Design of magnetic resonance force microscopy probe based on a commercially available charge coupled device camera

Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology

Volumn 13, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 8086-8089

  Won, Soonho ^a,b   Heo, Jinhee ^b   Joung, Sookyoung ^c  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

^b Korea Institute of Material Science   (South Korea)

^c Konkuk University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

CCD.; Characterization; Nanotechnology; SPM

Indexed keywords

DIPHENYLPICRYLHYDRAZYL; INDUCTIVE METHOD; LOW TEMPERATURE EXPERIMENTS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE FORCE MICROSCOPY; NANOSCALE LEVELS; RESONANCE TECHNIQUE; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; SPM;

CHARACTERIZATION; CHARGE COUPLED DEVICES; EXPERIMENTS; LOW TEMPERATURE TESTING; MAGNETIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NANOTECHNOLOGY; OPTICAL FIBERS; PROBES;

CCD CAMERAS;

EID: 84892726754     PISSN: 15334880     EISSN: 15334899     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2013.8189     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. G. Binning and C. F. Quate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 930 (1986)
2. Y. Martin and H. K. Wickramasinghe, Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 1455 (1987)
3. E. Betzig, M. Isaacson, and A. Lewis, Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 2088 (1987)
4. J. C. Suits, R. H. Geiss, C. J. Lin, D. Rugar, and A. E. Bell, Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 419 (1986)
5. D. Rugar, C. S. Yannoni, and J. A. Sidles, Nature 360, 563 (1992)
6. J. A. Sidles, Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 2854 (1991)
7. J. A. Sidles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1124 (1992)
8. J. A. Sidles and D. Rugar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3506 (1993)
9. H. J. Mamin, M. Poggio, C. L. Degen, and D. Rugar, Nat. Nanotechno. 2, 301 (2007)
10. C. L. Degen, M. Poggio, H. J. Mamin, C. T. Rettner, and D. Rugar, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 1313 (2009)
11. Attocube Systems AG, Königinstrasse 11a RGB 80539 München, Germany (http://www.attocube.com), Model: ANPz101/RES & ANPx101/RES.
12. D. Rugar, H. J. Mamin, and P. Guethner, Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 2588 (1989)
13. K. J. Bruland, J. L. Garbini, W. M. Dougherty, S. H. Chao, S. E. Jensen, and J. A. Sidles, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70, 3542 (1999)
14. J. A. Sidles, J. L. Garbini, and G. P. Drobny, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 3881 (1992)
15. NANOSENSORS, Rue Jaquet-Droz 1, Case Postale 216, CH-2002 Neuchatel Switzerland (http://www.nanosensors.com), Model: TLCONT & Applied NanoStructures Inc., 1700 Wyatt Dr. STE 12 Santa Clara, CA 95054 USA (http://www.appnano.com), Model: SICON-TL.
16. C. P. Slichter, Principle of Magnetic Resonance, 3rd edn., Springer, Heidelberg (1990)This setup is known to the sample-on-cantilever setup, Sometimes, MRFM setup can change in ways to switch the sample and magnet. It is known to the magnet-on-cantilever setup.
17. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd edn., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York (1999)
18. J. P. Cleveland, S. Manne, D. Bocek, and P. K. Hansma, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 64, 403 (1993)
19. S. G. Lee, S. Won, S.-B. Saun, and S. Lee, Nanotechnology 18, 375505 (2007)
20. H. J. Mamin, T. H. Oosterkamp, M. Poggio, C. L. Degen, C. T. Rettner, and D. Rugar, Nano Lett. 9, 3020 (2009)
21. E. W. Moore, S. G. Lee, S. A. Hickman, S. J. Wright, L. E. Harrell, P. P. Borbat, J. H. Freed, and J. A. Marohn, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 22251 (2009)
22. I. Lee, Y. Obukhov, G. Xiang, A. Hauser, F. Yang, P. Banerjee, D. V. Pelekhov, and P. C. Hammel, Nature 466, 845 (2010)