Promoting transparency in social science research

Science

Volumn 343, Issue 6166, 2014, Pages 30-31

  Miguel, E ^a   Camerer, C ^b   Casey, K ^c   Cohen, J ^c   Esterling, K M ^d   Gerber, A ^e   Glennerster, R ^f   Green, D P ^g   Humphreys, M ^g   Imbens, G ^c   Laitin, D ^c   Madon, T ^a   Nelson, L ^a   Nosek, B A ^h,i   Petersen, M ^a   Sedlmayr, R ^j   Simmons, J P ^k   Simonsohn, U ^k   Van Der Laan, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^g University of Virginia ^*  (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

ⁱ CENTER FOR OPEN SCIENCE   (United States)

^j Wellspring Advisors   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVOCACY; DATA QUALITY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK; POLICY MAKING; RESEARCH WORK; STANDARD (REGULATION); STATE ROLE;

ACCURACY; BILLING AND CLAIMS; BUDGET; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DATA BASE; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMICS; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; EXPERIMENTATION; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; EXTERNAL VALIDITY; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; REGISTRATION; REVIEW; SCIENTIST; SOCIOLOGY; ARTICLE; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; RESEARCH; STANDARD;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; UNITED STATES;

DISCLOSURE; HUMANS; RESEARCH; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

EID: 84892730713     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1245317     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. M. F. Castro et al., "Mexico's M&E system: Scaling up from the sectoral to the national level" (Working paper, World Bank, Washington, DC, 2009).
2. Office of Management and Budget, "Use of evidence and evaluation in the 2014 budget" (Memo M-12-14, Office of the President, Washington, DC, 2012).
3. B. A. Nosek et al., Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 7, 615 (2012).
4. A. S. Gerber, N. Malhotra, Q. J. Polit. Sci. 3, 313 (2008).
5. K. Casey et al., Q. J. Econ. 127, 1755 (2012).
6. J. P. Simmons et al., Psychol. Sci. 22, 1359 (2011).
7. J. P. A. Ioannidis, PLOS Med. 2, e124 (2005).
8. W. Stroebe et al., Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 7, 670 (2012).
9. M. Humphreys et al., Polit. Anal. 21, 1 (2013).
10. D. M. Lane, W. P. Dunlap, Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 31, 107 (1978).
11. M. Rosenblum, M. J. Van der Laan, Biometrika 98, 845 (2011).
12. D. Rubin, Ann. Appl. Statist. 2, 808 (2008).
13. Open Science Collaboration, Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 7, 657 (2012).
14. A. S. Gerber et al., Polit. Anal. 9, 385 (2001).
15. U. Simonsohn et al., J. Exp. Psychol. 10.1037/a0033242 (2013).
16. S. Mathieu et al., JAMA 302, 977 (2009).
17. D. A. Zarin, T. Tse, Science 319, 1340 (2008).
18. D. Neumark, Industr. Relat. 40, 121 (2001).