Spatial variation of soil lead in an urban community garden: Implications for risk-based sampling

Risk Analysis

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 17-27

  Bugdalski, Lauren ^a   Lemke, Lawrence D ^a   Mcelmurry, Shawn P ^b  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Wayne State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Sampling design; Soil lead; Urban gardening

Indexed keywords

LEAD CONCENTRATION; MEAN CONCENTRATIONS; SAMPLING DESIGN; SAMPLING STRATEGIES; SPATIAL VARIABILITY; SPATIAL VARIATIONS; U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; URBAN GARDENING;

HOUSING; LEAD; SOILS;

SOIL POLLUTION;

CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DATA SET; GARDEN; LEAD; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAMPLING; SOIL POLLUTION; SPATIAL VARIATION; URBAN AREA;

DETROIT; MICHIGAN; UNITED STATES;

LEAD;

ANALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; CITY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GARDENING; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; LAND USE; LEAD POISONING; MICHIGAN; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PROCEDURES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL; SOIL POLLUTANT; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES; URBAN HEALTH;

CITIES; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GARDENING; GARDENS; HUMANS; LEAD; LEAD POISONING; MICHIGAN; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL; SOIL POLLUTANTS; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; URBAN HEALTH;

EID: 84892479318     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/risa.12053     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. U.S. EPA. Sources of Lead in Soil: A Literature Review. EPA 747-R-98-001a. Washington, DC: Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1998.
2. Mielke HW, Reagan P. Soil is an important pathway of human lead exposure. Environmental Health Perspectives, 1998; 106:217-229.
3. Filippelli GM, Laidlaw MAS. The elephant in the playground: Confronting lead-contaminated soils as an important source of lead burdens to urban populations. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 2010; 53(1):31-45.
4. Paustenbach DJ, Finley BL, Long TF. The critical role of house dust in understanding the hazards posed by contaminated soils. International Journal of Toxicology, 1997; 16:339-362.
5. U.S. EPA. Exposure Factors Handbook: Soil Ingestion and Pica. Washington, DC: Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1997.
6. Stanek EJ, Calabrese EJ, Xu B. Meta-analysis of mass-balance studies of soil ingestion in children. Risk Analysis, 2012; 32(3):433-447.
7. U.S. EPA. Exposure Factors Handbook: Fruit and Vegetable Intake. Washington, DC: Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1997.
8. Gallagher J. Reimagining Detroit: Opportunities for Redefining an American City. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2010.
9. Turner AH. Urban Agriculture and Soil Contamination: An Introduction to Urban Gardening. Louisville, KY: University of Louisville, 2009.
10. Gustafsson J, Tiberg C, Edkymish A, Kleja DB. Modelling lead(ii) sorption to ferrihydrite and soil organic matter. Environmental Chemistry, 2011; 8(5):485-492.
11. Coppola E, Capra G, Odierna P, Vacca S, Buondonno A. Lead distribution as related to pedological features of soils in the Volturno River low basin (Campania, Italy). Geoderma, 2012; 159(3-4):342-349.
12. Boudreault J, Dube J, Chouteau M, Winiarski T, Hardy E. Geophysical characterization of contaminated urban fills. Engineering Geology, 2010; 116(3-4):196-206.
13. Clark HF, Hausladen DM, Brabander DJ. Urban gardens: Lead exposure, recontamination mechanisms, and implications for remediation design. Environmental Research, 2008; 107(3):312-319.
14. de Gruijter J, Brus D, Bierkens M, Knotters M. Sampling for Natural Resource Monitoring. The Netherlands: Springer, 2006.
15. U.S. EPA. Region VIII Superfund Program Residential Soil Lead Sampling Guidance Document. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Denver, CO; 2000.
16. U.S. EPA. Superfund Lead-Contaminated Residential Sites Handbook. OSWER 9285. Washington, DC: 1 Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2003.
17. White PD, Van Leeuwen P, Davis BD, Maddaloni M, Hogan KA, Marcus AH, Elias, RW. The conceptual structure of the integrated exposure uptake biokinetic model for lead in children. Environmental Health Perspectives, 1998; 106:1513-1530.
18. U.S. EPA. Guidance Manual for the Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic Model for Lead in Children. EPA/540/R-93/081, PB93-963510. Washington, DC: Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1994.
19. Ruby MV, Schoof R, Brattin W, Goldade M, Post G, Harnois M, Mosby DE, Casteel SW, Berti W, Carpenter M, Edwards D, Cragin D, Chappell W. Advances in evaluating the oral bioavailability of inorganics in soil for use in human health risk assessment. Environmental Science & Technology, 1999; 33(21):3697-3705.
