Comparative effectiveness of ruptured cerebral aneurysm therapies: Propensity score analysis of clipping versus coiling

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 164-169

  McDonald, Jennifer S ^a   McDonald, R J ^a   Fan, J ^a   Kallmes, D F ^a   Lanzino, G ^a   Cloft, H J ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS; ANEURYSM CLIP; APHASIA; ARTICLE; BRAIN ARTERY ANEURYSM RUPTURE; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DATA BASE; FEMALE; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMAN; HYDROCEPHALUS; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATION; PARAPLEGIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROPENSITY SCORE; RISK; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SHUNTING; SURGICAL CLIPPING; SURGICAL COILING; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TRACHEOSTOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

AGED; ANEURYSM, RUPTURED; CEREBRAL REVASCULARIZATION; EMBOLIZATION, THERAPEUTIC; FEMALE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PREVALENCE; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84892711949     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: 1936959X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3642     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809-17
2. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267-74
3. Nichols DA, Brown RD Jr, Meyer FB. Coils or clips in subarachnoid haemorrhage? Lancet 2002;360:1262-63
4. Klompenhouwer EG, Dings JT, van Oostenbrugge RJ, et al. Single-center experience of surgical and endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:570-75
5. Qureshi AI, Vazquez G, Tariq N, et al. Impact of international subarachnoid aneurysm trial results on treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States. J Neurosurg 2011;114: 834-41
6. O'Kelly CJ, Kulkarni AV, Austin PC, et al. The impact of therapeutic modality on outcomes following repair of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: an administrative data analysis. J Neurosurg 2010; 113:795-801
7. Gnanalingham KK, Apostolopoulos V, Barazi S, et al. The impact of the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) on the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage in a neurosurgical unit in the UK. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2006;108:117-23
8. Dumont AS, Crowley RW, Monteith SJ, et al. Endovascular treatment or neurosurgical clipping of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: effect on angiographic vasospasm, delayed ischemic neurological deficit, cerebral infarction, and clinical outcome. Stroke 2010;41:2519-24
9. Hoh BL, Chi YY, Lawson MF, et al. Length of stay and total hospital charges of clipping versus coiling for ruptured and unruptured adult cerebral aneurysms in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database 2002 to 2006. Stroke 2010;41:337-42
10. Cowan JA Jr, Ziewacz J, Dimick JB, et al. Use of endovascular coil embolization and surgical clip occlusion for cerebral artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2007;107:530-35
11. Premier Research Services. Premier Perspective Database. Charlotte, North Carolina: 2012
12. Ho DE, Imai K, King G, et al. MatchIt: Nonparametric Preprocessing for Parametric Causal Inference. 2011. http://gking.harvard.edu/matchit. Accessed June 11, 2013.
13. McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Bida JP, et al. Intravenous contrast induced nephropathy: causal or coincident phenomenon? Radiology 2013;267:106-18
14. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 2005;43:1130-39
15. Lin DY, Psaty BM, Kronmal RA. Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies. Biometrics 1998;54:948-63
16. Taki W, Sakai N, Suzuki H. Determinants of poor outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage when both clipping and coiling are available: Prospective Registry of Subarachnoid Aneurysms Treatment (PRESAT) in Japan. World Neurosurg 2011;76:437-45
17. Leake CB, Brinjikji W, Kallmes DF, et al. Increasing treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms at high-volume centers in the United States. J Neurosurg 2011;115:1179-83
18. Coley S, Sneade M, Clarke A, et al. Cerecyte coil trial: procedural safety and clinical outcomes in patients with ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:474-80
19. McDougall CG, Spetzler RF, Zabramski JM, et al. The Barrow ruptured aneurysm trial. J Neurosurg 2012;116:135-44
20. Berthelsen CL. Evaluation of coding data quality of the HCUP National Inpatient Sample. Top Health Inf Manage 2000;21:10-23
21. Molyneux AJ, Kerr R, Langham J, et al. Applicability of coiling for subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet 2005;366:1924
22. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Birks J, et al. Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT): long-term followup. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:427-33
23. Johnston SC, Dowd CF, Higashida RT, et al. Predictors of rehemorrhage after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the cerebral aneurysm rerupture after treatment (CARAT) study. Stroke 2008;39:120-25