Better early osteogenesis of electroconductive hydroxyapatite-calcium titanate composites in a rabbit animal model

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 102, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 842-851

  Mallik, Prafulla Kumar ^a   Basu, Bikramjit ^b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

calcium titanate; electrical conductivity; HA; in vivo biocompatibility

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM TITANATE; CONDUCTIVITY PROPERTIES; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROCONDUCTIVE; EXTERNAL ELECTRIC FIELD; HA; IN-VIVO; ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE; CALCIUM COMPOUNDS; DEFECTS; HYDROXYAPATITE; SINTERING;

ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY;

CALCIUM; CALCIUM TITANATE; HYDROXYAPATITE; TITANIUM; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE DEFECT; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE IMPLANT; BONE REGENERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; FEMALE; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION;

CALCIUM TITANATE; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; HA; IN VIVO BIOCOMPATIBILITY;

ANIMALS; BONE REGENERATION; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CALCIUM; DURAPATITE; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; FEMALE; FEMUR; MALE; MODELS, ANIMAL; OSTEOGENESIS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RABBITS; TITANIUM;

EID: 84892594754     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34752     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Steinberg ME, Bosch A, Schwan JRA, Glazer R,. Electrical potentials in stressed bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1968; 61: 294.
2. Bassett C, Becker RO,. Generation of electric potentials by bone in response to mechanical stress. Science (New York, NY) 1962; 137: 1063.
3. Friedenberg Z, Andrews E, Sinolenski B, Pearl B, Brighton C,. Bone reaction to varying amounts of direct current. Plast Reconstr Surg 1971; 48: 95.
4. Nakamura S, Takeda H, Yamashita K,. Proton transport polarization and depolarization of hydroxyapatite ceramics. J Appl Phys 2001; 89: 5386.
5. Gauthier O, Bouler JM, Aguado E, Legeros R, Pilet P, Daculsi G,. Elaboration conditions influence physicochemical properties and in vivo bioactivity of macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1999; 10: 199-204.
6. Ueshima M, Nakamura S, Yamashita K,. Huge, millicoulomb charge storage in ceramic hydroxyapatite by bimodal electric polarization. Adv Mater 2002; 14: 591-595.
7. Gittings J, Bowen CR, Turner IG, Baxter FR, Chaudhuri JB,. Polarisation behaviour of calcium phosphate based ceramics. Mater Sci Forum 2008; 587: 91-95.
8. Gittings J, Bowen CR, Dent ACE, Turner IG, Baxter FR, Chaudhuri JB,. Electrical characterization of hydroxyapatite-based bioceramics. Acta Biomaterialia 2009; 5: 743-754.
9. Hastings G, Mahmud F,. Electrical effects in bone. J Biomed Eng 1988; 10: 515-521.
10. Singh S, Saha S,. Electrical properties of bone: A review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984; 186: 249.
11. Ravalioli A, Kraiewski A, editors. Bioceramics: Materials-Properties- Applications. London: Chapman & Hall; 1992. p 50-51.
12. Yang W, Liu Z, editors. Biomedical Engineering. Tianjing: TJST; 1993. p 29-43.
13. Dubey AK, Tripathi G, Basu B,. Characterization of hydroxyapatite- perovskite (CaTiO3) composites: Phase evaluation and cellular response. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010; 95: 320-329.
14. 3. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003; 67: 975-980.
15. 3. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003; 67: 975-980.
16. Madhav Reddy K, Kumar N, Basu B,. Innovative multi-stage spark plasma sintering to obtain strong and tough ultrafine-grained ceramics. Scripta Materialia 2010; 62: 435-438.
17. Santos MH, Oliveira M, Souza LPF, Mansur HS, Vasconcelos WL,. Synthesis control and characterization of hydroxyapatite prepared by wet precipitation process. Mater Res 2004; 7: 625-630.
18. 2. Mater Sci Forum 2005; 494: 393-398.
19. Saha S, Williams PA,. Comparison of the electrical and dielectric behavior of wet human cortical and cancellous bone tissue from the distal tibia. J Orthop Res 1995; 13: 524-532.
20. Zhang X,. A study of porous block HA ceramics and its osteogenesis. In:, Ravaglioli A, Krajewski A, editors. Bioceramics and the Human Body. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science; 1991. p 692-703.
21. Yamasaki H, Sakai H,. Osteogenic response to porous hydroxyapatite ceramics under the skin of dogs. Biomaterials 1992; 13: 308-312.
22. Yuan H, Van Den Doel M, Li S, Van Blitterswijk C, De Groot K, De Bruijn J,. A comparison of the osteoinductive potential of two calcium phosphate ceramics implanted intramuscularly in goats. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2002; 13: 1271-1275.
23. Yuan H, Li Y, de Bruijn JD, de Groot K, Zhang X,. Tissue responses of calcium phosphate cement: A study in dogs. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 1283-1290.
24. Itoh S, Nakamura S, Nakamura M, Shinomiya K, Yamashita K,. Enhanced bone ingrowth into hydroxyapatite with interconnected pores by electrical polarization. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 5572-5579.
25. Jianqing F, Huipin Y, Xingdong Z,. Promotion of osteogenesis by a piezoelectric biological ceramic. Biomaterials 1997; 18: 1531-1534.
26. Brunski JB,. Influence of biomechanical factors at the bone-biomaterial interface. In:, Davies JE, editor. The Bone-Biomaterial Interface. Ontario: University of Toronto; 1990. p 391-405.
27. Fialkov JA, Holy CE, Shoichet MS, Davies JE,. In vivo bone engineering in a rabbit femur. J Craniofac Surg 2003; 14: 324-332.
28. Davies JE,. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ 2003; 67: 932-949.
29. Puleo D, Nanci A,. Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 2311-2321.