-
1
-
-
80052769095
-
Communicating uncertainties about prescription drugs to the public: A national randomized trial
-
Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Communicating uncertainties about prescription drugs to the public: a national randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(16):1463-1468.
-
(2011)
Arch Intern Med
, vol.171
, Issue.16
, pp. 1463-1468
-
-
Schwartz, L.M.1
Woloshin, S.2
-
2
-
-
79960891488
-
The attitudes of oncology physicians and nurses toward phase I, II, and III cancer clinical trials
-
Zhang J, Zhang H, Yu CH, Li JY, Jiang Y. The attitudes of oncology physicians and nurses toward phase I, II, and III cancer clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2011;32(5):649-653.
-
(2011)
Contemp Clin Trials
, vol.32
, Issue.5
, pp. 649-653
-
-
Zhang, J.1
Zhang, H.2
Yu, C.H.3
Li, J.Y.4
Jiang, Y.5
-
3
-
-
70549113620
-
U.S. physician knowledge of the FDA-approved indications and evidence base for commonly prescribed drugs: Results of a national survey
-
Chen DT, Wynia MK, Moloney RM, Alexander GC. U.S. physician knowledge of the FDA-approved indications and evidence base for commonly prescribed drugs: results of a national survey. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18(11):1094-1100.
-
(2009)
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf
, vol.18
, Issue.11
, pp. 1094-1100
-
-
Chen, D.T.1
Wynia, M.K.2
Moloney, R.M.3
Alexander, G.C.4
-
4
-
-
84862165832
-
-
Berkeley: University of California Press
-
Healy D. Pharmageddon. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2012.
-
(2012)
Pharmageddon
-
-
Healy, D.1
-
5
-
-
41649121737
-
Newly approved does not always mean new and improved
-
Anderson GM, Juurlink D, Detsky AS. Newly approved does not always mean new and improved. JAMA. 2008;299(13):1598-1600.
-
(2008)
JAMA
, vol.299
, Issue.13
, pp. 1598-1600
-
-
Anderson, G.M.1
Juurlink, D.2
Detsky, A.S.3
-
8
-
-
77954882772
-
-
FDA website. Accessed October 7, 2013
-
US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Guidance for Industry: Non-Inferiority Clinical Trials [Draft Guidance]. FDA website. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/ Guidances/UCM202140.pdf. Accessed October 7, 2013.
-
Guidance for Industry: Non-Inferiority Clinical Trials [Draft Guidance]
-
-
-
11
-
-
84892686049
-
-
Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. website. Accessed October 7, 2013
-
Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. Independent Evaluation of FDA's First Cycle Review Performance-Final Report. US Food and Drug Administration website. http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/UserFees/PrescriptionDrugUserFee/ucm127117.htm. Accessed October 7, 2013.
-
Independent Evaluation of FDA's First Cycle Review Performance-Final Report
-
-
-
13
-
-
77951700065
-
-
FDA website. Accessed October 7, 2013
-
US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Drugs@FDA: FDA Approved Drug Products. FDA website. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/drugsatfda/. Accessed October 7, 2013.
-
Drugs@FDA: FDA Approved Drug Products
-
-
-
14
-
-
84892775623
-
-
WHO website. Accessed October 7, 2013
-
World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Center for Drug Statistics Methodology. WHO website. http://www.whocc.no/atc-ddd-index/. 2013. Accessed October 7, 2013.
-
(2013)
-
-
-
15
-
-
70349914121
-
Using effectiveness and cost-effectiveness to make drug coverage decisions: A comparison of Britain, Australia, and Canada
-
Clement FM, Harris A, Li JJ, Yong K, Lee KM, Manns BJ. Using effectiveness and cost-effectiveness to make drug coverage decisions: a comparison of Britain, Australia, and Canada. JAMA. 2009;302(13):1437-1443.
-
(2009)
JAMA
, vol.302
, Issue.13
, pp. 1437-1443
-
-
Clement, F.M.1
Harris, A.2
Li, J.J.3
Yong, K.4
Lee, K.M.5
Manns, B.J.6
-
17
-
-
0034702175
-
Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs
-
Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(25):1887-1892.
-
(2000)
N Engl J Med
, vol.342
, Issue.25
, pp. 1887-1892
-
-
Concato, J.1
Shah, N.2
Horwitz, R.I.3
-
18
-
-
0346099113
-
Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials
-
Smith GCS, Pell JP. Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2003;327(7429):1459-1461.
-
(2003)
BMJ
, vol.327
, Issue.7429
, pp. 1459-1461
-
-
Smith, G.C.S.1
Pell, J.P.2
-
19
-
-
79551529835
-
Equipoise and the dilemma of randomized clinical trials
-
Miller FG, Joffe S. Equipoise and the dilemma of randomized clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(5):476-480.
