Data management strategies for multinational large-scale systems biology projects

Briefings in Bioinformatics

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 65-78

  Wruck, Wasco ^a   Peuker, Martin ^a   Regenbrecht, Christian R A ^b  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b Charitè Univeritätsmedizin Berlin ^*

Author keywords

Data citation; Data management; Data sharing; Open access; Systems biology

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA BASE; DATA CITATION; DATA SHARING; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; OPEN ACCESS; STATISTICS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

DATA CITATION; DATA MANAGEMENT; DATA SHARING; OPEN ACCESS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATA COLLECTION; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNATIONALITY; SOFTWARE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 84893011962     PISSN: 14675463     EISSN: 14774054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbs064     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Committee on Issues in theTransborder Flow of Scientific Data, National Research Council: Bits of Power: Issues in Global Access to Scientific Data. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press, 1997.
2. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Principles and Guidelines forAccess to ResearchData from Public Funding.OECDPublications 2007.
3. WellcomeTrustwillPenalise ScientistsWhoDon'tEmbraceOpenAccess. TheGuardian 2012. http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/ jun/28/wellcome-trust-scientists-open-access (24 September 2012, date last accessed).
4. Lyon L. Dealing with data: roles, rights, responsibilities and relationships. Consultancy Report 2007;54.
5. Gattiker A, Hermida L, Liechti R, et al. MIMAS 3.0 is a multiomics information management and annotation system. BMC Bioinformatics 2009;10:151.
6. McAllister D, Collis A, McAllister D, Ball M. BBSRCData Sharing Policy. Nat Precedings 2011; doi:10.1038/npre. 2011.6015.1 (Advance Access publication 8 June 2011).
7. Field D, Sansone S-A, Collis A, et al. 'Omics data sharing. Science 2009;326:234-6.
8. Kuipers T, Hoeven JVD. Insight into digital preservation of research output in Europe. Survey Report FP7-2007- 223758 PARSE.Insight. http://www.parse-insight.eu/ downloads/PARSE-Insight_D3-4_SurveyReport_final_ hq.pdf, 2009 (2 May 2012, date last accessed).
9. Ruusalepp R. Infrastructure planning and data curation: a comparative study of international approaches to enabling the sharing of research data. JISC report, 2008. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/ preservation/national_data_sharing_report_final.pdf (24 September 2012, date last accessed).
10. 2011 Canadian Research Data Summit Final Report Released-Research Data Strategy. http://rds-sdr.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc. ca/eng/news/data_summit_report.html (2 May 2012, date last accessed).
11. Data Management Planning. http://ands.org.au/guides/datamanagement- planning-awareness.html (25 April 2012, date last accessed).
12. U.S. GAO-Climate Change Research: Agencies Have Data-Sharing Policies but Could Do More to Enhance the Availability of Data from Federally Funded Research. http:// www.gao.gov/products/GAO-07-1172 (26 April 2012, date last accessed).
13. Shublaq NW, Coveney PV. Merging genomic and phenomic data for research and clinical impact. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012;174:111-5.
14. International Council for Science. ICSU Report of the CSPR Assessment Panel on Scientific Data and Information. International Council for Science 2004; 26-7.
15. PMSEIC Working Group on Data for Science: FROM DATA TO WISDOM: Pathways to Successful Data Management for Australian Science, Report to PMSEIC, 2006.
16. Ball A. Review of the State of the Art of the Digital Curation of Research Data, 2010, 26. Project Report. Bath: University of Bath, (ERIM Project Document erim1rep091103ab11). http://opus.bath.ac.uk/18774/2/erim1rep091103ab11.pdf (24 September 2012, date last accessed).
17. Open Archives Initiative-Protocol forMetadata Harvesting-v.2.0. http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/openarchivesprotocol. html (10 May 2012, date last accessed).
18. Subramaniam S, Fahy E, Gupta S, et al. Bioinformatics and systems biology of the lipidome. Chem Rev 2011;111: 6452-90.
19. Beagrie N. Digital curation for science, digital libraries, and individuals. IntJ Digit Curation 2008;1:3-16.
20. Li C, Donizelli M, Rodriguez N, et al. BioModels Database: an enhanced, curated and annotated resource for published quantitative kinetic models. BMC Syst Biol 2010;4:92.
