A fuzzy based assessment method for comparison of ship launching methods

Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 781-791

  Ozkok, Murat ^a   Cebi, Selcuk ^a  

^a KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

AHP; FIA; Ship launching; SWOT; TOPSIS

Indexed keywords

AHP; FIA; SHIP LAUNCHING; SWOT; TOPSIS;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; LAUNCHING; SHIPYARDS;

SHIPS;

EID: 84892902739     PISSN: 10641246     EISSN: 18758967     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/IFS-130768     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. M. Celik, S. Cebi, C. Kahraman and I. D. Er, Application of axiomatic design and TOPSIS methodologies under fuzzy environment for proposing competitive strategies on Turkish container ports in maritime transportation network, Expert Systems with Applications 36(3) (2009), 4541-4557.
2. L. Eunchang, P. Yongtae and G. S. Jong, Large engineering project risk management using a Bayesian belief network, Expert Systems with Applications 36 (2009), 5880-5887.
3. M. R. Duffey and J. R. Van Dorp, Risk analysis for large engineering projects: Modeling cost uncertainty for ship production activities, Journal of Engineering Valuation and Cost Analysis 2(4) (1999), 285-301.
4. H. L. Yao, G. Chun, S. Z. Lin, J. X. Bai and H. X. Sun, Application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in shipyard Project investment risk recognition, Canadian Social Science 5(5) (2009), 17-25.
5. M. Bakacak, Analysis of the shipbuilding and ship repair accidents, Msc Thesis, Dokuz Eylul University Institute of Social Sciences, Izmir, Turkey, 2007.
6. T. Buksa, D. Pavletic and M. Sokovic, Shipbuilding pipeline production quality improvement, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering 40(2) (2010), 160-166.
7. H. Akyildiz, Launching with airbags, Naval Architecture and Marine Technology Technical Congress, Istanbul, 1(24-35), 2008.
8. T. Y. Hsieh, S. T. Lu and G. T. Tzeng, Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings, International Journal of Project Management 22 (2004), 573-584.
9. S. J. Chen and C. L. Hwang, Fuzzy Multi Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992.
10. S. Opricovic and G. H. Tzeng, Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European Journal of Operational Research 156(2) (2004), 445-455.
11. C. Kahraman and S. Cebi, A new multi-Attribute decision making method: Hierarchical fuzzy axiomatic design, Expert Systems with Applications 34 (2010), 1603-1616.
12. O. Kulak and C. Kahraman, Fuzzy multi-Attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process, Information Sciences 170 (2005), 191-210.
13. O. Kulak and C. Kahraman, Multi-Attribute comparison of advanced manufacturing systems using fuzzy vs. crisp axiomatic design approach, International Journal of Production Economics 95 (2005), 415-424.
14. N. P. Suh, The Principles Of Design, Oxford University Press, New York, 1990.
15. N. P. Suh, Axiomatic Design; Advanced Applications, Oxford University Pres, 2001.
16. N. P. Suh, Complexity Theory and Applications, Oxford University Press, NY, 2005.
17. S. Cebi and C. Kahraman, Developing a group decision support system based on fuzzy information axiom, Knowledge-Based Systems 23(1) (2010), 3-16.
18. T. C. Chen, Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decisionmaking under fuzzy environment, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114 (2000), 1-9.
19. L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Information and Control 8 (1965), 338-353.