Factors associated with risk for colorectal cancer recurrence after endoscopic resection of T1 tumors

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

  Yoshii, Shinji ^a,b   Nojima, Masanori ^c,d   Nosho, Katsuhiko ^c   Omori, Saori ^e   Kusumi, Takaya ^a   Okuda, Hiroyuki ^a,c   Tsukagoshi, Hiroyuki ^a   Fujita, Masahiro ^f   Yamamoto, Hiroyuki ^c   Hosokawa, Masao ^a  

^a KEIYUKAI SAPPORO HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b Sapporo Medical Center   (Japan)

^c SAPPORO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^e HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^f NAYORO CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Colon Cancer; Neoplasm; Prognostic Factor; Treatment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RECURRENCE; COLORECTAL CANCER; COLORECTAL SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION; ENDOSCOPIC POLYPECTOMY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; JAPAN; LYMPH VESSEL METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RECURRENCE RISK; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT INDICATION; TUMOR INVASION;

CI; COLON CANCER; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CRC; CRR; CUMULATIVE RISK OF RECURRENCE; ENDOSCOPIC RESECTION; ER; ER + SURG; IP; JAPANESE SOCIETY FOR CANCER OF THE COLON AND RECTUM; JSCCR; LNM; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; NEOPLASM; PEDUNCULATED TYPE; PROGNOSTIC FACTOR; PROPENSITY SCORE; PROS; SUBSEQUENT SURGERY AFTER ENDOSCOPIC RESECTION; TREATMENT;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; ENDOSCOPY, GASTROINTESTINAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84892488762     PISSN: 15423565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Muto T., Oya M. Recent advances in diagnosis and treatment of colorectal T1 carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 2003, 46:S89-S93.
2. Kyzer S., Begin L.R., Gordon P.H., et al. The care of patients with colorectal polyps that contain invasive adenocarcinoma: endoscopic polypectomy or colectomy?. Cancer 1992, 70:2044-2050.
3. Nascimbeni R., Burgart L.J., Nivatvongs S., et al. Risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 2002, 45:200-206.
4. Kitajima K., Fujimori T., Fujii S., et al. Correlations between lymph node metastasis and depth of submucosal invasion in submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma: a Japanese collaborative study. JGastroenterol 2004, 39:534-543.
5. Hassan C., Zullo A., Risio M., et al. Histologic risk factors and clinical outcome in colorectal malignant polyp: a pooled-data analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2005, 48:1588-1596.
6. Yasuda K., Inomata M., Shiromizu A., et al. Risk factors for occult lymph node metastasis of colorectal cancer invading the submucosa and indications for endoscopic mucosal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2007, 50:1370-1376.
7. Nakadoi K., Tanaka S., Kanao H., et al. Management of T1 colorectal carcinoma with special reference to criteria for curative endoscopic resection. JGastroenterol Hepatol 2012, 27:1057-1062.
8. Ueno H., Mochizuki H., Hashiguchi Y., et al. Risk factors for an adverse outcome in early invasive colorectal carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2004, 127:385-394.
9. Kikuchi R., Takano M., Takagi K., et al. Management of early invasive colorectal cancer: risk of recurrence and clinical guidelines. Dis Colon Rectum 1995, 38:1286-1295.
10. Kudo S. Endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed early colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 1993, 25:455-461.
11. Volk E.E., Goldblum J.R., Petras R.E., et al. Management and outcome of patients with invasive carcinoma arising in colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 1995, 109:1801-1807.
12. Cooper H.S., Deppisch L.M., Gourley W.K., et al. Endoscopically removed malignant colorectal polyps: clinical pathological correlations. Gastroenterology 1995, 108:1657-1665.
13. Seitz U., Bohnacker S., Seewald S., et al. Is endoscopic polypectomy and adequate therapy for malignant colorectal polyps? presentation of 114 patients and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 2004, 47:1789-1797.
14. Netzer P., Binck J., Hammer B., et al. Significance of histological criteria for the management of patients with malignant colorectal polyps. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997, 323:915-916.
15. Morson B.C., Whiteway J.E., Jones E.A., et al. Histopathology and prognosis of malignant colorectal polyps treated by endoscopic polypectomy. Gut 1984, 25:437-444.
16. Oka S., Tanaka S., Kanao H., et al. Mid-term prognosis after endoscopic resection for submucosal colorectal carcinoma: summary of a multicenter questionnaire survey conducted by the colorectal endoscopic resection standardization implementation working group in Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Dig Endosc 2011, 23:190-194.
17. Meining A., von Delius S., Eames T.M. Risk factors for unfavorable outcomes after endoscopic removal of submucosal invasive colorectal tumors. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011, 9:590-594.
18. Edge S.B., Byrd D.R., Carducci M.A., et al. AJCC Cancer staging manual 2009, Springer, New York, NY. 7th ed.
19. Charlson M.E., Pompel P., Ales K.L., et al. Anew method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. JChronic Dis 1987, 40:373-383.
20. Watanabe T., Itabashi M., Shimada Y., et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2010 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2012, 17:1-29.
21. Bosman F.T. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. International Agency for Research on Cancer 2010, 134-146. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer.
22. Participants in the Paris Workshop. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon-2002. Gastrointestinal Endosc 2003, 58:S3-S43.
23. Cepeda M.S., Boston R., Farrar J.T., et al. Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders. Am J Epidemiol 2003, 158:280-287.
24. General rules for clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon, rectum and anus 1998, 34-35. Japanese Research Society for Cancer of Colon and Rectum, Kanehara Shuppan, Tokyo. 6th ed.
25. Ikematsu H., Yoda Y., Matsuda T., et al. Long-term outcomes after resection for submucosal invasive colorectal cancers. Gastroenterology 2013, 144:551-559.
26. Boenicke L., Fein M., Sailer M., et al. The concurrence of histologically positive resection margins and sessile morphology is an important risk factor for lymph node metastasis after complete endoscopic removal of malignant colorectal polyps. Int J Colorectal Dis 2010, 25:433-438.
27. Haggitt R.C., Glotzbach R.E., Soffer E.E., et al. Prognostic factors in colorectal carcinomas arising in adenomas: implications for lesions removed by endoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology 1985, 89:328-336.
28. Matsuda T., Fukuzawa M., Uraoka T., et al. Risk of lymph node metastasis in patients with pedunculated type early invasive colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter study. Cancer Sci 2011, 102:1693-1697.
29. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology colon cancer, version 3. 2013. Available at: Accessed June 5,2013. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/colon.pdf.
30. Hotta K., Fujii T., Saito Y., et al. Local recurrence after endoscopic resection of colorectal tumors. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009, 24:225-230.
31. Matsuda T., Fujii T., Saito Y., et al. Efficacy of the invasive/non-invasive pattern by magnifying chromoendoscopy to estimate the depth of invasion of early colorectal neoplasms. Am J Gastroenterol 2008, 103:2700-2706.
32. Kanao H., Tanaka S., Oka S., et al. Narrow-band imaging magnification predicts the histology and invasion depth of colorectal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 2009, 69:631-636.
33. Hurlstone D.P., Brown S., Cross S.S., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound miniprobe staging of colorectal cancer: can management be modified?. Endoscopy 2005, 37:710-714.
34. Saito Y., Fukuzawa M., Matsuda T., et al. Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection. Surg Endosc 2010, 24:343-352.
35. Hotta K., Saito Y., Fujishiro M., et al. Impact of endoscopic submucosal dissection for the therapeutic strategy of largecolorectal tumors. JGastroenterol Hepatol 2011, 27:510-515.