Effects of a school-based prevention programme on smoking in early adolescence: A 6-month follow-up of the 'Eigenständig werden' cluster randomised trial

BMJ Open

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Isensee, Barbara ^a   Hansen, Julia ^a   Maruska, Karin ^a   Hanewinkel, Reiner ^a  

^a IFT Nord   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENCE; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHILD; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GERMANY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HIGH SCHOOL; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; SCHOOL; SCHOOL CHILD; SELF CONCEPT; SMOKING; STUDENT; WORKSHOP; ADOLESCENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEALTH EDUCATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICE; SMOKING CESSATION; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; CHILD; FEMALE; GERMANY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROGRAM EVALUATION; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICES; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; STUDENTS;

EID: 84892880435     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004422     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2013;380: 2224-60.
2. Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung. Der Tabakkonsum Jugendlicher und junger Erwachsener in Deutschland 2012. Ergebnisse einer aktuellen Repräsentativbefragung und Trends. Köln: Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung, 2013.
3. Robert Koch-Institut. Die Gesundheit von Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland. Berlin: Robert Koch-Institut, 2013.
4. World Health Organisation. Life skills education in schools, parts 1 and 2. Geneva: WHO, Division of Mental Health, 1994.
5. Evans RI. Smoking in children: developing a social psychological strategy of deterrence. Prev Med 1976;51:122-7.
6. Donaldson SI, Graham JW, Hansen WB. Testing the generalizability of intervening mechanism theories: understanding the effects of adolescent drug use prevention interventions. J Behav Med 1994;17:195-216. (Pubitemid 24125716)
7. Flay BR. The promise of long-term effectiveness of school-based smoking prevention programs: a critical review of reviews. Tob Induc Dis 2009;5:7.
8. Cuijpers P. Effective ingredients of school-based drug prevention programs. A systematic review. Addict Behav 2002;27:1009-23. (Pubitemid 36158761)
9. Gottfredson DC, Wilson DB. Characteristics of effective school-based substance abuse prevention. Prev Sci 2003;4:27-38. (Pubitemid 39012617)
10. Flay BR. School-based smoking prevention programs with the promise of long-term effects. Tob Induc Dis 2009;5:6.
11. Skara S, Sussman S. A review of 25 long-term adolescent tobacco and other drug use prevention program evaluations. Prev Med 2003;37:451-74. (Pubitemid 37315556)
12. Wiehe SE, Garrison MM, Christakis DA, et al. A systematic review of school-based smoking prevention trials with long-term follow-up. J Adolesc Health 2005;36:162-9. (Pubitemid 40311995)
13. Thomas RE, McLellan J, Perera R. School-based programmes for preventing smoking. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;4: CD001293.
14. Tobler NS, Stratton HH. Effectiveness of school-based drug prevention programs: a meta-analysis of the research. J Prim Prev 1997;18:71-128. (Pubitemid 27349949)
15. Hwang MS, Yeagley KL, Petosa R. A meta-analysis of adolescent psychosocial smoking prevention programs published between 1978 and 1997 in the United States. Health Educ Behav 2004;31:702-19. (Pubitemid 39586109)
16. Ennett ST, Tobler NS, Ringwalt CL, et al. How effective is drug abuse resistance education? A meta-analysis of Project DARE outcome evaluations. Am J Public Health 1994;84:1394-401. (Pubitemid 24290935)
17. Müller-Riemenschneider F, Rasch A, Bockelbrink A, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of behavioural strategies in the prevention of cigarette smoking. GMS Health Technol Assess 2008;4:Doc10.
18. Cuijpers P. Three decades of drug prevention research. Drug Educ Prev Polic 2003;10:7-20. (Pubitemid 36177546)
19. Hansen WB, Dusenbury L, Bishop D, et al. Substance abuse prevention program content: systematizing the classification of what programs target for change. Health Educ Res 2007;22:351-60. (Pubitemid 47355769)
20. Hansen J, Hanewinkel R, Maruska K, et al. The 'Eigenständig werden' prevention trial: a cluster randomised controlled study on a school-based life skills programme to prevent substance use onset. BMJ Open 2011;1:e000352.
21. Gibbons FX, Gerrard M. Predicting young adults' health risk behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 1995;69:505-17.
22. Hawkins JD, Catalano RF, Miller JY. Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychol Bull 1992;112:64-105.
23. Petraitis J, Flay BR, Miller TQ. Reviewing theories of adolescent substance use: organizing pieces in the puzzle. Psychol Bull 1995;117:67-86.
24. Currie C, Molcho M, Boyce W, et al. Researching health inequalities in adolescents: the development of the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) family affluence scale. Soc Sci Med 2008;66:1429-36. (Pubitemid 351232106)
25. Stephenson MT, Hoyle RH, Palmgreen P, et al. Brief measures of sensation seeking for screening and large-scale surveys. Drug Alcohol Depend 2003;72:279-86. (Pubitemid 37485905)
26. Burt RD, Dinh KT, Peterson AV Jr, et al. Predicting adolescent smoking: a prospective study of personality variables. Prev Med 2000;30:115-25. (Pubitemid 30094243)
27. Galanti MR, Siliquini R, Cuomo L, et al. Testing anonymous link procedures for follow-up of adolescents in a school-based trial: the EU-DAP pilot study. Prev Med 2007;44:174-7. (Pubitemid 46186485)
28. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, et al. Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Jon Wiley & Sons, 2009.
29. Feingold A. Effect sizes for growth-modeling analysis for controlled clinical trials in the same metric as for classical analysis. Psychol Methods 2009;14:43-53.
30. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. College Stations, Texas: StataCorp, 2013.
31. Cohen J. Statistical power analyses for behavioral science. Hilldale, New York: Erlbaum, 1988.
32. Bishop DC, Pankratz MM, Hansen WB, et al. Measuring fidelity and adaptation: reliability of a instrument for school-based prevention programs. Eval Health Prof. Epub ahead of print: 19 Feb 2013.
33. Dusenbury L, Brannigan R, Falco M, et al. A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Educ Res 2003;18:237-56. (Pubitemid 36457251)
34. Flay BR, Biglan A, Boruch RF, et al. Standards of evidence: criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Prev Sci 2005;6:151-75. (Pubitemid 43487950)