Comparative responsiveness and minimal change of the Knee Quality of Life 26-item (KQoL-26) questionnaire

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 22, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 2461-2475

  Chuang, Ling Hsiang ^a   Garratt, Andrew ^b   Brealey, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b NORWEGIAN KNOWLEDGE CENTRE FOR THE HEALTH SERVICES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Effect size; Knee Quality of Life 26 item questionnaire; KQoL 26; Minimal change; Minimal clinical important difference; Minimal detectable change; Receiver operator characteristic curves; Responsiveness; Standardized error of measurement

Indexed keywords

ARTHROSCOPY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISABILITY; EMOTION; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KNEE INJURY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS;

ARTHROSCOPY; DATA COLLECTION; DISABILITY EVALUATION; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GENERAL PRACTITIONERS; HUMANS; KNEE INJURIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84892795781     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-012-0298-0     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Garratt, A. M., Schmidt, L., Mackintosh, A., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2002). Quality of life measurement: Bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. British Medical Journal, 324, 1417-1419.
2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration (2009). Guidance for industry patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims.
3. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. (2008). Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. London, UK: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
4. Garratt, A. M., Brealey, S., & Gillespie, W. (2004). Patientassessed health instruments for the knee: A structured review. Rheumatology (Oxford), 43, 1414-1423.
5. Irrgang, J. J., Anderson, A. F., Boland, A. L., et al. (2001). Development and validation of the international keen documentation committee subjective knee form. American Journal of Sport Medicine, 29, 600-613.
6. Roos, E. M., Roos, H. P., Lohmander, L. S., Ekdahl, C., & Beynnon, B. D. (1998). Knee injuries and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) - development of a self-administered outcome measure. Journal of Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 78, 88-96.
7. Fitzpatrick, R., Davey, C., Buxton, M. J., & Jones, D. R. (1998). Evaluation patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technology Assessment, 2(14), 1-14.
8. Garratt, A. M., Brealey, S., Robling, M., et al. (2008). Development of the knee quality of life (KQoL-26) 26-item questionnaire: Data quality, reliability, validity and responsiveness. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 6, 48-59.
9. Hay, R., & Hadorn, D. (1992). Responsiveness to change: An aspect of validity, not a separate dimension. Quality of Life Research, 1, 73-75.
10. Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2000). Quality of life: Assessment, analysis and interpretation. Chichester: Wiley.
11. Guyatt, G. H., Osoba, D., et al. (2002). Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 77(4), 371-383.
12. Revicki, D., Hays, R. D., Cella, D., & Sloan, J. (2007). Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcome. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61, 102-109.
13. Lysholm, J., & Gillquist, J. (1982). Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 10, 150-154.
14. Brook, R. (1996). EuroQol: The current state of play. Health Policy, 37, 53-72.
15. Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The SF-36 short-form health status survey 1, conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473-483.
16. Brealey, S. D., Atwell, C., Bryan, S., et al. (2006). The DAMASK trial protocol:Apragmatic randomised trial to evaluatewhether GPs should have direct access toMRIfor patients with suspected internal derangement of the knee. BMC Health Services Research, 6, 133.
17. Briggs, K., Lysholm, J., Tegner, Y., Rodkey, W. G., Kocher, M. S., & Steadman, J. R. (2009). The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm Score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the KNEE: 25 year later. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 37, 890-897.
18. Dolan, P. (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care, 35(11), 1095-1108.
19. Ware, J., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1994). SF-36 Physical and mental health survey scale: A user's manual. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.
20. Juniper, E. F., Guyatt, G. H., Willan, A., & Griffith, L. E. (1994). Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 47, 81-87.
21. StataCorp. (2008). Stata statistical software: Release 10.1. College Station (TX): Stata Corporation.
22. SPSS Inc. (2010). SPSS statistical software 17.0. Chicago (IL): SPSS Inc.
23. Cohen, J. (1997). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. New York: Academic Press.
24. Deyo, R. A., & Centor, R. M. (1986). Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: An analogy to diagnostic test performance. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 39, 897-906.
25. Wyrwich, K., Nienaber, N., Tierney, W., & Wolinsky, F. (1999). Linking clinical relevant and statistical significant in evaluating intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. Medical Care, 37, 469-478.
26. Dawson, J., Doll, H., Boller, I., Fitzpatrick, R., Little, C., Rees, J., et al. (2008). Comparative responsiveness and minimal change for the Oxford Elbow Score following surgery. Quality of Life Research, 17(10), 1257-1267.
27. Middel, B., Goudriaan, H., de Greef, M., et al. (2006). Recall bias did not affect perceived magnitude of changes in health-related functional status. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 503-511.
28. Terwee, C. B., Roorda, L. D., Dekker, J., et al. (2010). Mind the MIC: Large variation among populations and methods. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(5), 524-534.