Big data and false discovery: Analyses of bibliometric indicators from large data sets

Scientometrics

Volumn 98, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 1421-1422

  Prathap, Gangan ^a  

^a CSIR NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION RESOURCES   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892880928     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1063-z     Document Type: Letter

References (8)

1. Csajbók, E., Berhidi, A., Vasas, L., & Schubert, A. (2007). Hirsch-index for countries based on essential science indicators data. Scientometrics, 73(1), 91-117.
2. Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2006). An informetric model for the Hirsch index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 121-129.
3. Glänzel, W. (2006). On the h-index-a mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact. Scientometrics, 67(2), 315-321.
4. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102(46), 16569-16572.
5. Prathap, G. (2010). Is there a place for a mock h-index? Scientometrics, 84, 153-165.
6. Radicchi, F., & Castellano, C. (2013). Analysis of bibliometric indicators for individual scholars in a large data set. Scientometrics, doi: 10. 1007/s11192-013-1027-3.
7. Schubert, A., & Glänzel, W. (2007). A systematic analysis of Hirsch-type indices for journals. Journal of Informetrics, 1(2), 179-184.
8. Ye, F. Y. (2011). A unification of three models for the h-index. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 205-207.