A comparison of Bluetooth low power modes

Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Telecommunications, ConTEL 2003

Volumn 1, Issue , 2003, Pages 121-128

  Karjalainen, Olli ^a   Rantala, Seppo ^b   Kivikoski, Markku ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^b VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Bluetooth; Hold; Low power; Park; Sniff

Indexed keywords

PARKING;

BEST RESPONSE; BLUETOOTH SYSTEMS; CURRENT CONSUMPTION; HOLD; LOW POWER; LOW POWER MODES; PERFORMANCE METRICS; SNIFF;

BLUETOOTH;

EID: 84892764175     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CONTEL.2003.176900     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Specification of the Bluetooth System. Version 1.1, www.bluetooth.org/foundry/specification/document/Bluetooth-V1.1-Core-Specifications/en/1/Bluetooth-V1.1-Core-Specifications.pdf, Bluetooth SIG, 02/2001.
2. J. Haartsen, Bluetooth™: A New Radio Interface Providing Ubiquitous Connectivity, VTC 2000, Vol 1, 2000, pp. 107-111.
3. Bluetooth General Features, www.ericsson.com/bluetooth/files/general-features-010427.pdf, 03/2001.
4. D. Kammer, G. McNutt, Bluetooth Application Developer's Guide: The Short Range Interconnect Solution, Syngress Publishing, 09/2001, 556 pp.
5. S. Garg, M. Kalia, R. Shorey, MAC Scheduling Policies for Power Optimization in Bluetooth: A Master Driven TDD Wireless System, VTC 2000, Vol 1, 2000, pp. 196-200
6. M. Kalia, S. Garg, R. Shorey. Efficient Policies for Increasing Capacity in Bluetooth: An Indoor Pico-Cellular Wireless System, VTC 2000, Vol 1, 2000, pp. 907-911.
7. O. Karjalainen, The Behavior and Performance of Bluetooth Network, Tampere University of Technology, M.Sc. thesis, 06/2002, pp. 46-65