A mash-up application utilizing hybridized filtering techniques for recommending events at a social networking site

Social Network Analysis and Mining

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 231-239

  Kayaalp, Mehmet ^a   Özyer, Tansel ^a   Özyer, Sibel T ^b  

^a TOBB UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND TECHNOLOGY   (Turkey)

^b CANKAYA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Collaborative filtering; Content filtering; Recommendation; Social networking; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE FILTERING; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; LOCATION; PEER TO PEER NETWORKS; WEB SERVICES; WEBSITES;

CONTENT FILTERING; FILTERING TECHNIQUE; GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION INFORMATION; GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATIONS; RECOMMENDATION; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES; WEB 2.0;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84892700059     PISSN: 18695450     EISSN: 18695469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13278-010-0010-8     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A (2005) Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 17(6):734–749
2. Balabanović M, Shoham Y (1997) Fab: content-based, collaborative recommendation. Commun ACM 40(3):66–72
3. Chee S, Han J, Wang K (2001) Rectree: an efficient collaborative filtering method. In: 3rd International conference on data ware-housing and knowledge discovery (DAWAK 2001), LNCS 2114. Springer, Munich, Germany
4. Churchill EF, Halverson CA (2005) Guest Editors’ introduction: social networks and social networking. IEEE Internet Comput 9(5):14–19
5. Faloutsos C, Oard DW (1995) A survey of information retrieval and filtering methods. UM Computer Science Department; CS-TR-3514. http://hdl.handle.net/1903/436. Accessed 10 Mar 2010
6. Fielding RT (2000) Architectural styles and the design of network-based software. Dissertation for the Doctor of Philosophy in Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine
7. Goldberg D, Nichols D, Oki BM, Terry D (1992) Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Commun ACM 35(12):61–70
8. Kobayashi M, Takeda K (2000) Information retrieval on the web. ACM Computing Surveys, vol 32, no 2, pp 144–173
9. Kosala R, Blockeel H (2000) Web mining research: a survey. SIGKDD Explor Newslett 2(1):1–15
10. Németh B (2006) How do I know what you like? The ways of collaborative filtering. In: 7th international symposium of Hungarian researchers on computational intelligence, pp 575–582
11. Newman MEJ, Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (2002) Random graph models of social networks. PNAS 99, 90001, pp 2566–2572
12. O’Reilly T (2006) What is Web 2.0. O’Reilly Network. http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html. Accessed 06 Aug 2006
13. Pierce ME, Fox GC, Rosen J, Maini S, Choi JY (2008) Social networking for scientists using tagging and shared bookmarks: a Web 2.0 application. International symposium on collaborative technologies and systems (CTS), pp 257–266
14. Raghavan P (1997) Information retrieval algorithms: a survey. In: SODA ‘97: proceedings of the eighth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms, pp 11–18
15. Resnick P, Varian H (1997) Recommender systems. Commun ACM 40(3):56–58
16. Schafer JB, Konstan J, Riedi J (1999) Recommender systems in e-commerce. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on electronic commerce (Denver, Colorado, United States, November 3–5, 1999). EC 99. ACM, New York, NY, pp 158–166
17. Schafer JB, Konstan J, Riedi J (1999) Recommender systems in e-commerce. In: EC ‘99: proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on electronic commerce, ACM, NY, USA, pp 158–166
18. Web Services Glossary (2004) W3C Working Group Note. http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-gloss/. Accessed 11 Feb 2004