An airtight approach to the inebriometer: From construction to application with volatile anesthetics

Fly

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 112-117

  Dawson, Adam G ^a   Heidari, Paniz ^a   Gadagkar, Sudhindra R ^b   Murray, Michael J ^c   Call, Gerald B ^a  

^a MIDWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MIDWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Airtight; Anesthesia; Behavioral assay; Construction; Drosophila; Drug response; Inebriometer

Indexed keywords

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

INHALATION ANESTHETIC AGENT; ISOFLURANE;

AIRTIGHT; ANESTHESIA; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL ASSAY; CONSTRUCTION; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG MONITORING; DRUG RESPONSE; GENETICS; INEBRIOMETER; METHODOLOGY; VALIDATION STUDY; DRUG EFFECTS; PROCEDURES;

AIRTIGHT; ANESTHESIA; BEHAVIORAL ASSAY; CONSTRUCTION; DROSOPHILA; DRUG RESPONSE; INEBRIOMETER;

ANESTHETICS, INHALATION; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DRUG MONITORING; ISOFLURANE;

EID: 84892843282     PISSN: 19336934     EISSN: 19336942     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/fly.24142     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Antkowiak B. How do general anaesthetics work? Naturwissenschaften 2001; 88:201-13. PMID:11482433; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s001140100230.
2. Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD, Haynes AB, Lipsitz SR, Berry WR, et al. An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data. Lancet 2008; 372:139-44. PMID:18582931; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140- 6736(08)60878-8.
3. Eger EI 2nd, Raines DE, Shafer SL, Hemmings HC Jr., Sonner JM. Is a new paradigm needed to explain how inhaled anesthetics produce immobility? Anesth Analg 2008; 107:832-48. PMID:18713892; http://dx.doi. org/10.1213/ane.0b013e318182aedb.
4. Humphrey JA, Hamming KS, Thacker CM, Scott RL, Sedensky MM, Snutch TP, et al. A putative cation channel and its novel regulator: cross-species conservation of effects on general anesthesia. Curr Biol 2007; 17:624-9. PMID:17350263; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.02.037.
5. Campagna JA, Miller KW, Forman SA. Mechanisms of actions of inhaled anesthetics. N Engl J Med 2003; 348:2110-24. PMID:12761368; http://dx.doi. org/10.1056/NEJMra021261.
6. Brown EN, Purdon PL, Van Dort CJ. General anesthesia and altered states of arousal: a systems neuroscience analysis. Annu Rev Neurosci 2011; 34:601-28. PMID:21513454; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153200.
7. Hemmings HC Jr. Sodium channels and the synaptic mechanisms of inhaled anaesthetics. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103:61-9. PMID:19508978; http://dx.doi. org/10.1093/bja/aep144.
8. Bellen HJ, Tong C, Tsuda H. 100 years of Drosophila research and its impact on vertebrate neuroscience: a history lesson for the future. Nat Rev Neurosci 2010; 11:514-22. PMID:20383202; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/nrn2839.
9. Allada R, Nash HA. Drosophila melanogaster as a model for study of general anesthesia: the quantitative response to clinical anesthetics and alkanes. Anesth Analg 1993; 77:19-26. PMID:8317731; http://dx.doi. org/10.1213/00000539-199307000-00005.
10. Gamo S, Dodo K, Matakatsu H, Tanaka Y. Molecular genetical analysis of Drosophila ether sensitive mutants. Toxicol Lett 1998; 100-101:329-37. PMID:10049161; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4274(98)00203-3.
11. Krishnan KS, Nash HA. A genetic study of the anesthetic response: mutants of Drosophila melanogaster altered in sensitivity to halothane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990; 87:8632-6. PMID:2122464; http://dx.doi. org/10.1073/pnas.87.21.8632.
12. Scholz H, Franz M, Heberlein U. The hangover gene defines a stress pathway required for ethanol tolerance development. Nature 2005; 436:845-7. PMID:16094367; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature03864.
13. Walcourt A, Nash HA. Genetic effects on an anesthetic-sensitive pathway in the brain of Drosophila. J Neurobiol 2000; 42:69-78. PMID:10623902; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(200001)42:169::AID-NEU73.0.CO;2-#.
14. Walcourt A, Scott RL, Nash HA. Blockage of one class of potassium channel alters the effectiveness of halothane in a brain circuit of Drosophila. Anesth Analg 2001; 92:535-41. PMID:11159264; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1213/00000539-200102000-00047.
15. Liu J, Hu ZY, Ye QQ, Dai SH. Development of three Drosophila melanogaster strains with different sensitivity to volatile anesthetics. [English Edition]. Chin Med J (Engl) 2009; 122:561-5. PMID:19323908.
16. Cohan FM, Graf JD. Latitudinal cline in Drosophila melanogaster for knockdown resistance to ethanol fumes and for rates of response to selection for further resistance. Evolution 1985; 39:278-93. http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/2408362.
17. Weber KE. An Apparatus for Measurement of Resistance to Gas-phase Reagents. Drosoph Inf Serv 1988; 67:90-2.
18. Cohan FM, Hoffmann AA. Genetic divergence under uniform selection. II. Different responses to selection for knockdown resistance to ethanol among Drosophila melanogaster populations and their replicate lines. Genetics 1986; 114:145-64. PMID:3095180.
19. Leibovitch BA, Campbell DB, Krishnan KS, Nash HA. Mutations that affect ion channels change the sensitivity of Drosophila melanogaster to volatile anesthetics. J Neurogenet 1995; 10:1-13. PMID:8618174; http:// dx.doi.org/10.3109/01677069509083455.
20. Campbell DB, Nash HA. Use of Drosophila mutants to distinguish among volatile general anesthetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994; 91:2135-9. PMID:8134360; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.6.2135.
21. Nash HA, Campbell DB, Krishnan KS. New mutants of Drosophila that are resistant to the anesthetic effects of halothane. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1991; 625:540-4. PMID:1905503; http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb33885.x.
22. Moore MS, DeZazzo J, Luk AY, Tully T, Singh CM, Heberlein U. Ethanol intoxication in Drosophila: Genetic and pharmacological evidence for regulation by the cAMP signaling pathway. Cell 1998; 93:997-1007. PMID:9635429; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0092-8674(00)81205-2.
23. Singh CM, Heberlein U. Genetic control of acute ethanol-induced behaviors in Drosophila. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2000; 24:1127-36. PMID:10968649; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb02075.x.
24. Carney FM, Van Dyke RA. Halothane hepatitis: a critical review. Anesth Analg 1972; 51:135-60. PMID:4399967; http://dx.doi. org/10.1213/00000539-197201000-00036.
25. Miller SL. A theory of gaseous anesthetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1961; 47:1515-24. PMID:13770890; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.47.9.1515.
26. Pauling L. A molecular theory of general anesthesia. Science 1961; 134:15-21. PMID:13733483; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.134.3471.15.
27. Sillans D, Biston J. Studies on the anesthetic mechanism of carbon dioxide by using Bombyx mori larvae. Biochimie 1979; 61:153-6. PMID:465567; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9084(79)80063-2.
28. Colinet H, Renault D. Metabolic effects of CO(2) anaesthesia in Drosophila melanogaster. Biol Lett 2012; 8:1050-4. PMID:22915627; http://dx.doi. org/10.1098/rsbl.2012.0601.