The good, the bad and the early adopters: Providers' attitudes about a common, commercial EHR

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 36-42

  Makam, Anil N ^a   Lanham, Holly J ^b,c   Batchelor, Kim ^a,c   Moran, Brett ^a   Howell Stampley, Temple ^a   Kirk, Lynne ^a,c   Cherukuri, Manjula ^d   Samal, Lipika ^e   Santini, Noel ^f   Leykum, Luci K ^b   Halm, Ethan A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^c SOUTH TEXAS VETERANS HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^e BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f PARKLAND HEALTH AND HOSPITAL SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

attitude of health personnel; attitude to computers; early adopter; electronic health record; physicians; primary care; primary health care

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRESCRIPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; EARLY ADOPTER; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; PHYSICIANS; PRIMARY CARE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84892584473     PISSN: 13561294     EISSN: 13652753     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jep.12076     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Blumenthal, D., (2010) Launching HITECH. New England Journal of Medicine, 362 (5), 382-385.
2. Chaudhry, B., Wang, J., Wu, S., Maglione, M., Mojica, W., Roth, E., Morton, S. C., &, Shekelle, P. G., (2006) Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 144 (10), 742-752.
3. Goldzweig, C. L., Towfigh, A., Maglione, M., &, Shekelle, P. G., (2009) Costs and benefits of health information technology: new trends from the literature. Health Affairs (Millwood), 28 (2), w282-w293.
4. Black, A. D., Car, J., Pagliari, C., Anandan, C., Cresswell, K., Bokun, T., McKinstry, B., Procter, R., Majeed, A., &, Sheikh, A., (2011) The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLoS Medicine, 8 (1), e1000387.
5. Linder, J. A., Ma, J., Bates, D. W., Middleton, B., &, Stafford, R. S., (2007) Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. Archives of Internal Medicine, 167 (13), 1400-1405.
6. Poon, E. G., Wright, A., Simon, S. R., Jenter, C. A., Kaushal, R., Volk, L. A., Cleary, P. D., Singer, J. A., Tumolo, A. Z., &, Bates, D. W., (2010) Relationship between use of electronic health record features and health care quality: results of a statewide survey. Medical Care, 48 (3), 203-209.
7. Lau, F., Price, M., Boyd, J., Partridge, C., Bell, H., &, Raworth, R., (2012) Impact of electronic medical record on physician practice in office settings: a systematic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 12, 10.
8. Van Der Meijden, M. J., Tange, H. J., Troost, J., &, Hasman, A., (2003) Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 10 (3), 235-243.
9. Miller, R. H., &, Sim, I., (2004) Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. Health Affairs (Millwood), 23 (2), 116-126.
10. McGinn, C. A., Grenier, S., Duplantie, J., Shaw, N., Sicotte, C., Mathieu, L., Leduc, Y., Legare, F., &, Gagnon, M. P., (2011) Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review. BMC Medicine, 9, 46.
11. Archer, N., &, Cocosila, M., (2011) A comparison of physician pre-adoption and adoption views on electronic health records in Canadian medical practices. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13 (3), e57.
12. El-Kareh, R., Gandhi, T. K., Poon, E. G., Newmark, L. P., Ungar, J., Lipsitz, S., &, Sequist, T. D., (2009) Trends in primary care clinician perceptions of a new electronic health record. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 24 (4), 464-468.
13. Brookstone, A. J., Underwood, W. S., &, Barr, M. S., (2011) Market share and top 10 rated ambulatory EHR products by practice size. AmericanEHR Partners, October.
14. Davis, F. D., (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Mis Quarterly, 13 (3), 319-340.
15. DesRoches, C. M., Campbell, E. G., Rao, S. R., et al. (2008) Electronic health records in ambulatory care-a national survey of physicians. New England Journal of Medicine, 359 (1), 50-60.
16. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., &, Davis, F. D., (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Mis Quarterly, 27 (3), 425-478.
17. Agarwal, R., &, Prasad, J., (1998) A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9 (2), 204-215.
18. Shachak, A., &, Reis, S., (2009) The impact of electronic medical records on patient-doctor communication during consultation: a narrative literature review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 15 (4), 641-649.
19. Kim, Y., Chen, A. H., Keith, E., Yee, H. F., Jr, &, Kushel, M. B., (2009) Not perfect, but better: primary care providers' experiences with electronic referrals in a safety net health system. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 24 (5), 614-619.
20. Rogers, E. M., (2003) Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn. New York: Free Press.
21. Berwick, D. M., (2009) What 'patient-centered' should mean: confessions of an extremist. Health Affairs (Millwood), 28 (4), w555-w565.