20. U.S. EPA. Estimation of Relative Bioavailability of Lead in Soil and Soil-Like Materials Using in vivo and in vitro Methods. OSWER 9285.7-77.Washington, DC: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, United State Environmental Protection Agency, 2007.
21. U.S. EPA. Lead; Identification of Dangerous Leavels of Lead; Final Rule. Federal Register. 40 CFR Part 745. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2001.
22. CDC. CDC Response to Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Recommendations in "Low Level Lead Exposure Harms Children: A Renewed Call of Primary Prevention". Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2012. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/acclpp/CDC_Response_Lead_Exposure_Recs.pdf.
23. Drexler JW, Brattin WJ. An in vitro procedure for estimation of lead relative bioavailability: With validation. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2007; 13(2):383-401.
24. Que Hee SS, Peace B, Clark CS, Boyle JR, Bornschein RL, Hammond PB. Evolution of efficient methods to sample lead sources, such as house dust and hand dust, in the homes of children. Environmental Research, 1985; 38(1):77-95.
25. TRW. Short Sheet: TRW Recommendations for Sampling and Analysis of Soil at Lead (PB) Sites. EPA #540-F-00-010. Washington, DC: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, 2000.
26. U.S. EPA. Technical Support Document: Parameters and Equations Used in the Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic Model for Lead in Children (v. 0.99d). EPA 540/R-94/040. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1994.
27. Casteel SW, Cowart RP, Weis CP, Henningsen GM, Hoffman E, Brattin WJ, Guzman RE, Starost MF, Payne JT, Stockham SL, Becker SV, Drexler JW, Turk JR. Bioavailability of lead to juvenile swine dosed with soil from the Smuggler Mountain NPL site of Aspen, Colorado. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology, 1997; 36(2):177-187.
28. Maddaloni M, Lolacono N, Manton W, Blum C, Drexler J, Graziano J. Bioavailability of soilborne lead in adults, by stable isotope dilution. Environmental Health Perspectives, 1998; 106:1589-1594.
29. Ruby MV, Davis A, Schoof R, Eberle S, Sellstone CM. Estimation of lead and arsenic bioavailability using a physiologically based extraction test. Environmental Science & Technology, 1996; 30(2):422-430.
30. U.S. EPA. Method 3051a-Microwave Assisted Acid Digestion of Sediments, Sludges, Soils, and Oils. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2007.
31. Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Eaton AD (eds). Method 3111-Metals by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, 20th ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation, 1998.
32. NIST. Standard Reference Material 2585: Trace Elements in Soil Contianing Lead from Paint. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards & Technology, 2008.
33. Zia MH, Scheckel KG, Chaney RL. Fractional bio-accessibility: A new tool with revised recommendations for Pb risk assessment for urban garden soils and superfund sites. In 2010 International Annual Meetings, Green Revolution 2.0: Food+Energy and Environmental Security. Long Beach, CA: ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, 2010.
34. McBridge M, Mathur R, Baker L. Chemical extractability of lead in field-contaminated soils: Implications for estimating total lead. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2011; 428:1581-1593.
35. Dean RB, Dixon WJ. Simplified statistics for small numbers of observations. Analytical Chemistry, 1951; 23(4):636-638.
36. Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM. An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
37. Thayer WC, Griffith DA, Goodrum PE, Diamond GL, Hassett JM. Application of geostatistics to risk assessment. Risk Analysis, 2003; 23(5):945-960.
38. Remy N, Boucher A, Wu J. Applied Geostatistics with SGeMS: A User's Guide. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
39. Deutsch CV, Journel AG. GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User Guide. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
40. Goovaerts P. Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
41. Abouelnasr DM. The relationship between soil particle size and lead concentration. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of Soils, Sediments, Water and Energy, 2009; 14(8):81-86.
42. Gore S, Patil G. Identifying extremely large values using composite sample data. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 1994; 1(3):227-245.
43. Gore S, Patil G, Taille C. Identification of the largest individual sample value using composite sample data and certain modifications of the sweep-out method. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 1996; 3(3):219-234.
44. Hsiao CK, Juang K-W, Lee D-Y. Estimating the second-stage sample size and the most probable number of hot spots from a first-stage sample of heavy-metal contaminated soil. Geoderma, 2000; 95:73-88.
45. Cox LA. Adaptive spatial sampling of contaminated soil. Risk Analysis, 1999; 19(6):1059-1069.
46. Clark HF, Brabander DJ, Erdil RM. Sources, sinks, and exposure pathways of lead in urban garden soil. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2006; 35(6):2066-2074.