Ghost-free derivative interactions for a massive graviton

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2013, Issue 10, 2013, Pages

  Hinterbichler, Kurt ^a  

^a PERIMETER INSTITUTE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (Canada)

Author keywords

Classical theories of gravity; Field theories in higher dimensions

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892724596     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2013)102     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. C. de Rham and G. Gabadadze, Generalization of the Fierz-Pauli Action, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 044020 [arXiv:1007.0443] [INSPIRE].
2. C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze and A.J. Tolley, Resummation of Massive Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 231101 [arXiv:1011.1232] [INSPIRE].
3. M. Fierz and W. Pauli, On relativistic wave equations for particles of arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic field, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 173 (1939) 211 [INSPIRE].
4. S.N. Gupta, Gravitation and Electromagnetism, Phys. Rev. 96 (1954) 1683 [INSPIRE].
5. R.H. Kraichnan, Special-Relativistic Derivation of Generally Covariant Gravitation Theory, Phys. Rev. 98 (1955) 1118 [INSPIRE].
6. S. Weinberg, Photons and gravitons in perturbation theory: Derivation of Maxwell's and Einstein's equations, Phys. Rev. 138 (1965) B988.
7. S. Deser, Sel-nteraction and gauge invariance, Gen. Rel. Grav. 1 (1970) 9 [gr-qc/0411023] [INSPIRE].
8. D.G. Boulware and S. Deser, Classical General Relativity Derived from Quantum Gravity, Annals Phys. 89 (1975) 193 [INSPIRE].
9. J. Fang and C. Fronsdal, Deformation of Gauge Groups. Gravitation, J. Math. Phys. 20 (1979) 2264 [INSPIRE].
10. R.M. Wald, Spin-2 Fields and General Covariance, Phys. Rev. D 33 (1986) 3613 [INSPIRE].
11. C. Lanczos, A Remarkable property of the Riemann-Christo-el tensor in four dimensions, Annals Math. 39 (1938) 842.
12. D. Lovelock, The Einstein tensor and its generalizations, J. Math. Phys. 12 (1971) 498 [INSPIRE].
13. B. Zumino, Gravity Theories in More Than Four-Dimensions, Phys. Rept. 137 (1986) 109 [INSPIRE].
14. S. Cnockaert and M. Henneaux, Lovelock terms and BRST cohomology, Class. Quant. Grav. 22 (2005) 2797 [hep-th/0504169] [INSPIRE].
15. S. Deser and J. Franklin, Canonical Analysis and Stability of Lanczos-Lovelock Gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 072001 [arXiv:1110.6085] [INSPIRE].
16. D. Boulware and S. Deser, Can gravitation have a finite range?, Phys. Rev. D 6 (1972) 3368 [INSPIRE].
17. S. Hassan and R.A. Rosen, Resolving the Ghost Problem in non-Linear Massive Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 041101 [arXiv:1106.3344] [INSPIRE].
18. S. Hassan and R.A. Rosen, Confirmation of the Secondary Constraint and Absence of Ghost in Massive Gravity and Bimetric Gravity, JHEP 04 (2012) 123 [arXiv:1111.2070] [INSPIRE].
19. S. Deser and A. Waldron, Acausality of Massive Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 111101 [arXiv:1212.5835] [INSPIRE].
20. B. Zumino, Effective Lagrangians and Broken Symmetries, Brandeis Univ. Lectures on Elementary Particles and Quantum Field Theory 2 (1970) 437.
21. K. Hinterbichler, Theoretical Aspects of Massive Gravity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012) 671 [arXiv:1105.3735] [INSPIRE].
22. S. Folkerts, A. Pritzel and N. Wintergerst, On ghosts in theories of self-interacting massive spin-2 particles, arXiv:1107.3157 [INSPIRE].
23. A.E. Gumrukcuoglu, C. Lin and S. Mukohyama, Cosmological perturbations of self-accelerating universe in nonlinear massive gravity, JCAP 03 (2012) 006 [arXiv:1111.4107] [INSPIRE].
24. N. Arkani-Hamed, H. Georgi and M.D. Schwartz, Effective field theory for massive gravitons and gravity in theory space, Annals Phys. 305 (2003) 96 [hep-th/0210184] [INSPIRE].
25. P. Creminelli, A. Nicolis, M. Papucci and E. Trincherini, Ghosts in massive gravity, JHEP 09 (2005) 003 [hep-th/0505147] [INSPIRE].
26. C. de Rham and G. Gabadadze, Selftuned Massive Spin-2, Phys. Lett. B 693 (2010) 334 [arXiv:1006.4367] [INSPIRE].
27. K. Koyama, G. Niz and G. Tasinato, The Self-Accelerating Universe with Vectors in Massive Gravity, JHEP 12 (2011) 065 [arXiv:1110.2618] [INSPIRE].
28. G. Tasinato, K. Koyama and G. Niz, Vector instabilities and self-acceleration in the decoupling limit of massive gravity, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 064029 [arXiv:1210.3627] [INSPIRE].
29. C. De-ayet, S. Deser and G. Esposito-Farese, Arbitrary p-form Galileons, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 061501 [arXiv:1007.5278] [INSPIRE].
30. C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze, L. Heisenberg and D. Pirtskhalava, Cosmic Acceleration and the Helicity-0 Graviton, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 103516 [arXiv:1010.1780] [INSPIRE].
31. G. Chkareuli and D. Pirtskhalava, Vainshtein Mechanism In -3-Theories, Phys. Lett. B 713 (2012) 99 [arXiv:1105.1783] [INSPIRE].
32. L. Berezhiani, G. Chkareuli and G. Gabadadze, Restricted Galileons, arXiv:1302.0549 [INSPIRE].
33. L. Berezhiani, G. Chkareuli, C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze and A. Tolley, Mixed Galileons and Spherically Symmetric Solutions, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 184003 [arXiv:1305.0271] [INSPIRE].
34. M.A. Luty, M. Porrati and R. Rattazzi, Strong interactions and stability in the DGP model, JHEP 09 (2003) 029 [hep-th/0303116] [INSPIRE].
35. K. Hinterbichler, M. Trodden and D. Wesley, Multi-field galileons and higher co-dimension branes, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 124018 [arXiv:1008.1305] [INSPIRE].
36. C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze, L. Heisenberg and D. Pirtskhalava, Non-Renormalization and Naturalness in a Class of Scalar-Tensor Theories, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 085017 [arXiv:1212.4128] [INSPIRE].
37. G. D'Amico et al., Massive Cosmologies, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 124046 [arXiv:1108.5231] [INSPIRE].
38. S. Hassan, A. Schmidt-May and M. von Strauss, On Consistent Theories of Massive Spin-2 Fields Coupled to Gravity, JHEP 05 (2013) 086 [arXiv:1208.1515] [INSPIRE].