Performance validation in anatomic pathology: Successful integration of a new classification system into the practice setting using the updated lung non-small cell carcinoma recommendations

Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Volumn 138, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 105-109

  Murugan, Paari ^a,b   Stevenson, Michael E ^a   Hassell, Lewis A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892705998     PISSN: 00039985     EISSN: 15432165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0750-OA     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, et al. International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6(2):244-285.
2. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, et al. International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society: international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma: executive summary. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2011;8(5):381-385.
3. Cagle PT, Allen TC, Dacic S, et al. Revolution in lung cancer: or new challenges for the surgical pathologist Arch Pathol Lab Med 2011;135(1):110-116.
4. Cagle P. Paper presented at: 2012 Annual Scientific Meeting of the Oklahoma State Association of Pathologists; May 19, 2012; Oklahoma City, OK.
5. Kerr KM. Diagnostic aspects of pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Paper presented at: CAP '11: College of American Pathologists Annual Meeting; September 11, 2011; San Diego, CA. AP110.
6. Cagle PT, Dacic S, Popper HH. Insights and controversies in pulmonary neoplasia. Paper presented at: CAP '11: College of American Pathologists Annual Meeting; September 12, 2011, San Diego, CA. AP112.
7. Nakhleh R, Coffin C, Cooper K; Association of Directors of Anatomic Surgical Pathology. Recommendations for quality assurance and improvement in surgical and autopsy pathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;126(3):337-340.
8. Zarbo RJ, Meier FA, Raab SS. Error detection in anatomic pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129(10):1237-1245.
9. Maxwell ML, Raab SS. Quality assurance and regulations for anatomic pathology. In: Cheng L, Bostwick DG, eds. Essentials of Anatomic Pathology. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2011:481-488.
10. Idowu MO, Nakhleh RE. Quality management in anatomic pathology. In: Wagar EA, Horowitz RE, Seigal GE, eds. Laboratory Administration for Pathologists. Northfield, IL: CAP Press; 2011:137-150.
11. Foucar E. Classification in anatomic pathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;116(suppl 1):S5-S20.
12. Black-Shaffer WS, Young RH, Harris NL. Subspecialization of surgical pathology at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Am J Clin Pathol 1996;106(4)(suppl 1):S33-S42.
13. Nayar R, Soloman D, eds. NCI Bethesda System Web site atlas. http://nih. techriver.net/. Accessed December 19, 2012.
14. Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology. Image atlas. http://www. papsociety.org./atlas.html. Accessed December 19, 2012.
15. Smith AE, Sherman ME, Scott DR, et al. Review of the Bethesda System Atlas does not improve reproducibility or accuracy in the classification of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance smears. Cancer 2000;90(4):201-206.