-
(2011)
N Engl J Med
, vol.364
, Issue.5
, pp. 476-480
-
-
Miller, F.G.1
Joffe, S.2
-
20
-
-
84862841145
-
FDA and pharma seek better ways to assess drug safety, efficacy in clinical trials
-
Mitka M. FDA and pharma seek better ways to assess drug safety, efficacy in clinical trials. JAMA. 2012;307(24):2576-2577.
-
(2012)
JAMA
, vol.307
, Issue.24
, pp. 2576-2577
-
-
Mitka, M.1
-
21
-
-
84892732388
-
-
FDA website. Accessed October 7, 2013
-
US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Innovative Drug Approvals: 2011 Report. FDA website. http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/ReportsManualsForms/Reports/ ucm330502.htm. Accessed October 7, 2013.
-
Innovative Drug Approvals: 2011 Report
-
-
-
22
-
-
84892718077
-
-
FDA website. Accessed October 7, 2013
-
US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). FY 2012 Innovative Drug Approvals. FDA website. http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/ReportsManuals-Forms/Reports/ ucm276385.htm. Accessed October 7, 2013.
-
FY 2012 Innovative Drug Approvals
-
-
-
23
-
-
79958036418
-
Characteristics of clinical trials to support approval of orphan vs nonorphan drugs for cancer
-
Kesselheim AS, Myers JA, Avorn J. Characteristics of clinical trials to support approval of orphan vs nonorphan drugs for cancer. JAMA. 2011;305(22):2320-2326.
-
(2011)
JAMA
, vol.305
, Issue.22
, pp. 2320-2326
-
-
Kesselheim, A.S.1
Myers, J.A.2
Avorn, J.3
-
24
-
-
79955553942
-
Availability of comparative efficacy data at the time of drug approval in the United States
-
Goldberg NH, Schneeweiss S, Kowal MK, Gagne JJ. Availability of comparative efficacy data at the time of drug approval in the United States. JAMA. 2011;305(17):1786-1789.
-
(2011)
JAMA
, vol.305
, Issue.17
, pp. 1786-1789
-
-
Goldberg, N.H.1
Schneeweiss, S.2
Kowal, M.K.3
Gagne, J.J.4
-
25
-
-
0030268577
-
Surrogate end points in clinical trials: Are we being misled?
-
Fleming TR, DeMets DL. Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled? Ann Intern Med. 1996;125(7):605-613.
-
(1996)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.125
, Issue.7
, pp. 605-613
-
-
Fleming, T.R.1
DeMets, D.L.2
-
28
-
-
84862487910
-
A lifecycle approach to the evaluation of FDA approval methods and regulatory actions: Opportunities provided by a new IOM report
-
Psaty BM, Meslin EM, Breckenridge A. A lifecycle approach to the evaluation of FDA approval methods and regulatory actions: opportunities provided by a new IOM report. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2491-2492.
-
(2012)
JAMA
, vol.307
, Issue.23
, pp. 2491-2492
-
-
Psaty, B.M.1
Meslin, E.M.2
Breckenridge, A.3
-
29
-
-
78649744911
-
Shattuck lecture: Innovation, regulation, and the FDA
-
Hamburg MA. Shattuck lecture: innovation, regulation, and the FDA. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(23):2228-2232.
-
(2010)
N Engl J Med
, vol.363
, Issue.23
, pp. 2228-2232
-
-
Hamburg, M.A.1
-
30
-
-
84862239891
-
Regulatory review of novel therapeutics-comparison of three regulatory agencies
-
Downing NS, Aminawung JA, Shah ND, Braunstein JB, Krumholz HM, Ross JS. Regulatory review of novel therapeutics-comparison of three regulatory agencies. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(24):2284-2293.
-
(2012)
N Engl J Med
, vol.366
, Issue.24
, pp. 2284-2293
-
-
Downing, N.S.1
Aminawung, J.A.2
Shah, N.D.3
Braunstein, J.B.4
Krumholz, H.M.5
Ross, J.S.6
-
31
-
-
73949084847
-
Strength of study evidence examined by the FDA in premarket approval of cardiovascular devices
-
Dhruva SS, Bero LA, Redberg RF. Strength of study evidence examined by the FDA in premarket approval of cardiovascular devices. JAMA. 2009;302(24):2679-2685.
-
(2009)
JAMA
, vol.302
, Issue.24
, pp. 2679-2685
-
-
Dhruva, S.S.1
Bero, L.A.2
Redberg, R.F.3
|