Protein models: The Grand Challenge of protein docking

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 82, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 278-287

  Anishchenko, Ivan ^a,b   Kundrotas, Petras J ^a   Tuzikov, Alexander V ^b   Vakser, Ilya A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b UNITED INSTITUTE OF INFORMATICS PROBLEMS   (Belarus)

Author keywords

Benchmark sets; Protein interactions; Protein modeling; Protein recognition; Structure prediction

Indexed keywords

MONOMER;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR MODEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

RUMEX;

BENCHMARK SETS; PROTEIN INTERACTIONS; PROTEIN MODELING; PROTEIN RECOGNITION; STRUCTURE PREDICTION;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; REFERENCE STANDARDS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84892669774     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24385     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Levitt M. Nature of the protein universe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:11079-11084.
2. Zhang Y, Hubner IA, Arakaki AK, Shakhnovich E, Skolnick J. On the origin and highly likely completeness of single-domain protein structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:2605-2610.
3. Skolnick J, Arakaki AK, Lee SY, Brylinski M. The continuity of protein structure space is an intrinsic property of proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:15690-15695.
4. Vakser IA, Kundrotas P. Predicting 3D structures of protein-protein complexes. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2008;9:57-66.
5. Kozakov D, Brenke R, Comeau SR, Vajda S. PIPER: an FFT-based protein docking program with pairwise potentials. Proteins 2006;65:392-406.
6. Mintseris J, Pierce B, Wiehe K, Anderson R, Chen R, Weng Z. Integrating statistical pair potentials into protein complex prediction. Proteins 2007;69:511-520.
7. de Vries SJ, van Dijk M, Bonvin AMJJ. The HADDOCK web server for data-driven biomolecular docking. Nat Protoc 2010;5:883-897.
8. Pieper U, Eswar N, Braberg H, Madhusudhan MS, Davis FP, Stuart AC, Mirkovic N, Rossi A, Marti-Renom MA, Fiser A, Webb B, Greenblatt D, Huang CC, Ferrin TE, Sali A. MODBASE, a database of annotated comparative protein structure models, and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:D217-222.
9. Aloy P, Russell RB. Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:5896-5901.
10. Grimm V, Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Benchmarking of dimeric threading and structure refinement. Proteins 2006;63:457-465.
11. Kundrotas PJ, Lensink MF, Alexov E. Homology-based modeling of 3D structures of protein-protein complexes using alignments of modified sequence profiles. Int J Biol Macromol 2008;43:198-208.
12. Kundrotas PJ, Zhu Z, Janin J, Vakser IA. Templates are available to model nearly all complexes of structurally characterized proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:9438-9441.
13. Vakser IA. Low-resolution structural modeling of protein interactome. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2013;23:198-205.
14. Samudrala R, Levitt M. Decoys 'R' Us: a database of incorrect conformations to improve protein structure prediction. Protein Sci 2000;9:1399-1401.
15. Carbajo D, Tramontano A. A resource for benchmarking the usefulness of protein structure models. BMC Bioinformatics 2012;13:188.
16. Brylinski M, Skolnick J. Q-DockLHM: low-resolution refinement for ligand comparative modeling. J Comput Chem 2010;31:1093-1105.
17. Douguet D, Chen HC, Tovchigrechko A, Vakser IA. DOCKGROUND resource for studying protein-protein interfaces. Bioinformatics 2006;22:2612-2618.
18. Hwang H, Vreven T, Janin J, Weng Z. Protein-protein docking benchmark version 4.0. Proteins 2010;78:3111-3114.
19. Tovchigrechko A, Wells CA, Vakser IA. Docking of protein models. Protein Sci 2002;11:1888-1896.
20. Gao Y, Douguet D, Tovchigrechko A, Vakser IA. DOCKGROUND system of databases for protein recognition studies: unbound structures for docking. Proteins 2007;69:845-851.
21. Elber R, Karplus M. A method for determining reaction paths in large molecules-application to myoglobin. Chem Phys Lett 1987;139:375-380.
22. Chu JW, Trout BL, Brooks BR. A super-linear minimization scheme for the Nudged Elastic Band method. J Chem Phys 2003;119:12708-12717.
23. Needleman S, Wunsch CD. A general method applicable to search for similarities in amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol 1970;48:443-453.
24. Gotoh O. An improved algorithm for matching biological sequences. J Mol Biol 1982;162:705-708.
25. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of database programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:3389-3402.
26. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. Performance evaluation of amino acid substitution matrices. Proteins 1993;17:49-61.
27. Petrey D, Xiang ZX, Tang CL, Xie L, Gimpelev M, Mitros T, Soto CS, Goldsmith-Fischman S, Kernytsky A, Schlessinger A, Koh IYY, Alexov E, Honig B. Using multiple structure alignments, fast model |building, and energetic analysis in fold recognition and homology modeling. Proteins 2003;53:430-435.
28. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983;22:2577-2637.
29. Onufriev A, Bashford D, Case DA. Exploring protein native states and large-scale conformational changes with a modified generalized Born model. Proteins 2004;55:383-394.
30. Case DA, Darden TA, Cheatham TE, Simmerling C, Wang J, Duke RE, Luo R, Crowley M, Walker RC, Zhang W, Merz KM, Wang B, Hayik S, Roitberg A, Seabra G, Kolossviry I, Wong KF, Paesani F, Vanicek J, Wu X, Brozell SR, Steinbrecher T, Gohlke H, Yang L, Tan C, Mongan J, Hornak V, Cui G, Mathews DH, Seetin MG, Sagui C, Babin V, Kollman PA. AMBER 10. San Francisco: University of California; 2008.
31. Duan Y, Wu C, Chowdhury S, Lee MC, Xiong G, Zhang W, Yang R, Cieplak P, Luo R, Lee T, Caldwell J, Wang J, Kollman PA. A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations. J Comput Chem 2003;24:1999-2012.
32. Kundrotas PJ, Vakser IA. Accuracy of protein-protein binding sites in high-throughput template-based modeling. PLoS Comp Biol 2010;6:e1000727.
33. Moult J, Fidelis K, Kryshtafovych A, Tramontano A. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-round IX. Proteins 2011;79(Suppl 10):1-5.
34. Zemla A. LGA: a method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures. Nucl Acid Res 2003;31:3370-3374.