H2 coproduction in IGCC with CCS via coal and biomass mixture using advanced technologies

Applied Energy

Volumn 118, Issue , 2014, Pages 258-270

  Chen, Qin ^a   Rao, Ashok ^a   Samuelsen, Scott ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Advanced technologies; Biomass cofeeding; Carbon capture and storage; IGCCl

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; BITUMINOUS COAL; CARBON CAPTURE; CARBON DIOXIDE; COSTS; DESIGN; FEEDSTOCKS; GASIFICATION; MIXTURES; TECHNOLOGY;

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY; CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE; CO-FEEDING; CO-PRODUCTION; IGCCL;

COAL GASIFICATION PLANTS;

BIOMASS; COOLING; DESIGN; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; GAS PRODUCTION; HEATING; HYDROGEN; LIGNITE; MEMBRANE; MOISTURE CONTENT; OXYGEN; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84892666608     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.051     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Conti J, Holtberg P. International energy outlook 2013. Energy Information Administration (EIA); 2013.
2. September 2013 Monthly Energy Review. US energy information administration. [accessed 10.10.13]. http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/#environment.
3. Rao A.D., Samuelsen G.S., Yi Y. Gas turbine based high-efficiency 'vision 21' natural gas and coal central plants. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A Power Energy 2005, 219(2):127-136.
4. Siemens Fuel Gasification Technology. Siemens energy sector; 2008. [accessed 10.10.13]. http://www.energy.siemens.com.cn/CN/downloadCenter/Documents/E_F_fuel_gasifier_en.pdf.
5. van der Ploeg HJ, Chhoa T, Zuideveld PL. The shell coal gasificaion process for the US industry. In: Gasification technology conference. Washington DC, USA; Octorber 2004.
6. Li M., Rao A.D., Scott Samuelsen G. Performance and costs of advanced sustainable central power plants with CCS and H2 co-production. Appl Energy 2012, 91(1):43-50.
7. Cormos C.-C. Hydrogen and power co-generation based on coal and biomass/solid wastes co-gasification with carbon capture and storage. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37(7):5637-5648.
8. Cory KS, Swezey BG. Renewable portfolio standards in the states: balancing goals and implementation strategies. National Renewable Energy Laboratory/US Department of Energy Technical, Report, NREL/TP-670-41409; December 2007.
9. California Energy Commission. [accessed 10.10.13'. http://www.energy.ca.gov.
10. O'Hayre R.P., Cha S.-W., Colella W., Prinz F.B. Fuel cell fundamentals 2006, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
11. von Helmolt R., Eberle U. Fuel cell vehicles: status 2007. J Power Sour 2007, 165(2):833-843.
12. Valero A., Usón S. Oxy-co-gasification of coal and biomass in an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plant. Energy 2006, 31(10-11):1643-1655.
13. Cormos C.-C., Padurean A., Agachi P.S. Technical evaluations of carbon capture options for power generation from coal and biomass based on integrated gasification combined cycle scheme. Energy Proc 2011, 4:1861-1868.
14. Kreutz TG, Larson ED, Liu G, Williams RH. Fischer-tropsch fuels from coal and biomass. In: 25th Annual international pittsburgh coal conference. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; September 29 - October 2; 2008.
15. Liu G., Larson E.D., Williams R.H., Kreutz T.G., Guo X. Making fischer-tropsch fuels and electricity from coal and biomass: performance and cost analysis. Energy Fuels 2011, 25(1):415-437.
16. Repasky JM, Foster EP, Armstrong PA, Stein VE, Anderson LL. ITM Oxygen Development for Advanced Oxygen Supply. Gasification Technologies Council. San Francisco, California, USA; October 12, 2011.
17. Rosen L., Degenstein N., Shah M., Wilson J., Kelly S., Peck J., et al. Development of oxygen transport membranes for coal-based power generation. Energy Proc 2011, 4:750-755.
18. Siriwardane RV, Cicero DC, Jain S, Raghubir, Gupta P, Turk BS. Durable zinc oxide-based regenerable sorbents for desulfurization of syngas in a fixed-bed reactor. In: Fifth international symposium on gas cleaning at high temperature; September 17-20, 2002.
19. Alptekin G, Dietz S, Jayaraman A, Dubovik M, Amalfitano R. A low cost, high capacity regenerable sorbent for CO2 capture. In: A&WMA's 102nd annual conference & exhibition. Detroit, MI, USA; June 16-19, 2009.
20. Rao A.D., Francuz D.J. An evaluation of advanced combined cycles. Appl Energy 2013, 102:1178-1186.
21. Different Coal Ranks. The National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). [accessed 10.10.13]. http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/gasification/gasifipedia/coal.html.
22. Conservation Reserve Program. Farm service agency, the U.S. Department of Agriculture. [accessed 25.09.13]. http://www.fsa.usda.gov/FSA/webapp?area=home&subject=copr&topic=crp.
