An untold factor that may influence the rate of cesarean section

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 218-

  Matsubara, Shigeki ^a  

^a JICHI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CESAREAN SECTION; DYSTOCIA; FINLAND; HUMAN; JAPAN; LABOR; LETTER; MEDICAL SCHOOL; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; OBSTETRIC PROCEDURE; PERINATAL MORTALITY; PLACENTA ACCRETA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; VAGINAL DELIVERY; WELFARE;

ASPHYXIA NEONATORUM; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS;

EID: 84892787703     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12272     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Pallasmaa N, Alanen A, Ekblad U, Vahlberg T, Koivisto M, Raudaskoski T, et al. Variation in cesarean section rates is not related to maternal and neonatal outcomes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013; 92: 1168-74.
2. Ishikawa K, Sugihara T, Ikeda T, Miyazaki R,. Recent tends in cesarean delivery rates in Japan. J Japan Soc Perinat Neonat Med. 2013; 493: 83-7. (Japanese with English abstract).
3. Matsubara S,. Planned caesarean hysterectomy versus " conserving" caesarean section in patients with placenta accreta. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012; 34: 317-8.