21. Clarke L, Zheng-Bradley X, Smith R, et al. The 1000 Genomes Project: data management and community access. NatMethods 2012;9:459-62.
22. Schadt EE, Linderman MD, Sorenson J, et al. Computational solutions to large-scale data management and analysis. Nat Rev Genet 2010;11:647-57.
23. ERASysBio j Home. http://www.erasysbio.net/ (3 May 2012, date last accessed).
24. SystemsX.ch - The Swiss Initiative in Systems Biology-What is SystemsX.ch? http://www.systemsx.ch/about-us/what-issystemsxch/ (3 May 2012, date last accessed).
25. Hobbie KA, Peterson ES, Barton ML, et al. Integration of data systems and technology improves research and collaboration for a superfund research center. JLabAutom 2012;17: 275-83.
26. Vallon-Christersson J, Nordborg N, Svensson M, Hakkinen J. BASE-2nd generation software for microarray data management and analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2009;10:330.
27. Olivier BG, Snoep JL. Web-based kinetic modelling using JWS Online. Bioinformatics 2004;20:2143-4.
28. Taylor CF, Field D, Sansone S-A, et al. Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project. Nat Biotech 2008;26: 889-96.
29. Brazma A, Hingamp P, Quackenbush J, et al. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data. Nat Genet 2001;29: 365-71.
30. Kerrien S, Orchard S, Montecchi-Palazzi L, et al. Broadening the horizon-level 2.5 of the HUPO-PSI format for molecular interactions. BMC Biol. 2007;5:44.
31. Martens L, Chambers M, Sturm M, et al. mzML-a community standard for mass spectrometry data. Mol Cell Proteomics 2011;10: r110.000133.
32. Demir E, Cary MP, Paley S, et al. The BioPAX community standard for pathway data sharing. Nat Biotechnol 2010;28: 935-42.
33. Hucka M, Finney A, Sauro HM, et al. The Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics 2003;19:524-31.
34. Lloyd CM, Halstead MDB, Nielsen PF. CellML: its future, present and past. Prog BiophysMol Biol 2004;85:433-50.
35. Kikuchi N, Kameyama A, Nakaya S, etal. The carbohydrate sequence markup language (CabosML): an XML description of carbohydrate structures. Bioinformatics 2005; 21:1717-8.
36. Novère NL, Hucka M, Mi H, et al. The systems biology graphical notation. Nat Biotechnol 2009;27:735-41.
37. Adamusiak T, Parkinson H, Muilu J, et al. Observ-OM and Observ-TAB: universal syntax solutions for the integration, search, and exchange of phenotype and genotype information. HumMutat 2012;33:867-73.
38. Brazma A, Krestyaninova M, Sarkans U. Standards for systems biology. Nat Rev Genet 2006;7:593-605.
39. Smith B, Ashburner M, Rosse C, et al. The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat Biotechnol 2007;25: 1251-5.
40. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, etal. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 2000;25:25-9.
41. MGEDNETWORK:OntologyWorkingGroup(OWG). http:// mged.sourceforge.net/ontologies/index.php (27 April 2012, date last accessed).
42. Triplet T, Butler G. Systems biology warehousing: challenges and strategies toward effective data integration. In: DBKDA 2011,TheThird International Conference on Advances in Databases, Knowledge, andData Applications 2011, pp. 34-40.
43. Kasprzyk A. BioMart: driving a paradigm change in biological data management. Database 2011;2011.
44. Garcia Castro A, Chen Y-PP, Ragan MA. Information integration in molecular bioscience. Appl Bioinformatics 2005; 4:157-73.
45. Smedley D, Swertz MA, Wolstencroft K, et al. Solutions for data integration in functional genomics: a critical assessment and case study. Brief Bioinformatics 2008;9:532-44.
46. Goble C, Stevens R. State of the nation in data integration for bioinformatics. J Biomed Inform 2008;41:687-93.
47. Butler D. Mashups mix data into global service. Nature 2006;439:6-7.
48. Nolin M-A, Dumontier M, Belleau F, Corbeil J. Building an HIV data mashup using Bio2RDF. Brief Bioinform 2012; 13:98-106.
49. Hull D, Wolstencroft K, Stevens R, etal. Taverna: a tool for building and running workflows of services. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:W729-32.
50. Giardine B, Riemer C, Hardison RC, et al. Galaxy: a platform for interactive large-scale genome analysis. GenomeRes 2005;15:1451-5.
51. Bhagat J, Tanoh F, Nzuobontane E, et al. BioCatalogue: a universal catalogue of web services for the life sciences. Nucleic Acids Res 2010;38:W689-94.
52. Antezana E, Kuiper M, Mironov V. Biological knowledge management: the emerging role of the Semantic Web technologies. Brief Bioinformatics 2009;10:392-407.
53. Stephens S, LaVigna D, DiLascio M, et al. Aggregation of bioinformatics data using Semantic Web technology. Web Semant. 2006;4:216-21.
