Current policies on informed consent in Japan constitute a formidable barrier to emergency research

Resuscitation

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

  Inokuchi, Ryota ^a   Nakajima, Susumu ^a   Yahagi, Naoki ^a   Sato, Hajime ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; JAPAN; LETTER; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; JAPAN; PUBLIC POLICY;

EID: 84892884050     PISSN: 03009572     EISSN: 18731570     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.09.026     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Largent E.A., Wendler D., Emanuel E., Miller F.G. Is emergency research without initial consent justified: the consent substitute model. Arch Intern Med 2010, 170:668-674.
2. Cone D.C., O'Connor R.E. Are US informed consent requirements driving resuscitation research overseas. Resuscitation 2005, 66:141-148.
3. Druml C., Singer E. Consent in emergency care research. Lancet 2011, 378:26-27.
4. Sheehan M. New European Union regulation of clinical trials is not conflicting on deferred consent in emergency situations. BMJ 2013, 346:f1163.
5. Biros M.H., Sargent C., Miller K. Community attitudes towards emergency research and exception from informed consent. Resuscitation 2009, 80:1382-1387.