Computed tomography staging of pancreatic cancer: A validation study addressing interobserver agreement

Pancreatology

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 570-575

  Loizou, L ^a,b   Albiin, N ^a,b   Ansorge, C ^a,b   Andersson, M ^c   Segersvard R ^a,b   Leidner, B ^a,b   Sundin, A ^a,b   Lundell, L ^b   Kartalis, N ^a,b  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Blood vessels; Classification; Diagnostic imaging; Pancreatic ductal carcinoma; Surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVANCED CANCER; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER SURVIVAL; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS ADENOCARCINOMA; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PORTAL VEIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; SUPERIOR MESENTERIC VEIN; VALIDATION STUDY;

BLOOD VESSELS; CLASSIFICATION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; PANCREATIC DUCTAL CARCINOMA; SURGERY;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PANCREAS; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84892622992     PISSN: 14243903     EISSN: 14243911     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2013.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Zakharova OP, Karmazanovsky GG, Egorov VI. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: outstanding problems. World J Gastrointest Surg 2012 May 27; 4(5): 104e 13.
2. Bond-Smith G, Banga N, Hammond TM, Imber CJ. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. BMJ 2012 May 16; 344: e2476.
3. Vincent A, Herman J, Schulick R, Hruban RH, Goggins M. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet 2011 Aug 13; 378(9791): 607e20.
4. OMalley ME, Boland GW, Wood BJ, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Warshaw AL, Mueller PR. Adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: determination of surgical unresectability with thin-section pancreatic-phase helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999 Dec; 173(6): 1513e8.
5. Lu DS, Reber HA, Krasny RM, Kadell BM, Sayre J. Local staging of pancreatic cancer: criteria for unresectability of major vessels as revealed by pancreaticphase, thin-section helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997 Jun; 168(6): 1439e43.
6. Phoa SS, Reeders JW, Stoker J, Rauws EA, Gouma DJ, Lamé ris JS. CT criteria for venous invasion in patients with pancreatic head carcinoma. Br J Radiol 2000 Nov; 73(875): 1159e64.
7. Turrini O, Ewald J, Barbier L, Mokart D, Blache JL, Delpero JR. Should the portal vein be routinely resected during pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma? Ann Surg 2013 Apr; 257(4): 726e30.
8. Varadhachary GR, Tamm EP, Abbruzzese JL, Xiong HQ, Crane CH, Wang H, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions, management, and role of preoperative therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2006 Aug; 13(8): 1035e46.
9. Chun YS, Milestone BN, Watson JC, Cohen SJ, Burtness B, Engstrom PF, et al. Defining venous involvement in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2010 Nov; 17(11): 2832e8.
10. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979 Mar; 86(2): 420e8.
11. Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. J R Stat Soc Series D 1983; 32: 307e17.
12. Ronot M, Bahrami S, Calderaro J, Valla DC, Bedossa P, Belghiti J, et al. Hepatocellular adenomas: accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and liver biopsy in subtype classification. Hepatology 2011 Apr; 53(4): 1182e 91.
13. Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Bollen TL, van Leeuwen MS, Lamé ris JS, van der Jagt EJ, et al., Dutch Acute Pancreatitis Study Group. Describing computed tomography findings in acute necrotizing pancreatitis with the Atlanta classification: an interobserver agreement study. Pancreas 2006 Nov; 33(4): 331e 5.
14. Gerke H, Jaffe TA, Mitchell RM, Byrne MF, Stiffler HL, Branch MS, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound and computer tomography are inaccurate methods of classifying cystic pancreatic lesions. Dig Liver Dis 2006 Jan; 38(1): 39e44.
15. Verbeke CS, Menon KV. Redefining resection margin status in pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford) 2009 Jun; 11(4): 282e9.
16. Tamm EP, Bhosale PR, Vikram R, de Almeida Marcal LP, Balachandran A. Imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: state of the art. World J Radiol 2013 Mar; 5(3): 98e105.