Quantitative magnetic susceptibility of the developing mouse brain reveals microstructural changes in the white matter

NeuroImage

Volumn 88, Issue , 2014, Pages 134-142

  Argyridis, Ioannis ^a   Li, Wei ^a   Johnson, G Allan ^a   Liu, Chunlei ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain development; Iron; Myelin; Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM); Susceptibility tensor imaging (STI)

Indexed keywords

IRON; MYELIN;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN SLICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMYELINATION; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; FRACTIONAL ANISOTROPY; GRAY MATTER; HISTOPATHOLOGY; NEUROANATOMY; NEUROIMAGING; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; POSTNATAL DEVELOPMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONTENT; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; ROENTGEN SPECTROSCOPY; SUSCEPTIBILITY WEIGHTED IMAGING; WHITE MATTER; AGE; ANIMAL; ANISOTROPY; C57BL MOUSE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; MOUSE; MYELIN SHEATH; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROCEDURES;

AGE FACTORS; ANIMALS; ANISOTROPY; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; IRON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MYELIN SHEATH; WHITE MATTER;

EID: 84892852119     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.026     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Baloch S., Verma R., Huang H., Khurd P., Clark S., Yarowsky P., Abel T., Mori S., Davatzikos C. Quantification of brain maturation and growth patterns in C57BL/6J mice via computational neuroanatomy of diffusion tensor images. Cereb. Cortex 2009, 19:675-687.
2. Basser P.J., Pierpaoli C. Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J. Magn. Reson. B 1996, 111:209-219.
3. Beaulieu C. The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system - a technical review. NMR Biomed. 2002, 15:435-455.
4. * in the human brain. NMR Biomed. 2010, 23:1071-1076.
5. Bertini I., Luchinat C., Parigi G. Magnetic susceptibility in paramagnetic NMR. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2002, 40:249-273.
6. Bockhorst K.H., Narayana P.a, Liu R., Ahobila-Vijjula P., Ramu J., Kamel M., Wosik J., Bockhorst T., Hahn K., Hasan K.M., Perez-Polo J.R. Early postnatal development of rat brain: in vivo diffusion tensor imaging. J. Neurosci. Res. 2008, 86:1520-1528.
7. Chahboune H., Ment L.R., Stewart W.B., Ma X., Rothman D.L. Neurodevelopment of C57B/L6 mouse brain assessed by in vivo diffusion tensor imaging. NMR Biomed. 2007, 375-382.
8. Connor J.R., Benkovic S.a Iron regulation in the brain: histochemical, biochemical, and molecular considerations. Ann. Neurol. 1992, 32:S51-S61. (Suppl.).
9. Duyn J.H., van Gelderen P., Li T.-Q., de Zwart J.A., Koretsky A.P., Fukunaga M. High-field MRI of brain cortical substructure based on signal phase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:11796-11801.
10. Falcao A.M., Marques F., Novais A., Sousa N., Palha J.A., Sousa J.C. The path from the choroid plexus to the subventricular zone: go with the flow!. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2012, 6:34.
11. Haacke E.M., Cheng N.Y.C., House M.J., Liu Q., Neelavalli J., Ogg R.J., Khan A., Ayaz M., Kirsch W., Obenaus A. Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2005, 23:1-25.
12. He X., Yablonskiy D.A. Biophysical mechanisms of phase contrast in gradient echo MRI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:13558-13563.
13. Holmes-Hampton G.P., Chakrabarti M., Cockrell A.L., McCormick S.P., Abbott L.C., Lindahl L.S., Lindahl P.a. Changing iron content of the mouse brain during development. Metallomics 2012, 4:761-770.
14. Hopp K., Popescu B.F.G., McCrea R.P.E., Harder S.L., Robinson C.a, Haacke M.E., Rajput A.H., Rajput A., Nichol H. Brain iron detected by SWI high pass filtered phase calibrated with synchrotron X-ray fluorescence. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010, 31:1346-1354.
15. Jenkinson M., Bannister P., Brady M., Smith S. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. NeuroImage 2002, 17:825-841.
16. Johnson G.A., Cofer G.P., Gewalt S.L., Hedlund L.W. Morphologic Phenotyping with MR Microscopy: The Visible Mouse1. Radiology 2002, 222(3):789-793.
17. Larvaron P., Boespflug-tanguy O., Renou J., Bonny J. In vivo analysis of the post-natal development of normal mouse brain by DTI. Gene 2007, 413-421.
18. Lee J., Shmueli K., Fukunaga M., van Gelderen P., Merkle H., Silva A.C., Duyn J.H. Sensitivity of MRI resonance frequency to the orientation of brain tissue microstructure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107:5130-5135.
