Improving the replicability and reproducibility of research published in the Journal of Research in Personality

Journal of Research in Personality

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 453-454

  Lucas, Richard E ^a   Brent Donnellan, M ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892552301     PISSN: 00926566     EISSN: 10957251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.002     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. Bakker M., van Dijk A., Wicherts J.M. The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2012, 7(6):543-554.
2. Cohen J. The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: a review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1962, 65(3):145-153.
3. Francis G. Too good to be true: Publication bias in two prominent studies from experimental psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2012, 19(2):151-156.
4. Ioannidis J.P. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine 2005, 2(8):e124.
5. Pashler H., Wagenmakers E. Editors' introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science a crisis of confidence?. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2012, 7(6):528-530.
6. Schimmack U. The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles. Psychological Methods 2012, 17:551-566. 10.1037/a0029487.