"Use it or lose it" as an alternative approach to protect genetic privacy in personalized medicine

Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 198-201

  Wagner, Jennifer K ^a   Mozersky, Jessica T ^a   Pyeritz, Reed E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

ELSI; Genetic information; Precision medicine; Privacy; Whole genome sequencing

Indexed keywords

BRCA1 PROTEIN; BRCA2 PROTEIN;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ASYMPTOMATIC DISEASE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RISK; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DUTY TO RECONTACT; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EXOME; FAMILY HISTORY; GENE MUTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC PRIVACY; GENOME; GENOTYPE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEREDITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEGAL LIABILITY; MALPRACTICE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICALIZATION; OVARY CANCER; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PATIENT CARE; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK MANAGEMENT; THERAPEUTIC MISCONCEPTION; WHOLE GENOME SEQUENCING;

ELSI; GENETIC INFORMATION; PRECISION MEDICINE; PRIVACY; WHOLE GENOME SEQUENCING;

CONFIDENTIALITY; DISCLOSURE; GENETIC PRIVACY; GENOMICS; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALIZED MEDICINE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84892493946     PISSN: 10781439     EISSN: 18732496     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.09.016     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. President's Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. Privacy and Progress in Whole Genome Sequencing. October 2012. 〈〉 [accessed 9.10.13]. http://bioethics.gov/sites/default/files/PrivacyProgress508_1.pdf.
2. Belmont J., McGuire A.L. The futility of genomic counseling: essential role of electronic health records. Genom Med 2009, 1:48. 10.1186/gm48.
3. Brenner S. Be prepared for the big genome leak. Nature 2013, 498:139.
4. McGuire A.L., Fisher R., Cusenza P., Hudson K., Rothstein M.A., McGraw D., et al. Confidentiality, privacy, and security of genetic and genomic test information in electronic health records: points to consider. Genet Med 2008, 10:495-499. (10.1097GIM.0b013e31817a8aaa).
5. Lunshof J.E., Chadwick R., Vorhaus D.B., Church G.M. From genetic privacy to open consent. Nat Rev Genet 2008, 5:406-411.
6. Kaye J. The tension between data sharing and the protection of privacy in genomics research. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2012, 13:415-431. 10.1146/annurev-genom-082410-101454.
7. Kuehn B.M. Groups experiment with digital tools for patient consent. J Am Med Assoc 2013, 310:678-680. 10.1001/jama.2013.194643.
8. Ginsburg G.S. Realizing the opportunities of genomics in health care. J Am Med Assoc 2013, 309:1463-1464. (doi:10.1001/jama.2013.1465), 〈http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23571581〉.
9. Manolio T.A., Chisholm R.L., Ozenberger B., et al. Implementing genomic medicine in the clinic: the future is here. Genet Med 2013, 15:258-267. 10.1038/gim.2012.157.
10. Chute C.G., Kohane I.S. Genomic medicine, health information technology, and patient care. J Am Med Assoc 2013, 309:1467-1468. 10.1001/jama.2013.1414.
11. Yu J.-H., Jamal S.M., Tabor H.K., Bamshad M.J. Self-guided management of exome and whole-genome sequencing results: changing the results return model. Genet Med 2013, 15:684-690. 10.1038/gim.2013.35.
12. Pyeritz R.E. The coming explosion in genetic testing-is there a duty to recontact?. N Engl J Med 2011, 365:1367-1369. 10.1056/NEJMp1107564.
13. Kohane I.S., Masys D.R., Altman R.B. The incidentalome: a threat to genomic medicine. J Am Med Assoc 2006, 296:212-215. 10.1001/jama.296.2.212.
14. Green RC, Berg JS, Grody WW, Kalia SS, Korf BR, Martin CL, et al. ACMG Recommendations for Reporting of Incidental Findings in Clinical Exome and Genome Sequencing. 〈〉 [accessed 23.05.13]. http://www.acmg.net/docs/ACMG_Releases_Highly-Anticipated_Recommendations_on_Incidental_Findings_in_Clinical_Exome_and_Genome_Sequencing.pdf.
15. van El C.G., Cornel M.C., Borry P., Hastings R.J., Fellmann F., Hodgson S.V., et al. Whole-genome sequencing in health care: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics. Eur J Hum Genet 2013, 21:580-584. 10.1038/ejhg.2013.46.
16. Terry S, Cook-Deegan R. Your Genome Belongs to You. Health Affairs Blog. June 8, 2012. 〈〉 [accessed 23.05.13]. http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2012/06/08/your-genome-belongs-to-you/.
17. Wetterstrand KA. DNA Sequencing Costs: Data from the NHGRI Genome Sequencing Program (GSP) 〈〉 [accessed 23.05.13]. http://www.genome.gov/sequencingcosts.
18. Biesecker L.G., Burker W., Kohane I., Plon S.E., Zimmern R. Next-generation sequencing in the clinic: are we ready?. Nat Rev Genet 2012, 13:818-824. 10.1038/nrg3357.
19. Venter J.C. Multiple personal genomes await. Nature 2010, 464:676-677. 10.1038/464676a.
20. Ball M.B., Thakuria J.V., Zaranek A.W., et al. A public resource facilitating clinical use of genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2012, 109:11920-11927. 10.1073/pnas.1201904109.
21. Hayden E.C. The genome hacker. Nature 2013, 497:173-174.
22. Modifications to the HIPAA Privacy, Security, Enforcement, and Breach Notification rules under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act; other modifications to the HIPAA rules; Final rule. Fed Regist 2013, 78:5566-5702. DHHS, 〈http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-01-25/pdf/2013-01073.pdf〉.
23. Solove D. The HIPAA-HITECH Regulation, the Cloud, and Beyond. January 22, 2013. 〈〉 [accessed 26.08.13]. http://www.safegov.org/2013/1/22/the-hipaa-hitech-regulation,-the-cloud,-and-beyond.
24. Pate S. HIPAA Compliance on the Cloud. August 20, 2013. Computerworld. 〈〉 [accessed 26.08.13]. http://blogs.computerworld.com/cloud-security/22647/can-you-be-hipaa-compliant-cloud.
25. McGuire A.L., Burke W. An unwelcome side effect of direct-to-consumer-personal genome testing: raiding the medical commons 2008, 300:2669-2671. 10.1001/jama.2008.803.
26. Greenbaum D., Sboner A., Mu X.J., Gerstein M. Genomics and privacy: implications of the new reality of closed data for the field. PLoS Comput Biol 2011, 7:e1002278. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002278.
27. Wolf A.M., Annas G.J., Elias S. Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics. Science 2013, 340:1049-1050.
28. Zimmer C. DNA Double Take. NY Times. September 17, 2013. 〈〉 [accessed 18.09.13]. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/17/science/dna-double-take.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0.
29. Nissenbaum H.F. Privacy in context: technology, policy, and the integrity of social life 2010, Stanford Law Books, Stanford, CA.
30. McGuire A.L., McCullough L.B., Evans J.P. The indispensable role of professional judgment in genomic medicine. J Am Med Assoc 2013, 309:1465-1466. 10.1001/jama.2013.1438.
31. Angrist M. You never call, you never write: why return of "omic" results to research participants is both a good idea and a moral imperative. Per Med 2011, 8:651-657. 10.2217/pme.11.62.
32. Weigand TA Lost chances, felt necessities, and the tale of two cities. Suffolk Univ Law Rev 2010, 43:327-392. (373).