19. Lee J., Shmueli K., Kang B.T., Yao B., Fukunaga M., van Gelderen P., Palumbo S., Bosetti F., Silva A.C., Duyn J.H. The contribution of myelin to magnetic susceptibility-weighted contrasts in high-field MRI of the brain. Neuroimage 2012, 59(4):3967-3975.
20. Lehtinen M.K., Zappaterra M.W., Chen X., Yang Y.J., Hill A.D., Lun M., Maynard T., Gonzalez D., Kim S., Ye P., D'Ercole A.J., Wong E.T., LaMantia A.S., Walsh C.A. The cerebrospinal fluid provides a proliferative niche for neural progenitor cells. Neuron 2011, 69:893-905.
21. Li W., Wu B., Liu C. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation in tissue composition. NeuroImage 2011, 55:1645-1656.
22. Li W., Wu B., Avram A.V., Liu C. Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy of human brain in vivo and its molecular underpinnings. NeuroImage 2012, 59:2088-2097.
23. Li X., Vikram D.S., Lim I.A.L., Jones C.K., Farrell J.a D., van Zijl P.C.M. Mapping magnetic susceptibility anisotropies of white matter in vivo in the human brain at 7T. NeuroImage 2012, 62:314-330.
24. Li W., Wu B., Batrachenko A., Bancroft-Wu V., Morey R.A., Shashi V., Langkammer C., de Bellis M.D., Ropele S., Song A.W., Liu C. Differential developmental trajectories of magnetic susceptibility in human brain gray and white matter over lifespan. Hum. Brain Mapp 2013, (in press). 10.1002/hbm.22360.
25. Liu C. Susceptibility tensor imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 2010, 63:1471-1477.
26. Liu C., Li W., Johnson G.A., Wu B. High-field (9.4T) MRI of brain dysmyelination by quantitative mapping of magnetic susceptibility. NeuroImage 2011, 56:930-938.
27. Lodygensky G.a, Marques J.P., Maddage R., Perroud E., Sizonenko S.V., Hüppi P.S., Gruetter R. In vivo assessment of myelination by phase imaging at high magnetic field. NeuroImage 2012, 59:1979-1987.
28. Lu H., Ge Y. Quantitative evaluation of oxygenation in venous vessels using T2-Relaxation-Under-Spin-Tagging MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2008, 60:357-363.
29. Luo J., He X., d'Avignon D.A., Ackerman J.J.H., Yablonskiy D.a Protein-induced water 1H MR frequency shifts: contributions from magnetic susceptibility and exchange effects. J. Magn. Reson. 2010, 202:102-108.
30. Mori S., Zhang J. Principles of diffusion tensor imaging and its applications to basic neuroscience research. Neuron 2006, 51:527-539.
31. Neil J., Miller J., Mukherjee P., Hüppi P.S. Diffusion tensor imaging of normal and injured developing human brain - a technical review. NMR Biomed. 2002, 15:543-552.
32. Rauscher A., Sedlacik J., Barth M., Mentzel H.-J., Reichenbach J.R. Magnetic susceptibility-weighted MR phase imaging of the human brain. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2005, 26:736-742.
33. Salomir R., de Senneville B.D., Moonen C.T. A fast calculation method for magnetic field inhomogeneity due to an arbitrary distribution of bulk susceptibility. Concepts Magn. Reson. 2003, 19B:26-34.
34. Schäfer A., Wharton S., Gowland P., Bowtell R. Using magnetic field simulation to study susceptibility-related phase contrast in gradient echo MRI. NeuroImage 2009, 48:126-137.
35. * contrast of the cingulum in ultra high fields introduction: methods. Magn. Reson. Med. 2009, 17:49.
36. Schweser F., Lehr B. A novel approach for separation of background phase in SWI phase data utilizing the harmonic function mean value property. Stockholm, Sweden 2010, 18:2010.
37. Schweser F., Deistung A., Lehr B.W., Reichenbach J.R. Differentiation between diamagnetic and paramagnetic cerebral lesions based on magnetic susceptibility mapping. Med. Phys. 2010, 37:5165.
38. Schweser F., Deistung A., Lehr B.W., Reichenbach J.R. Quantitative imaging of intrinsic magnetic tissue properties using MRI signal phase: An approach to in vivo brain iron metabolism?. NeuroImage 2010, 54:2789-2807.
39. *-weighted imaging sequence 2011, 104:11796.
40. Shmueli K., de Zwart J.a, van Gelderen P., Li T.-Q., Dodd S.J., Duyn J.H. Magnetic susceptibility mapping of brain tissue in vivo using MRI phase data. Magn. Reson. Med. 2009, 62:1510-1522.
41. Stueber C., Schaefer A., Waehnert M., Vogt J. Iron and myelin in human brain tissue: histology. PIXE and Ultra-high-field MRI Susceptibility Maps 2012, 23-24. (www.aievolution.com).
42. Yushkevich P.a, Piven J., Hazlett H.C., Smith R.G., Ho S., Gee J.C., Gerig G. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. NeuroImage 2006, 31:1116-1128.
43. Zheng W., Nichol H., Liu S., Cheng Y.-C.N., Haacke E.M. Measuring iron in the brain using quantitative susceptibility mapping and X-ray fluorescence imaging. NeuroImage 2013, 78C:68-74.
44. Zhong K., Leupold J., von Elverfeldt D., Speck O. The molecular basis for gray and white matter contrast in phase imaging. NeuroImage 2008, 40:1561-1566.
45. Zhong K., Ernst T., Buchthal S., Speck O., Anderson L., Chang L. Phase contrast imaging in neonates. NeuroImage 2011, 55:1068-1072.