Latin America. The Lancet, 367(9525): 1819-1829.