Interpretation of concordance measures for clustered data

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 714-716

  Van Klaveren, David ^a   Steyerberg, Ewout W ^a   Vergouwe, Yvonne ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE MIX; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONCORDANCE PROBABILITY; DATA PROCESSING; DECISION MAKING; HEAD AND NECK CANCER; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CODING; PROBABILITY; PROGNOSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SAMPLING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL TIME; VALIDATION PROCESS;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; PROGNOSIS;

EID: 84892454017     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.5928     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Mauguen A, Collette S, Pignon J-P, Rondeau V. Concordance measures in shared frailty models: application to clustered data in cancer prognosis. Statistics in Medicine 2013. DOI: 10.1002/sim.5852.
2. Uno H, Cai T, Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB, Wei LJ. On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data. Statistics in Medicine 2011; 30: 1105-1117.
3. Gönen M, Heller G. Concordance probability and discriminatory power in proportional hazards regression. Biometrika 2005; 92: 965-970.
4. Van Oirbeek R, Lesaffre E. An application of Harrell's C-index to PH frailty models. Statistics in Medicine 2010; 29: 3160-3171.
5. Harrell FE, Jr., Califf RM, Pryor DB, Lee KL, Rosati RA. Evaluating the yield of medical tests. JAMA 1982; 247: 2543-2546.
6. Vergouwe Y, Moons KG, Steyerberg EW. External validity of risk models: use of benchmark values to disentangle a case-mix effect from incorrect coefficients. American Journal of Epidemiology 2010; 172: 971-980.
7. Altman DG, Royston P. What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Statistics in Medicine 2000; 19: 453-473.