Exploring the magic of WAND

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 58-65

  Petri, Matthias ^a,b   Culpepper, J Shane ^a   Moffat, Alistair ^b  

^a RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Information retrieval; Performance; Text indexing

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING;

COMPUTATIONAL OVERHEADS; LARGE AMOUNTS OF DATA; PERFORMANCE; PROCESSING ALGORITHMS; PROCESSING REGIMES; PROCESSING STRATEGIES; RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; TEXT-INDEXING;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 84892693087     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2537734.2537744     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. V. N. Anh and A. Moffat. Pruned query evaluation using pre computed impacts. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 372-379, 2006.
2. V. N. Anh, O. de Kretser, and A. Moffat. Vector-space ranking with effective early termination. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 35-42, 2001.
3. T. G. Armstrong, A. Moffat, W. Webber, and J. Zobel. Improvements that don't add up: Ad-hoc retrieval results since 1998. In Proc. CIKM, pages 601-610, 2009.
4. A. Z. Broder, D. Carmel, H. Herscovici, A. Soffer, and J. Zien. Efficient query evaluation using a two-level retrieval process. In Proc. CIKM, pages 426-434, 2003.
5. A. Broschart and R. Schenkel. High-performance processing of text queries with tunable pruned term and term pair indexes. ACM Trans. Information Systems, 30(1):1-32, 2012.
6. E. W. Brown. Fast evaluation of structured queries for information retrieval. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 30-38, 1995.
7. C. Buckley and A. F. Lewit. Optimization of inverted vector searches. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 97-110, 1985.
8. S. Büttcher, C. L. A. Clarke, and G. V. Cormack. Information Retrieval: Implementing and evaluating search engines. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2010.
9. C. Dimopoulos, S. Nepomnyachiy, and T. Suel. Optimizing top-κ document retrieval strategies for block-max indexes. In Proc. WSDM, pages 113-122, 2013.
10. S. Ding and T. Suel. Faster top-κ retrieval using block-max indexes. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 993-1002, 2011.
11. M. Fontoura, V. Josifovski, J. Liu, S. Venkatesan, X. Zhu, and J. Zien. Evaluation strategies for top-κ queries over memory-resident inverted indexes. Proc. VLDB Endowment, 4(12):1213-1224, 2011.
12. C. Kohlschütter, P. Fankhauser, and W. Nejdl. Boilerplate detection using shallow text features. In Proc. WSDM, pages 441-450, 2010.
13. R. Konow, G. Navarro, C. L. A. Clarke, and A. López-Ortíz. Faster and smaller inverted indices with treaps. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 193-202, 2013.
14. D. Metzler and W. B. Croft. A Markov random field model for term dependencies. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 472-479, 2005.
15. A. Moffat and J. Zobel. Self indexing inverted files for fast text retrieval. ACM Trans. Information Systems, 14(4):349-379, 1996.
16. M. Persin, J. Zobel, and R. Sacks-Davis. Filtered document retrieval with frequency sorted indexes. JASIST, 47(10):749-764, 1996.
17. S. E. Robertson, S. Walker, S. Jones, M. Hancock-Beaulieu, and M. Gatford. Okapi at TREC-3. In Proc. TREC-3, 1994.
18. T. Strohman, H. Turtle, and W. B. Croft. Optimization strategies for complex queries. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 219-225, 2005.
19. H. Turtle and J. Flood. Query evaluation: strategies and optimizations. Information Processing and Management, 31(6):831-850, 1995.
20. E. M. Voorhees and D. K. Harman. Overview of the Eighth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-8). In Proc. TREC-8, pages 1-24, 1999.
21. J. Zobel and A. Moffat. Inverted files for text search engines. ACM Computing Surveys, 38(2):6-1-6-56, 2006.