Removal of adhesive wound dressing and its effects on the stratum corneum of the skin: Comparison of eight different adhesive wound dressings

International Wound Journal

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 50-54

  Matsumura, Hajime ^a   Imai, Ryutaro ^a   Ahmatjan, Niyaz ^a   Ida, Yukiko ^a   Gondo, Masahide ^a   Shibata, Dai ^a   Wanatabe, Katsueki ^a  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Adhesive wound dressings; Dressing removal; Periwound skin; Stratum corneum; Wound dressing

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC CEMENT; ADHESIVE AGENT; POLYURETHAN FOAM; SILICONE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYDROCOLLOID DRESSING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORMAL HUMAN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SKIN EPITHELIUM; SKIN INJURY; STRATUM CORNEUM; SURGICAL TAPE; WOUND DRESSING; WOUND HEALING;

ADHESIVE WOUND DRESSINGS; DRESSING REMOVAL; PERIWOUND SKIN; STRATUM CORNEUM; WOUND DRESSING;

ACRYLATES; ADULT; BANDAGES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POLYURETHANES; SILICONES; SKIN; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84892866799     PISSN: 17424801     EISSN: 1742481X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01061.x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Hollinworth H, White R. The clinical significance of wound pain. In: White R, Harding K, editors. Trauma and pain in wound care. Wounds UK, 2006:3-16.
2. Waring M, Bielfeldt S, Matzold K, Wilhelm KP, Butcher M. An evaluation of the skin stripping of wound dressing adhesives. J Wound Care 2011;20:412, <414, 416-22.
3. van der Valk PG, Maibach HI. A functional study of the skin barrier to evaporative water loss by means of repeated cellophane-tape stripping. Clin Exp Dermatol 1990;15:180-2.
4. Saap L, Fahim S, Arsenault E, Pratt M, Pierscianowski T, Falanga V, Pedvis-Leftick A. Contact sensitivity in patients with leg ulcerations: a North American study. Arch Dermatol 2004;140:1241-6.
5. Simon DA, Dix FP, McCollum CN. Management of venous leg ulcers. BMJ 2004;328:1358-62.
6. Rippon M, White R, Davies P. Skin adhesives and their role in wound dressings. Wounds UK 2007;3:76-86.
7. Dykes PJ, Heggie R, Hill SA. Effects of adhesive dressings on the stratum corneum of the skin. J Wound Care 2001;10:7-10.
8. Principles of best practice: minimising pain at wound dressing-related procedures. A consensusdocument. London: MEP Ltd., 2004. URL http://www.wuwhs.org/datas/2_1/2/A_consensus_document_-_Minimising_pain_at_wound_dressing_related_procedures.pdf [accessed on 8 April 2012].
9. Grocott P. The palliative management of fungating malignant wounds. J Wound Care 2000;9:4-9.
10. Klode J, Schottler L, Stoffels I, Korber A, Schadendorf D, Dissemond J. Investigation of adhesion of modern wound dressings: a comparative analysis of 56 different wound dressings. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2011;25:933-9.
11. Waring M, Rippon M, Bielfeldt S, Brandt M. Cell attachment to adhesive dressings: qualitative and quantitative analysis. Wounds UK 2008;4:35-47.
12. Matsumura H, Imai R, Gondo M, Watanabe K. Evaluation of pain intensity measurement during the removal of wound dressing material using'the PainVision™ system' for quantitative analysis of perception and pain sensation in healthy subjects. Int Wound J 2012; DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00911.x.