54. Courtot M, Juty N, Knüpfer C, et al. Controlled vocabularies and semantics in systems biology. Mol Syst Biol 2011;7:543.
55. Wolstencroft K, Owen S, Horridge M, et al. RightField: embedding ontology annotation in spreadsheets. Bioinformatics 2011;27:2021-2.
56. Belleau F, Nolin M-A, Tourigny N, et al. Bio2RDF: towards a mashup to build bioinformatics knowledge systems. J Biomed Inform 2008;41:706-16.
57. Marshall E. Bermuda rules: community spirit, with teeth. Science 2001;291:1192.
58. Swan A, Brown S. To share or not to share: publication and quality assurance of research data outputs. Report commissioned by the Research Information Network (RIN). Annex: detailed findings for the eight research areas (June 2008), 2008;26-9.
59. Data producers deserve citation credit. Nat Genet 2009;41: 1045.
60. Editors. Credit where credit is overdue. NatBiotech 2009;27: 579.
61. Dinasarapu AR, Saunders B, Ozerlat I, et al. Signaling gateway molecule pages-a data model perspective. Bioinformatics 2011;27:1736-38.
62. Yan G, Zhang G, Fang X, et al. Genome sequencing and comparison of two nonhuman primate animal models, the cynomolgus and Chinese rhesus macaques. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:1019-1023.
63. Derradji-Aouat A. Numerical Work for Oceanide Project. A Progress Report.
64. Brase J. DataCite-a global registration agency for research data. In: Fourth International Conference on Cooperation and Promotion of Information Resources in Science andTechnology, 2009. COINFO '09. IEEE, 257-61.
65. Piwowar HA, Day RS, Fridsma DB. Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. PLoS ONE 2007;2:e308.
66. Keeping Research Data Safe (Phase 1). http://www.jisc.ac.uk/ publications/reports/2008/keepingresearchdatasafe.aspx (3 May 2012, date last accessed).
67. Xie F, Zhang D, Wu J, et al. Design and implementation of the first nationwide, web-based Chinese Renal Data System (CNRDS). BMCMed Inform DecisMak 2012;12:11.
68. Wolstencroft K, Owen S, du Preez F, et al. The SEEK: a platform for sharing data and models in systems biology. Meth Enzymol 2011;500:629-55.
69. Sansone S-A, Rocca-Serra P, Field D, et al. Toward interoperable bioscience data. Nat Genet 2012;44:121-6.
70. Dreher F, Kreitler T, Hardt C, et al. DIPSBC-data integration platform for systems biology collaborations. BMC Bioinformatics 2012;13:85.
71. Bauch A, Adamczyk I, Buczek P, et al. openBIS: a flexible framework for managing and analyzing complex data in biology research. BMC Bioinformatics 2011;12:468.
72. Kacsuk P, Sipos G. Multi-grid, multi-user workflows in the P-GRADE grid portal. JGrid Comput 2005;3:221-38.
73. XperimentR. http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/bioinfsupport/ resources/data_management/xperimentr (14 October 2011, date last accessed).
74. Allan C, Burel J-M, Moore J, et al. OMERO: flexible, model-driven data management for experimental biology. NatMethods 2012;9:245-53.
75. Omixed (Scientific Data Organised Via Web Services) Home. http://www.omixed.org/ (4 May 2012, date last accessed).
76. Shannon P, Reiss D, Bonneau R, Baliga N. The Gaggle: an open-source software system for integrating bioinformatics software and data sources. BMC Bioinformatics 2006; 7:176.
77. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, et al. A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 2003;13:2498-504.
78. Genomic Science Program Systems Biology Knowledgebase Projects. http://genomicscience.energy.gov/compbio/kbaseprojects. shtml (3 May 2012, date last accessed).
79. Shah AR, Singhal M, Klicker KR, et al. Enabling highthroughput data management for systems biology: The Bioinformatics Resource Manager. Bioinformatics 2007;23: 906-9.
80. Rocca-Serra P, Brandizi M, Maguire E, et al. ISA software suite: supporting standards-compliant experimental annotation and enabling curation at the community level. Bioinformatics 2010;26:2354-6.
81. Rayner T, Rocca-Serra P, Spellman P, et al. A simple spreadsheet-based, MIAME-supportive format for microarray data: MAGE-TAB. BMC Bioinformatics 2006;7:489.
82. Ho Sui SJ, Begley K, Reilly D, et al. The Stem Cell Discovery Engine: an integrated repository and analysis system for cancer stem cell comparisons. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;40:D984-91.
83. Olsson E, Honeth G, Bendahl P-O, etal. CD44 isoforms are heterogeneously expressed in breast cancer and correlate with tumor subtypes and cancer stem cell markers. BMC Cancer 2011;11:418.
84. Nelson E, Piehler B, Eckels J, et al. LabKey Server: an open source platform for scientific data integration, analysis and collaboration. BMC Bioinformatics 2011;12:71.
85. Dean J, Ghemawat S. MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. Commun ACM 2008;51: 107-113.