23. Downing M, Langseth D, Stoffel R, Kroll T. Large-scale hybrid poplar production economics: 1995 Alexandria, Minnesota. In: 7th National bioenergy conference. Nashville, Tennessee, USA; September 15-20, 1996.
24. Mulkey V.R., Owens V.N., Lee D.K. Management of switchgrass-dominated conservation reserve program lands for biomass production in south dakota. Crop Sci 2006, 46(2):712-720.
25. Carpenter D.L., Bain R.L., Davis R.E., Dutta A., Feik C.J., Gaston K.R., et al. Pilot-scale gasification of corn stover, switchgrass, wheat straw, and wood: 1. Parametric study and comparison with literature. Ind Eng Chem Res 2010, 49(4):1859-1871.
26. Advanced Gasification: Novel CO2 Utilization Systems, Low Rank Coal IGCC Optimization, and Improvements in Gasification Systems Availability and Costs. DoE Funding Opportunity Number: DE-FOA0000496; March 15, 2011.
27. Matuszewski M. Greenhouse Gas Reductions in the Power Industry Using Domestic Coal and Biomass Volume 2: Pulverized Coal Plants. DoE/NETL, Report 2012/1547; February 2012.
28. Matuszewski M. Greenhouse gas reductions in the power industry using domestic coal and biomass - volume 1: IGCC. DOE/NETL-2012/1546; February, 2012.
29. van Holthoon E. Shell gasification processes. In: Gasification technology conference. San Francisco, California, USA; 2007.
30. Crocker C.R., Benson S.A., Holmes M.J., Zhuang Y., Pavlish J.H., Galbreath K.C. Comparison of sorbents and furnace additives for mercury control in low-rank fuel combustion systems. Prep Pap Am Chem Soc Div Fuel Chem 2004, 49(1):289.
31. Black J. Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants volume 1: bituminous coal and natural gas to electricity. DOE/NETL-2010/1397; November 2010.
32. Umeki K., Yamamoto K., Namioka T., Yoshikawa K. High temperature steam-only gasification of woody biomass. Appl Energy 2009, 87(3):791-798.
33. Lemus R., Brummer E.C., Moore K.J., Molstad N.E., Burras C.L., Barker M.F. Biomass yield and quality of 20 switchgrass populations in southern Iowa, USA. Biomass Bioenergy 2002, 23(6):433-442.
34. Smith A., Klosek J. A review of air separation technologies and their integration with energy conversion processes. Fuel Process Technol 2001, 70(2):115-134.
35. 2 capture. Greenhouse Gas Control Technol 2004, 7.
36. Vapor Recompression to Recover Low Pressure Waste Steam.: Everest. [accessed 10.10.13]. http://www.everestblowers.com/technical-articles/Mechanical_Vapor_Recompression.pdf.
37. Kobayashi J., Itaya Y., Tsukada S., Mizuno K., Ueda M., Morikawa H., et al. Drying technology for woody biomass for fine grinding by vibration mills. Asia-Pacific J Chem Eng 2007, 2(2):83-89.
38. Mani S., Tabil L.G., Sokhansanj S. Grinding performance and physical properties of wheat and barley straws, corn stover and switchgrass. Biomass Bioenergy 2004, 27(4):339-352.
39. Bonk DL, Hay A. Stamet Solids Pump Feeds Coal into 210 psig in a DOE Supported Project. DOE/METC/C-96/7208; 1995.
40. Aldred D, Saunders T, Shirey G. Results of DOE funded research to achieve continuous injection of solid fuels into advanced combustion and gasification system pressures. In: 2003 Gasification technology conference; Octorber 12; 2003.
41. Alptekin G, Lind J, Amalfitano R, Copeland R. Sorbents for mercury removal from coal-derived synthesis gas. In: Twentieth annual international pittsburgh coal conference, Pittsburgh, PA.: 2003; 2003.
42. Matta R, Mercer G, Tuthill R. Power systems for the 21st century - "H" Gas turbine combined-cycles. GE Power Systems; 2000.
43. Sharma S.D., Dolan M., Ilyushechkin A., McLennan K., Nguyen T., Chase D. Recent developments in dry hot syngas cleaning processes. Fuel 2010, 89(4):817-826.
44. Martin RA, Gardner B, Guan X, Hendrix H. Power system development facility: high temperature high pressure filtration in gasification operation. In: Proceedings of 5th international symposium on gas cleaning at high temperature: September 17-20; 2002.
45. Armstrong P. Method for predicting performance of an ion transport membrane unit-operation. Air Products and Chemicals Inc, Pennsylvania, USA; 2002.
46. Bishop B, Raskin N. CeraMem filter development program. Advanced coal-fired power systems '96 review meeting. Morgantown, West Virginia, USA; 1996.
47. Copeland RJ, Alptekin G, Cessario M, Gebhard S, Gerhanovich Y. A novel CO2 separation system. In: The eighth international symposium on transport phenomena and dynamics of rotating machinery. Honolulu, HI, USA; 2000.
48. Rath LK. Assessment of hydrogen production with CO2 capture volume 1: baseline state-of-the-art plants. DoE/NETL, report 2010/1434 August 30; 2010.
49. SRI. PEP Yearbook International. Menlo Park, CA, USA: SRI International; 1985.
50. Black JB. Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants volume 3a: low rank coal to electricity: IGCC cases. DOE/NETL-2010/1399; May 2011.
51. DOE announces new hydrogen cost goal, July 14; 2005. [assecced 25.12.12]. http://www1.eere.energy.gov.
52. Lin Z., Chen C.W., Ogden J., Fan Y. The least-cost hydrogen for Southern California. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33(12):3009-3014.